Cram it, you only give a shit about the law if you can use it to hurt Americans.
Then you're a fool, and you have no imagination.
It's not just porn sites, it's any site with user generated content where porn could potentially be shared. That includes this one. That includes Google or any search engine. Plebbit, Twatter, Kikebook, you name it.
Burning the flag isn't speech but it's protected by the First Amendment.
This is a bad argument; the protection is arguably only true because it's seen as a left-wing activity.
You can't argue anything based on this.
Kill yourself nigger. Respond to what I actually posted or don't quote me. Don't make up some strawman quote that makes your faggy little argument sound better in your head and then include it in your retarded post.
you're really gonna avoid that question? it's pretty simple dude
that's a problem with the legislation not the idea
porn is legally not protected under the first amendment and has no legal right to exist as confirmed by SCOTUS.
It's interesting how when liberals call cuckservatives racist for wanting to stop illegal immigration, closeted faggots for not wanting gay marriage, or misogynists/incels for not wanting abortion to be legally unlimited in scope using the same logic it's easy as anything for you types to see that it's illogical horseshit.
Less than ten years ago people could have pulled an article saying that you had a constitutional right to an abortion I fundamentally doubt you would have treated that as the be all end all to that particular argument.
Exactly. "Don't worry letting the government require ID for online access to pornography won't lead to anything else, like say ID for access to search engines or ID for access to certain websites"
I'd rather economically crush them but if this results in a better deal for us then it's fine I suppose.
