US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
there's two tests that always must be done with any policy or decision:

1. Will this survive first contact with Niggers, Jeets, Chinks, Rednecks and Jews?
2. Would the left be able to abuse the shit out of this by twisting it around to something they want to force everyone to do?
If this is the standard that you use 100% of the time then nothing gets done because the left can and will exploit anything and everything. Every policy that's ever existed can be twisted by the left, they've been doing it for over a hundred years.

The problem with the whole excuse of "regulating or banning anything leads to a slippery slope of problems" for not doing anything is that we are already on a very slippery slope of problems from certain things not being regulated or banned. Things are actively going wrong and it needs to be fixed and Libertarians complaining about "muh small government" don't offer any solutions, they just want to feed the problems the US has.

You can easily argue that banning children from undergoing gender surgery or banning men from playing in women's sports is an overreach of the government and enforcing laws such as that is "big government" instead of "muh small government" but most people are perfectly fine with banning such things anyway because it's generally understood that it's harmful to the population.

"But what about muh gun rights?" most murders from gun violence or any mass shooting are committed by people using illegally attained firearms anyway, much less of these crimes are committed by legal gun owners. Gun control doesn't make sense and there isn't any data that supports gun control even being effective so that won't work here, it's not even a comparable issue.

When it comes to porn I think at the very least it should be illegal to make money from any pornographic content or actions. "But muh small government!!!" Well prostitution is already illegal and the only difference between prostitution and porn is that porn is much more harmful so go fuck yourself. The same thing applies for harmful food ingredients that corporations pump into US food to save money. If it's harmful to people then it should be banned and it doesn't take a mega government to enforce such laws.

Children are getting exposed to porn online at a far more rapid rate than before the internet exists, in fact it's actually impossible to avoid running into some porn if you are on the internet and every child is on the internet. The mainstream pretty much glorifies women making careers off of OnlyFans as feminist heroes and more and more young girls are ruining their lives trying to be the next big e-porn star and if you think society isn't conditioning sexual activity into children at younger ages than natural you would be wrong. Children are taught to "explore their sexual identities" in kindergarten in some states. Something needs to be done about it and whining about "muh small government" isn't going to fix these issues.

People are getting sick from eating the toxins pumped into their foods by companies they thought they could trust to, ya know, not poison them. Something needs to be done about it and I don't give a shit about Libertarians whining about it. Libertarians had their chance and they had me at one point in history but they decided to go down a path of defending faggotry, degeneracy and harming society instead of coming up with real solutions to real issues so you lost me.

Fear mongering about what could happen if such poisons were banned from society doesn't work when a good half of society is already scared about what's coming in the future with these poisons being left to spread with no control.
 
Because India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons and China has a direct interest in the situation (also nuclear armed) as they, too, have land claims in Kashmir. It's a far more serious situation than Ukraine-Russia or Israel-Palestine.
I'll believe the pajeets and sand pajeets have working nukes when i see it. as far as a world war goes, i doubt this would set it off. none of these countries are firmly allied with the west and the sliver of dirt they're fighting over holds no real value to anyone outside the conflict.

WW3 would be an immediate global nuking and certainly end with billions of people dead. for as retarded as the western leaders are they're smart enough to not start ww3 in Ukraine despite Zelensky constantly begging us to, i doubt they're going to commit suicide over something like this.
 
Trump summons his inner:
Honest Abe to suspend habeas corpus
Eisenhower to send the military to racist universities.
Bush to invade Panama and maybe Greenland

Andrew Jackson to cuck the courts
Also channeling his inner Silent Cal by gutting US taxpayer funded waste and fraud.
 
Things are actively going wrong and it needs to be fixed and Libertarians complaining about "muh small government" don't offer any solutions, they just want to feed the problems the US has.
lolbertarians want to live in an country that the founders would've never wanted to make, based on a definition of "freedom" that never existed in human history and backed by a weak, limp wristed power structure that is incapable of doing anything meaningful and would be toppled in an afternoon.
GCpUWRZWYAEWZlp.webp
 
If you're going to have firearms in a house with children, you need to teach them about respecting firearms. No ifs, ands, or buts.
It's a shame that those children had to go through all that, but I pin the blame squarely on the parents.
You can teach them all you want, but guns are cool and kids are retards. You really just do need to keep your shit locked up.
 
2 kids got a hold of and were playing with a handgun.
They were disarmed safely and successfully.
Blacks on social media outraged they weren't actually shot.
--------
New Mexico police fire non-lethal rounds and successfully disarm two young boys who were holding a loaded handgun. The boys, 7 and 9, were seen pointing the gun toward police. The moment was caught on a drone which helped police carry out the operation. The boys were eventually disarmed and were not injured.
These boys are niggers.
 
2 kids got a hold of and were playing with a handgun.
They were disarmed safely and successfully.
Blacks on social media outraged they weren't actually shot.
--------
New Mexico police fire non-lethal rounds and successfully disarm two young boys who were holding a loaded handgun. The boys, 7 and 9, were seen pointing the gun toward police. The moment was caught on a drone which helped police carry out the operation. The boys were eventually disarmed and were not injured.
BB-8 there is lucky he didn't get shot. It looked like he aimed it at the cops right after the first time they shot at him.
 
Because India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons and China has a direct interest in the situation (also nuclear armed) as they, too, have land claims in Kashmir. It's a far more serious situation than Ukraine-Russia or Israel-Palestine.
Pakistan's only play in an actual war with India is to sell their asses to China. Not great.

What is Tenet? Other than that movie Nolan made before Oppenheimer.
A number of conservative YouTube creators got pitched a distro deal where Tenet Media would license their shows and put them on their network (just another youtube channel, afik). Later on, officials in the Biden admin said that the network was backchannel funded by some people connected to Russia Today. They provided no evidence to the effect, the investigation never went anywhere, and after a week or two, there were no further mentions of it from any government source. Meanwhile, now a bunch of conservative YouTubers are forever branded in the media as being "paid Russian propagandists" because their normal shows were on a different youtube channel for 6 months.

Could be legit. Could just as easily be a USAID-funded spook honeypot in order to discredit anti-Ukraine war righties.
 
Last edited:
Pakistan's only play in an actual war with India is to sell their asses to China. Not great.


A number of conservative YouTube creators got pitched a distro deal where Tenet Media would license their shows and put them on their network (just another youtube channel, afik). Later on, officials in the Biden admin said that the network was backchannel funded by some people connected to Russia Today. They provided no evidence to the effect, the investigation never went anywhere, and after a week or two, there were no further mentions of it from any government source. Meanwhile, now a bunch of conservative YouTubers are forever branded in the media as being "paid Russian propagandists" because their normal shows were on a different youtube channel for 6 months.

Could be legit. Could just as easily be a USAID-funded spook honeypot in order to discredit anti-Ukraine war righties.
I remember a few notalable breadtubers talking about the tenet thing for a few months.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood
Fear mongering about what could happen
See:
Translation: you have to take a picture of your government ID to access a website.

Which much like 'fourteen days to flatten the curve' will very quickly spiral out into every website everywhere regardless of content on said site.

It'll be the death of pseudonymity/anonymity. To retards who think 'well they know who you are anyways!' is a valid counterargument, they at least have to put in the bare minimum effort to pretend you're worthy of a warrant to weaponize back-end information against you. With this, Shaniqua from the Bureau Of Internet Communications can see every website you've ever been to at a moment's notice without even the hint of the figleaf of 'due process'.
You and people like you refusing to understand that handing power to the government isn't an argument about whether or not
the left can and will exploit anything and everything
and more about the inevitable result of your myopic drive to do shit in the worst and most hamfisted way possible in absence of reason is a danger to the populace that is rivaled only by your equally myopic, equally nonsensical, and equally reactionary opposition that similarly doesn't care for actual consequences as long as they get what they impulsively yearn for in policy against all reason.

You are no different than leftists who want illegal immigration or increased legal immigration, in that regard.

If you give a shit about online porn and how it affects kids do understand that neither that problem nor the societal rot that causes such shit is equivalent to the real damage enabling ID-checking for using websites will do to your own political aims.

You will unleash a genie you will desperately want to put back in the bottle for how hard it will fuck your ass immediately upon being loosed on the populace.

If you want to talk about methods that would actually have an effect without giving the government a much-desired capacity to fuck over nationalist, anti legal immigration, anti illegal immigration, and more importantly pro-white, sentiment we can have the conversation as rational adults. Anyone seriously considering such measures as what's proposed in the recent 'anti-porn bill' as anything other than a not-so-cryptic power grab by the people who hate both you and the retards who voted for Biden is not someone worth considering as a serious, rational adult human including you.
 
lolbertarians want to live in an country that the founders would've never wanted to make, based on a definition of "freedom" that never existed in human history and backed by a weak, limp wristed power structure that is incapable of doing anything meaningful and would be toppled in an afternoon.
View attachment 7345586
The founding fathers explicitly didn't want a wimpy government, because the absolute mess that was the very short time under the Articles of Confederation showed exactly how awful such a system was.
 
You and people like you refusing to understand that handing power to the government isn't an argument about whether or not
and more about the inevitable result of your myopic drive to do shit in the worst and most hamfisted way possible in absence of reason is a danger to the populace that is rivaled only by your equally myopic, equally nonsensical, and equally reactionary opposition that similarly doesn't care for actual consequences as long as they get what they impulsively yearn for in policy against all reason.

"We're waiting to institute mandatory ID to use the internet until the Republicans pass legislation to regulate the distribution of porn. We absolutely refuse to do it until then!" -Zero Democrats
 
lolbertarians want to live in an country that the founders would've never wanted to make, based on a definition of "freedom" that never existed in human history and backed by a weak, limp wristed power structure that is incapable of doing anything meaningful and would be toppled in an afternoon.
View attachment 7345586
I have never meat as lolbertarian that didn't have “interesting” thoughts on age of consent
 
The next democratic national primary is gonna be so fun to watch. We got Newsome out there calling to keep men out of women's sports, and Ro Khanna saying things like:
"What Democrats should start every speech with is: 'America is the greatest country in the world. It's the most open country in the world. It's the least racist country in the world, and we want to make it better,'" Khanna asserted.

The fun part is the Dems may be at the point where they are willing to hear this stuff out but definitely not at the point where they will let it win. They will get the entire woke playbook thrown at them.
 
Back