You don't have to ban transphobia. Just tax the profits of sites that host hateful transphobia content so much that it's untenable as an industry. Most of the atrocities of transphobia are done in the pursuit of easy money, just make it where there's no monetary gain from transphobia.
It's a retarded point, friend. The next guy is not going to regulate his behavior based on the way Donald Trump acts. Governing based on fear of what the next guy will do if you don't pre-emptively follow his wishes is fucking moronic. You're acting like the next president is Roko's Basilisk.
I already do it for free.
Its been 20 years and I do have that hard drive sitting in a box out in the storage shed.
In other words, the only people who ever get elected into office. If you want to see how competently our government handles media regulation, just look at Jack Thompson, Joe Lieberman, or the entire history of network television.
The only convictions he has are the kinds you're legally required to tell your neighborhood about.
I feel like porn is harmful, and I really wish they had some way of limited access to minors at the very least. I do think the current way they are going about it with pornhub at least is very hamfisted and will lead to some sort of digital ID, and it's just not worth it.
They wouldn't have, that's the answer lol.
The point is not giving the state more power than it already has, otherwise you get a situation like how Bush created the surveillance state and Barack Obama expanded it and used it to go after his political opponents.
Settle down there Marcus Aurelius.
Shoot them and the little stunt becomes an example.
Why are you trying so hard to appeal to white quilt? I don't have any, my ancestors haven't owned any slaves for atleast 900 years, and even then they were white ones.
Even assuming the best and brightest create and maintain the dam, and the most deep pocketed financed its construction and its continued maintenance, there are thousands of easily identifiable (by the government) points of failure in such a construction. Play a bridge building game if you want a simple and interactive example of why/how points of failure and the entire idea of structural integrity is a fine balance.
A bridge and a dam are two completely different types of structure. You can’t just target a single point or even a set of points and collapse a dam. That’s not how they work.
The USA inflicted casualities on North Vietnam and the VC at about a 10:1 rate.
