- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
@Google Drive didn't even join until 2024. You can't stick it on him.He was able to download the files ... From Google Drive ... Not from the farms.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Google Drive didn't even join until 2024. You can't stick it on him.He was able to download the files ... From Google Drive ... Not from the farms.
I'm reading it now, so far it's better written than most of his other filings. I almost suspect he had help with it. Still wrong, but at least coherent.
Yeah, it definitely doesn't scream "retard with a participation trophy paralegal degree." It screams "the retard figured out ChatGPT" or "one of those tranny lawyers helping Alyssa Mercunty got in touch off the record."It really does seem like he had somebody help him. It's got stuff that's like, almost correct, instead of just being his usual unhinged tirades.
Would I had the time or inclination to use a WestLaw account to check his citations. I’m sure Hardin is ahead of me on that thought, at any rate.It really does seem like he had somebody help him. It's got stuff that's like, almost correct, instead of just being his usual unhinged tirades.
The only thing that he gets right is the whole part about how you aren't allowed a second MTD except on the parts that change. The problem is.... he changed a whole bunch of stuff, including what survived the 10th's remanding.
He did briefly mention it at the very endNowhere in that response does he say why copyright infringement itself has caused injury. He does spend alot of time talking about injury from causes of action that are already dismissed though.
I know we aren't privy to every discovery request, but I'm kind of annoyed we haven't seen Hardin demand receipts showing how much Greer made selling individual songs from 2019-2025. He's chasing down alternate theories of damages, but this is a basic baseline for damages that can easily be shown or discredited.However, he has never managed to sell any of his musical works, and nobody buys digital single songs anymore. And, of course, spotify offers cents (if even that) for a listen
Good enough for a D- I supposed. He signed his name properly and mentioned the thing once. Normally I would say this still wouldn't pass, but alas, I have been disappointed far too many times in this case with how much leeway the court will grant Russel. On the plus side though, there are far more pressing issues for Greer that can end. Mainly the Venue and Discovery shenanigans. He is correct that Null availed himself of Jurisdiction in the outset of the case. But Greer's willful lies to the court after the case was transferred were not excusable. Holding out a dead man as "willing and eager to testify" is a pretty deep pit to get out of, and saying "I could have done better" may not be enough.He did briefly mention it at the very end
View attachment 7357284
However, he has never managed to sell any of his musical works, and nobody buys digital single songs anymore. And, of course, spotify offers cents (if even that) for a listen
None, because of those dang dirty kiwifarmers and their dang hardships!I know we aren't privy to every discovery request, but I'm kind of annoyed we haven't seen Hardin demand receipts showing how much Greer made selling individual songs from 2019-2025.
10th Circuit found that Kiwi Farms was liable for contributory copyright infringement,
As a reminder: Kiwi Farms isn’t based in New Zealand
The facts of the amended Complaint mirror the original Complaint that it is still a replica.
By Defendants’ own admission, there are 100,000 pages on plaintiff. Those pages more than likely have copyrighted material. Obviously, sifting through every page would not be economical.
Adverse Interference
Might actually be relevant to the case as kiwi is a term for New Zealander, probably why New Zealand thought they had jurisdiction, and to this day people call kiwifarms "New Zealand 4Chan" because the name and the news coverage about the Christchurch shooter have lead to that misconception