Aligning yourself with Isabella Janke is certainly an interesting ploy. She's also an unhinged piece of filth that wants to be able to harm and exploit people (and animals) with 0 repercussions. She, like you, does not have an inalienable right to have her atrocities forgotten about.
Schrödinger's complaint is cool too. Is it identical to the original complaint (in which case, the revision has just been a complete waste of everybody's time), or does it raise substantially different issues and facts?
Don't just asspull what the "infringements" are. You're the one claiming to have such valuable material stolen. Surely it wouldn't be an uneconomical use of your time to pinpoint the exact people and times concerned in disseminating your priceless masterpieces. Unless of course the timings would present some sort of issue?