Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%

  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%

  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%

  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.3%

  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%
  • Total voters
    462
how the fuck did this nigger go from 99% battery to SEVEN just taking screenshots?

1747158069229.webp
1747158096921.webp

Also can't Hardin subpoena Greer's account name? It's probably Russtard.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Windy Moors, Not a bee, Fetch! and 34 others
Russhole's constant "defendants don't get to..." whinging and his endless quoting of that Mother Jones article as if it was established law make me want to pimp-slap him until his facial nerves grow back.

He doesn't even quote the good bits, such as "he said he was taking a shit (not hiding) when she arrived".

ConSluttant said:
And, of course, to add insult to injury, Greer obviously believes that Jersh should bend the knee to any foreign governmental authority, never mind American sovereignty and the FIRST FUCKING AMENDMENT of the damn Constitution because FUCK NEW ZEALAND.

View attachment 7357247
Click to expand...
jesus wept, it was just an edgy email to some bureaucrat (from a foreign, antipodean country without any effective jurisdiction or power over nool or A Website, no less), not the fucking Braveheart scene sycophants try to make it to be from time to time. Now we have retards trying to pass it as an argument in legal filings.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Windy Moors, Not a bee, Justice Tony and 17 others
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
how the fuck did this nigger go from 99% battery to SEVEN just taking screenshots?

View attachment 7357438
View attachment 7357440

Also can't Hardin subpoena Greer's account name? It's probably Russtard.
Click to expand...
He's taking these screenshots and then giving them to ChatGPT to help him write briefs. He's only taking screens when he runs into a dead end or when ChatGPT indicates some other evidence might be helpful. In the meantime his battery's getting slaughtered.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Not a bee, Belgians in the Congo, Peace Or Love and 7 others
Aligning yourself with Isabella Janke is certainly an interesting ploy. She's also an unhinged piece of filth that wants to be able to harm and exploit people (and animals) with 0 repercussions. She, like you, does not have an inalienable right to have her atrocities forgotten about.

Schrödinger's complaint is cool too. Is it identical to the original complaint (in which case, the revision has just been a complete waste of everybody's time), or does it raise substantially different issues and facts?

Don't just asspull what the "infringements" are. You're the one claiming to have such valuable material stolen. Surely it wouldn't be an uneconomical use of your time to pinpoint the exact people and times concerned in disseminating your priceless masterpieces. Unless of course the timings would present some sort of issue? :smug:
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Not a bee, Fetch!, Justice Tony and 12 others
Useful_Mistake said:
I find no end of amusement in the fact that Greer missed a key part of Mr. Hardin's motion that makes many (if not) all of Russ' objections irrelevant.

Perhaps Mr. Hardin will point it out in his reply
Click to expand...
To be fair, it says right on the bottom of every page: "ChatGPT can make mistakes, so double-check it"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justice Tony, Oliver Onions, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 4 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Perhaps Mr. Hardin will point it out in his reply
Click to expand...

Fourteen days from yesterday, right? So May 26th.

Meanwhile, the [STUFF] is due to be delivered to Hardin by next week, May 20th. An additional week tacked on to that for Hardin to update the judge on whether the [STUFF] was delivered as ordered, May 27th. And then the deadline for Greer to pay the filing fee (which should show on the docket, I would think, since previously-paid fees do), June 5th.

I wouldn't expect the magistrate to move on anything, even if Greer fails to deliver the [STUFF], until after the filing fee is paid or not paid. So there's still a few more weeks for stupid shit to keep piling up while we all watch. And I'm pretty sure it will.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Not a bee, Justice Tony, Quioui and 12 others
LiquidChrisRespecter said:
Schrödinger's complaint is cool too. Is it identical to the original complaint (in which case, the revision has just been a complete waste of everybody's time), or does it raise substantially different issues and facts?
Click to expand...
Wait, did gReer just stumble on the perfect way to avoid the Statue of Limbmotiontaters?

You start a lolsuit that goes on forever, long after the statue is ozymandus'd to dust, and you then attach new defendants at anytime!
 
  • Late
Reactions: Harvey Danger
obsdj said:
Fourteen days from yesterday, right? So May 26th.

Meanwhile, the [STUFF] is due to be delivered to Hardin by next week, May 20th. An additional week tacked on to that for Hardin to update the judge on whether the [STUFF] was delivered as ordered, May 27th. And then the deadline for Greer to pay the filing fee (which should show on the docket, I would think, since previously-paid fees do), June 5th.

I wouldn't expect the magistrate to move on anything, even if Greer fails to deliver the [STUFF], until after the filing fee is paid or not paid. So there's still a few more weeks for stupid shit to keep piling up while we all watch. And I'm pretty sure it will.
Click to expand...
Hardin has been working pretty fast lately. Normally I would say that a successful lawyer probably wants to put this bullshit aside and work on real cases, but considering he has straight up admitted in his email to Greer that he is getting a kick out of this, I'm hopeful we may get a swift reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not a bee, Justice Tony, Belgians in the Congo and 9 others
LiquidChrisRespecter said:
Is it identical to the original complaint (in which case, the revision has just been a complete waste of everybody's time), or does it raise substantially different issues and facts?
Click to expand...
I just skimmed Count 1 and it's totally different. New allegations based on the 10th, etc. The header is still "Contributory Copyright Infringement" but the actual allegations appear to be totally different.
Count 2 is new. I think Greer tried to argue adding Lolcow was just a formality but as he adds them as a new defendant that whole section is a new count.
I thought about trying to do a redline but all of Count 1 and 2 would be red.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Not a bee, ShinyStar, ConSluttant and 7 others
Harambe said:
He's taking these screenshots and then giving them to ChatGPT to help him write briefs. He's only taking screens when he runs into a dead end or when ChatGPT indicates some other evidence might be helpful. In the meantime his battery's getting slaughtered.
Click to expand...
I don't think it has the style of ChatGPT. It's more like Russ wrote a screed and paid someone else to clean up the sentence structure and formatting.

1747160307135.webp

Bits like this are dribbled throughout. The one-word sentences aren't common to AI output. The rest is classic Greer; almost-correct but slightly convoluted grammar and tense mangling. It's cleaned up to remove the embarrassing mistakes, but the underlying structure is there.

Some of it comes close to AI phrasing, but to get there Greer would have had to be really clever with telling the AI to impersonate him in the 1st person, or he would have had to go back and clean up a lot of the way it structures answers. I don't believe Russell "Bare Minimum" Greer is industrious enough to do that, at all.

1747160670275.webp


I don't think I've ever seen an AI speak both colloquially and in the "just so" arrogance at the same time. Both are classic Greer. And I don't know how you could wrangle a prompt so even the most retarded AI concludes that an address on a letter means the sender was feeling negative economic effects from a legal concept. The content and structure of the last two sentences sounds like Greer, but the phrasing is cleaned up.

I wonder if that emergency "business meeting" was actually with someone providing legal aid or writing help. In 285-4, Greer claimed "It was indeed a business meeting I was there. Also a city meeting too." So there may have been two reasons Russ wanted to skip the hearing. If the city meeting wasn't a surprise, then maybe his ghost writer told him he was only free to help on that day.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Not a bee, Justice Tony, Clovis and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back