Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who would win in a fight?

  • Ethan Klein

    Votes: 291 3.9%
  • Sam Hyde

    Votes: 7,175 96.1%

  • Total voters
    7,466
I just want denims to actually sue him so we can learn whether that CPS call actually happened as he said or not. Ethan’s a huge fucking liar and either has the memory of a goldfish, dementia, or legitimately cannot keep his story straight because he’s bad at lying.

His skull story immediately fell apart the moment people started scratching at the surface of it. I wanna know who or why CPS called, if it even happened, so that way he can stop blaming everyone but himself for being lower than bird shit on a hot car windshield.
if she sues him that would be gold. she would be completely in financial ruin, and if he countersues even, her life would be over. if there's anyone with experience in winning legal battles on youtube, it's ethan. This would also directly prove the wrong doing of the extreme left. I know he's sueing bad empanada too, but that must be tricky since the guy is in argentine.
 
if there's anyone with experience in winning legal battles on youtube, it's ethan.
Not sure if this is a sarcastic post or not, but Ethan won a single fair-use lawsuit because the law was squarely on his side. Ethan doesn't have "experience" with lawsuits, he's not a lawyer.

He already invited a defamation lawsuit against him which was 100% avoidable which recently passed the anti-slapp motion.
 
He already invited a defamation lawsuit against him which was 100% avoidable which recently passed the anti-slapp motion.
The Kavanaugh suit if anything is a learning experience for ethan there's nothing actionable regarding what he's said about denims. that cease and desist she sent him is pathetic
 
  • Like
Reactions: RollerGator
there's nothing actionable regarding what he's said about denims
"She's directly responsible for CPS coming to my house... doing what she did being like 'oh let's call CPS he's an abuser, he neglects his children, like we need to, we need to call CPS' "

Ethan said this about Denims to an audience of tens of thousands of people. This is not an opinion statement. He's characterizing Denims as doing stochastic terrorism to call CPS to his house when in reality she responded to a chatter and said "obviously don't call CPS". Ethan knows this and yet, he said that. The screenshot which he used to link Denims to the CPS call is also doctored, he knows that, he didn't retract it, he in fact used it after finding out it was doctored. He made definitive statements linking people to the CPS call after admitting he has no clue who did it in the Hasan debate, he should know this is damaging. Denims claims to be constantly receiving messages calling her the "CPS girl". She's undeniably receiving reputational damages and you can even see the repercussions of that in Kiwi farms posts.

Remember, defamation is Ethan Klein's MO.
He gets dupper's delight doing defamation. He did it to Ryan Cavanaugh.
When Dan Saltman decided to set up a dogpille gay op against twitch to take down Dan Clancy, Ethan Klein jumped in and was calling Dan Clancy a pedophile several shows in a row.
Now here's the thing about Denims; Ethan started hating Denims 2 months before the CPS call, for reasons that are completely unrelated; Denims made a response to EK's "Content Nuke" against Hasan. After Denims rebuked his claims regarding that, Ethan Klein went off, Denims has a montage of his reaction in the beginning of her video:

That was 1 month before the CPS call.
Mind you, EK exists in a very sensitive leftists community where people specifically told him to not say "bitch".
EK has decided he hated Denims and would destroy her 1 month before the CPS call. The CPS call is nothing but an opportunity for him to tear her apart. He straight up admitted in the Hasan debate he has no idea who called CPS on him. He said it was the snark subreddit, he said it was Denims, he said it was Bad Empanada, he also said he's "pretty sure" Bad Empanada is behind the skull shipped to his house, there's no way he actually believes this. It's all defamation, it's all just an opportunity to destroy people he doesn't like, just like linking Dan Clancy's boobie streamers that showed up in his frontpage to "pedophilia".
 
Last edited:
Total Talmudic Domination

On one hand Islam worships a pedophile, on the other hand the Talmud condones pedophilia.

Mishna.webp

Niddah.44b.webp

Age3.webp

ChildMarriage.webp

ChildBride.webp

Epstein.webp

SpielBerg.webp

Woody.webp

JewishAmericaPedophiles.webp

LegalFailures.webp

PedoSanctuary.webp

KingDavid.webp

Virgin.webp

YoungVirgin.webp

Mohel.webp

Circumcision.webp

Herpes.webp

OralSuction.webp

NewYorkSuctionAgreement.webp
 
EK has decided he hated Denims and would destroy her 1 month before the CPS call. The CPS call is nothing but an opportunity for him to tear her apart. He straight up admitted in the Hasan debate he has no idea who called CPS on him. He said it was the snark subreddit, he said it was Denims, he said it was Bad Empanada, he also said he's "pretty sure" Bad Empanada is behind the skull shipped to his house, there's no way
This is the biggest reason why I hope she actually files the suit. While in a vacuum it's sympathetic that a man who's "kids are being fucked with by CPS" is acting erratically (nevermind the possibility it's a legitimate issue that they got a tip about), that doesn't make it okay to just wildly accuse everyone he's currently feuding with of being responsible, then walk that back when directly pushed on it because he rightly realizes that makes him look unhinged, then push on and continue claiming that anyway after definitively claiming you don't know who did it.

He's muddied the waters, and in a case that as a matter of procedure, he has no idea who's actually made the call reporting him. However you feel about Denims or Bad Empanada, at the very least it's dishonest to be implying it's their fault, when even in his accounting of events, their viewers were sending in tips about things HE said! At no point in any of this has he tried to take any ownership, or reflect on how he presents himself and his family online to his massive audience might have consequences to his personal, private life. In fact he's doubled down! He brings his kids on to a livestream, while he's engaged in this blood feud, I can't even begin to describe how retarded and self-destructive that is.

I don't care that Denims is a dumb socialist whore or whatever. Frankly I don't know who the fuck she is, but whatever her retardrd leftist viewpoint is, it doesn't give Ethan carte blanche to smear her and anyone else, like some people ITT seem to believe it does. The fact he's still litigating the CPS call after he said in his own words he doesn't know who did it certainly has made her case a little more substantive, and I hope she gets a good lawyer that will bring that up.
 
The problem Denims has with any case is that he never said 'Denims called CPS' so there is no case for defamation. Nothing Ethan said is defamation per-se, which means any defamation would have to have provable damage, which Denims, by her own admission, does not have, she's talked about how she's had more views!

Furthermore, Denims is almost certainly a public figure for the purposes of the lawsuit, which means they'd have to prove actual malice on Ethan's actual statements, which I also don't think they can do.

Further, I would recommend people never listen to Pisco, he's a certified legal retard.

If you really think Ethan is smearing people carte blanche and things like that, you should more than anything else want Denims not to sue, because she will get blown the fuck out and ethan will be emboldened (Good outcomes for me, as I find retards like ethan flailing funny + content and Denims is a stupid bitch so her losing is inherently funny)
 
Denims has with any case is that he never said 'Denims called CPS'

Ethan Klein said that Denims said that CPS should be called. She never say that, it's defamation per-se.
In the comments that are not directly defamation, the charitable reading is that Ethan is accusing Denims is carrying out stochastic terrorism by telling her audience to do it, that is also defamation because she never did that. You won't find a single clip of her supporting a CPS call against Ethan Klein, not even indirectly. You can infer malice as Ethan used a doctored evidence against Denims after being informed that it was fake and misleading; there's also a moment in the podcast where his employee defends Denims and informs him that "she never actually said to call CPS", so he had knowledge of the falsehood.

The real problem with a lawsuit is the inability to demonstrate damages. Denims grew much faster and made money by interacting with EK.
Even though I believe her reputation was damaged, she has no receipts for clear financial damage.
1747254562674.webp

The Lawsuit with Kavanaugh might be worst for Ethan since Kavanaugh is a high-stakes businessman and might be able to substantiate heavy damages due to his reputation being tarnished. Ethan's lawyer is aware of this and just filed a supreme court appeal on his case.
 
Ethan Klein said that Denims said that CPS should be called. She never say that, it's defamation per-se.
In the comments that are not directly defamation, the charitable reading is that Ethan is accusing Denims is carrying out stochastic terrorism by telling her audience to do it, that is also defamation because she never did that. You won't find a single clip of her supporting a CPS call against Ethan Klein, not even indirectly. You can infer malice as Ethan used a doctored evidence against Denims after being informed that it was fake and misleading; there's also a moment in the podcast where his employee defends Denims and informs him that "she never actually said to call CPS", so he had knowledge of the falsehood.

The real problem with a lawsuit is the inability to demonstrate damages. Denims grew much faster and made money by interacting with EK.
Even though I believe her reputation was damaged, she has no receipts for clear financial damage.
View attachment 7362357

The Lawsuit with Kavanaugh might be worst for Ethan since Kavanaugh is a high-stakes businessman and might be able to substantiate heavy damages due to his reputation being tarnished. Ethan's lawyer is aware of this and just filed a supreme court appeal on his case.
You don't know what defamation per se is. Saying 'Denims said that CPS should be called' is not defamation per-se.

She has no case.
 
Look either way Ethan needs to get his fucking story straight. I don't care if it's legally actionable or not, you don't just go around vaguely accusing people of calling CPS on you, and using it as your causus belli and shield from criticism for being unhinged, launching a harrassment campaign, all while having no proof any of the people he's fingering are responsible.

Whenever it's time to flame people on his show or on instagram stories it's "They're taking my keeeeeedz", and then when directly pushed on it its "uh idk, who knows dude". That should be the end of discussion here no? Typical jew tactics as usual.
 
Gem I found on the snark subreddits:

Lena from the H3 podcast finds out in real time that the top donor of the h3 podcast is not on their side, by hearing the username being mentioned on a VOD they're criticizing.



The shout outs to this user in the h3 podcast:

 
The Lawsuit with Kavanaugh might be worst for Ethan since Kavanaugh is a high-stakes businessman and might be able to substantiate heavy damages due to his reputation being tarnished. Ethan's lawyer is aware of this and just filed a supreme court appeal on his case.

Speaking of kavanaugh Ethan is appealing to the California supreme court, unlike the appellate courts of appeal that was required to hear the case and which was then subsequently denied and reaffirmed, the CA supreme court is not required to hear the case and has a 97% rejection rate. They will take one look at it and send it back down to the lower courts. btw ethan has NOT SAID ONE WORD ABOUT THIS, strange the mf who cant seem to shut up is non-verbal on this topic.

1747273458303.webp

Ethan already "lost" the federal copyright lawsuit, I put lost in quotations because it was eventually settled out of court but he had to pay a small fine and had to cover his own costs according to him (settlement agreements are usually not public), triller which was suing him was in the middle of an acquisition and wanted to clear house on its liabilities so they washed their hands of that lawsuit but it was on its way to trial after the federal version of anti-slapp was denied. Ethan claimed that he "won" the lawsuit when that is just not true, he had to pay 100s of thousands in legal fees as it had already taken years of back and forth in federal court until it was settled.

Knowing how ethan has disposable income and is willing to drag out legal battles for years, I can see why denims didn't want to file suit and I'm not entirely sure what the outcome would have been, you can win a lawsuit thats awarded $1 in damages just to get the court to agree with you that yes ethan defamed you and I don't see how that would change anything. Not sure why she made the announcement or tried to crowdfund seems a bit sloppy on her part but nevertheless she's apparently refunding the donos and she gave ethan a taste of his own medicine. He's sent out multiple retraction demand letters/dmcas and you are required to do so within a certain time frame if you want to file suit in the future ofc within the statute of limitations after the fact, I think it's like 1-2 years. So as of now she can file suit or a countersuit if ethan files one against her in the future (ethan has been threatening to sue her for months now) since she did submit the retraction demand letter within 20 days. Ethan has done the same to multiple people over frivolous shit like making a youtube video criticizing him or uploading a 1 min clip to reddit, he has not filed suit he's just letting it hang over their heads as some type of intimidation tactic.

1747274552158.webp
 
Those two don't weaponize their audience against the people who leave them mean comments and their families.
in a tard tier list, hamas diddy piker is c for how dangerously retarded he is and how big of a cult he's managed to gather, "bomb the vatican haha" klein is usually somewhere around b, but this current patch made him "A" with the cps and idubbs shit giving him and his team sympathy, however expect him to be nerfed to b eventually. idubbz is s automatically because he's just a non factor. nobody gives a fuck about him and anybody that did he systematically uncontrollably shits on, and is probably in the midst of crying into his pillow about anti onlyfans comments as i type this while anisa is more and more likely fucking someone else.

however imo h3 *is* better exclusively because he has a fucking spine and SOMETHING that he believes and just tells people "no fuck you i think this" instead of following the red or blue bible or twitter. hasan, his cult, and by extension idubbz would be hitler one week and the allies the next.

of course inshallah they all are cleansed, or brought to the light and see how much radicalization they made and work to fix it, or they just all eat each other, with h3h3 being the last to eat but suffering a grievous wound in the process
 
Back