- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
The implication is that you, the reader, are the 4th.View attachment 7358057
> "In fact, 4 people have commited suicide as a result of Kiwi Farms' hate campaigns"
> Lists only 3 people
> Quoted article only lists 3 people
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The implication is that you, the reader, are the 4th.View attachment 7358057
> "In fact, 4 people have commited suicide as a result of Kiwi Farms' hate campaigns"
> Lists only 3 people
> Quoted article only lists 3 people
Fuck, Null better not find out about this.
View attachment 7358057
> "In fact, 4 people have commited suicide as a result of Kiwi Farms' hate campaigns"
> Lists only 3 people
> Quoted article only lists 3 people
Doesn't have to make sense, just has to look long and "professional" enough that the District judge (who isn't paying attention and doesn't care) will look at it and go "yeah looks like the retarded pro se fuckwit is doing his job, what's everyone's problem?" and tard guard him. He was basically Gish Galloping the legal filing here.From reading through the crap he sent in, if we take away the parts that are straight up lies, misunderstandings, and misapplications, I honestly don't see anything left that is even close to enough to properly counter the motion for dismissal. If he manages to keep it from being dismissed it will be by divine intervention.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm feeling bullish, opening up long positions, the works. GREER/MOON 2026. FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS!"Your Honor, there are half a dozen exit ramps available, optional and/or mandatory. Permission to wait until you choose one or blow past them all."
It doesn't work that way. He has to specify each specific infringement with clear links to it.
4 years into it and this still has not really happened so...maybe not?It doesn't work that way. He has to specify each specific infringement with clear links to it.
EMERGENCY Motion to Extend Deadline incoming?
can't wait for the judge to be lore dropped .View attachment 7358057
> "In fact, 4 people have commited suicide as a result of Kiwi Farms' hate campaigns"
> Lists only 3 people
> Quoted article only lists 3 people
He spends a large chunk of his motion addressing the old claims and completely fails to address the new claims that he needed to address.I find no end of amusement in the fact that Greer missed a key part of Mr. Hardin's motion that makes many (if not) all of Russ' objections irrelevant.
I don't think it was someone who was a lawyer, but it was someone with some legal experience in some manner. It makes tactically good arguments with references to relevant case law and precedence, but strategically it is fucking retarded.It really does seem like he had somebody help him. It's got stuff that's like, almost correct, instead of just being his usual unhinged tirades.
The funniest part about the ILJ is that she couldn't have sued the KF for copyright she could have sued the KF for defamation even though a lot of the stuff said about her was in fact true.Surely, Hardin won't have to explain to the judge who ILJ is right? The letter itself says it's not a takedown notice so Russ' claim that users get to vote on keeping copyrighted materials is a fucking lie. but so is his claim that ILJ is a "random individual".
I don't hate the guy, we all want to talk about this case after all. And he turned out to be right in this instance, but paranoia keeps you alive in all situations.I would blame @obsdj for contributing to reminding Greer of the deadline, but Hardin also reminded Greer in his emails with him. C’est la vie. We could’ve had the case dismissed.
It is Defendants’ hope that this extension will allow the Court time to rule upon the pending motions listed above, will allow Mr. Greer time to comply with this Court’s orders at ECF No. 283... and will allow Defendants time to investigate the issues set forth herein and file a fulsome and helpful Reply Brief.
It's not relevant to the case so there isn't any benefit to Hardin litigating a defamation case in a copyright case. He can just call Rusties claims scurrilous and move on.can't wait for the judge to be lore dropped .
probably won't care.
I did enjoy the "Jurisdiction is proper because of these cases..." and both were about physical goods. The Zippo test also fails as the the case Soma Medical International v. Standard Chartered Bank shows.I don't think it was someone who was a lawyer, but it was someone with some legal experience in some manner. It makes tactically good arguments with references to relevant case law and precedence, but strategically it is fucking retarded.
Why do you have to nitpick every singleView attachment 7358057
> "In fact, 4 people have commited suicide as a result of Kiwi Farms' hate campaigns"
> Lists only 3 people
> Quoted article only lists 3 people
Last time he called it very relevant.It's not relevant to the case so there isn't any benefit to Hardin litigating a defamation case in a copyright case. He can just call Rusties claims scurrilous and move on.
There have been attempts to strike this sort of stuff multiple times and each time its been denied.Here's hoping in his reply Hardin moves to strike most of Russ's response as unfounded, unproven, malicious, defamatory, once again seeking to re-submit and relitigate claims that have already been dismissed. And that are grossly prejudicial to the defendant.