Inactive John S. Bulla / @Paul45thomas / @BullaStephen / @StephenBulla - "God's only friend"

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMG_7964.jpg

IMG_7963.jpg
 
How comes John and Nick Bate did pretty much the same crime but John got 10 years in the slammer whereas Nick will rot in there until old age?

I suppose the 20+ year gap between the two sentences could be the reason, but I am not sure.

Basically different times, but also different states will have different sentencing terms for similar crimes, and if he was tried in front of a jury they may have given sentencing suggestions to the judge based on their perceptions if John the Violator.

Or should we call him John the Rapist? I feel like if this thread is going to get big we need to come up with a pet name for him, kinda like how we call Chris Our Pet Lolcow, the various names we call Phil/ADF, and how we call Phil's "girlfriend" Slingblade. What with John's religious nuttery a play on John the Baptist or John the Revelator seems appropriate.
 
Welp. I've got a flight coming up soon. I'll try to get through as much of this as I can and write up some notes for the rest of yall, as I'm certain this is a venture into serious TL;DR territory.
He didn't write the book, as I said in my other post. "WOL" in the link likely stands for "Way of the Lord" and it's a sect of the LDS. It's just a collection of messages supposedly given by John the Baptist to Otto Fetting and W. A. Draves from 1927 to 1994.

There's a Wikipedia article you can see about it here it has bits about both Fetting and Draves.

It's just another weird cult, basically, but he didn't write it. I don't know what context it's linked on his website, but if he claims it's his then he's straight up lying. The text in the pdf even credits Fetting and Draves as having writing the "received messages".
 
He didn't write the book, as I said in my other post. "WOL" in the link likely stands for "Way of the Lord" and it's a sect of the LDS. It's just a collection of messages supposedly given by John the Baptist to Otto Fetting and W. A. Draves from 1927 to 1994.

There's a Wikipedia article you can see about it here it has bits about both Fetting and Draves.

It's just another weird cult, basically, but he didn't write it. I don't know what context it's linked on his website, but if he claims it's his then he's straight up lying. The text in the pdf even credits Fetting and Draves as having writing the "received messages".
He claims Draves appointed him to be the new leader of Church of Christ With the Elijah Message shortly before dying. It's on like, page 4.
 
He claims Draves appointed him to be the new leader of Church of Christ With the Elijah Message shortly before dying. It's on like, page 4.
I looked through the entire thing and he did not add any new messages then. Page 276 ends with the last message from Draves. I didn't read every line of text, but I read all the openings and closes include by Draves and Fetting. I didn't see anything that indicated it had been altered. I did skip the beginning because the font was fucking tiny though. So I must have missed that tiny bit. Guess the only bits worth really checking are the first few pages!
 
He didn't write the book, as I said in my other post. "WOL" in the link likely stands for "Way of the Lord" and it's a sect of the LDS. It's just a collection of messages supposedly given by John the Baptist to Otto Fetting and W. A. Draves from 1927 to 1994.

There's a Wikipedia article you can see about it here it has bits about both Fetting and Draves.

It's just another weird cult, basically, but he didn't write it. I don't know what context it's linked on his website, but if he claims it's his then he's straight up lying. The text in the pdf even credits Fetting and Draves as having writing the "received messages".

He claims Draves appointed him to be the new leader of Church of Christ With the Elijah Message shortly before dying. It's on like, page 4.

I looked through the entire thing and he did not add any new messages then. Page 276 ends with the last message from Draves. I didn't read every line of text, but I read all the openings and closes include by Draves and Fetting. I didn't see anything that indicated it had been altered. I did skip the beginning because the font was fucking tiny though. So I must have missed that tiny bit. Guess the only bits worth really checking are the first few pages!
I gotta try this. Steal a book, change one thing in the beginning and make it mine. Profit.
 
I am surprised he has access to internet and has no law enforcement observing his internet. I remember Ederem got sent back to prison for violating his decades old release by having a computer.
Part of Edarem's problem was that he was very obviously attempting to associate with underage people through his YouTube channel and didn't put any restraints on who could view it, like only 18+ or similar. He was developing a sort of cult following among young adults and kids. The courts didn't immediately throw him in jail for running the channel, either. They told him to get offline and stay offline. He interpreted that to mean that he should continue to make online content, and have his weird friend/wife/transmonkey lover post it online for him. The courts found this approach inappropriate and tossed him back in jail for violating conditions of his release and for failing to register as sex offender appropriately when he moved from one state to the next.

Edarem's "Pretty Woman" video is straight-up nightmare fuel. I'd link to it but his clearly unhinged widow(er) has it set up so it doesn't play in most of the developed world. His lucidity made him so much scarier than John.

John is in no danger of attracting anyone except trolls. He may not be permitted to be online - not sure about the nature of his release - but he's so demented and gross and unfunny that kids aren't gonna be into him ironically so maybe no one is concerned about him wandering the Internet. His very existence is a form of deterrent.
Another potential factor is the nature of their respective charges and the risk of offenders using the technology to re-offend. Bulla was convicted of incest and aggravated incest, and the courts probably reasoned that it is extremely difficult to commit incest by soliciting strangers on the internet.
 
I thought he was laminating all his crazy but then I realized he fucking wraps it up in scotch tape

Jesus Christ for some reason that really amps up the psycho factor

Late, but it gets even creepier. He uses scotch tape and plastic sleeves, because you know he "sleeps" with the pages, and spunk ruins that paper pretty quick so he came up with some schizo way to preserve his precious page girls so he could use them to masturbate over and over with. Shudder.
 
Late, but it gets even creepier. He uses scotch tape and plastic sleeves, because you know he "sleeps" with the pages, and spunk ruins that paper pretty quick so he came up with some schizo way to preserve his precious page girls so he could use them to masturbate over and over with. Shudder.

So... he owns a laminator?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sparklemilhouse
He didn't write the book, as I said in my other post. "WOL" in the link likely stands for "Way of the Lord" and it's a sect of the LDS. It's just a collection of messages supposedly given by John the Baptist to Otto Fetting and W. A. Draves from 1927 to 1994.

Oh, dang. I missed the earlier post, sorry. Well, so much for that form of entertainment...
 
"Divorced through no fault of my own"...except me forcibly sodomizing my underaged stepdaughter, but that was actually my evil demonic clone who I once saw at a Pizza Hut. It may have been my reflection in the bathroom mirror, but you can't prove that. Now let's talk about how holy I am even though I only talk about how I want to fuck beautiful women. What's that? Who are you calling a skeevy, perverted, delusional creep? You can't possibly mean me, even though I'm the only other person here. The magic voices that only I can hear because I'm God's chosen prophet on Earth tell me that I'm a good, handsome person who deserves to fuck all the beautiful women like Katy Perry, Kaley Cuoco, and all the other sexy women I see in my hundreds of magazines like Playboy, Cosmo, and Sports Illustrated.
 
"Divorced through no fault of my own"...except me forcibly sodomizing my underaged stepdaughter, but that was actually my evil demonic clone who I once saw at a Pizza Hut. It may have been my reflection in the bathroom mirror, but you can't prove that. Now let's talk about how holy I am even though I only talk about how I want to fuck beautiful women. What's that? Who are you calling a skeevy, perverted, delusional creep? You can't possibly mean me, even though I'm the only other person here. The magic voices that only I can hear because I'm God's chosen prophet on Earth tell me that I'm a good, handsome person who deserves to fuck all the beautiful women like Katy Perry, Kaley Cuoco, and all the other sexy women I see in my hundreds of magazines like Playboy, Cosmo, and Sports Illustrated.

Something tells me this guy knows where a body or two is buried.
 
So he believes these women were created to be with him but at least he is semi realistic in the fact that he makes personal ads and maybe somehow realizes that he isn't going to end up with Kate Upton. Then on the other side of the coin he thinks if you are on a TV show with a woman and aren't fondling/raping her you are gay. He has attraction signs, a kind of medallion thing going on, hates men. This guy is gold, Jerry. Gold.

He said he was married to a woman who looked like Kate Upton but skinnier. Then there was a post earlier that said the woman was enormously fat. Hmm. Who to believe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back