Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    462
From reading through the crap he sent in, if we take away the parts that are straight up lies, misunderstandings, and misapplications, I honestly don't see anything left that is even close to enough to properly counter the motion for dismissal. If he manages to keep it from being dismissed it will be by divine intervention.
Doesn't have to make sense, just has to look long and "professional" enough that the District judge (who isn't paying attention and doesn't care) will look at it and go "yeah looks like the retarded pro se fuckwit is doing his job, what's everyone's problem?" and tard guard him. He was basically Gish Galloping the legal filing here.
 
"Your Honor, there are half a dozen exit ramps available, optional and/or mandatory. Permission to wait until you choose one or blow past them all."
I don't know about you guys, but I'm feeling bullish, opening up long positions, the works. GREER/MOON 2026. FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS!
 
Wow, the venue must be really proper!
1.webp
2.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I find no end of amusement in the fact that Greer missed a key part of Mr. Hardin's motion that makes many (if not) all of Russ' objections irrelevant.
He spends a large chunk of his motion addressing the old claims and completely fails to address the new claims that he needed to address.

Though I will say this case is such a clusterfuck with what are probably a bunch of conflicting and unclear rules that I think the Judge will have a lot of leeway in regards to this one.
It really does seem like he had somebody help him. It's got stuff that's like, almost correct, instead of just being his usual unhinged tirades.
I don't think it was someone who was a lawyer, but it was someone with some legal experience in some manner. It makes tactically good arguments with references to relevant case law and precedence, but strategically it is fucking retarded.

Also I think the fact that it sounds semi-decent might actually work against Russ. If a Pro-Se plaintiff can file a even slightly decent filing you have to give them less leeway. Or at least it would seem so.
Surely, Hardin won't have to explain to the judge who ILJ is right? The letter itself says it's not a takedown notice so Russ' claim that users get to vote on keeping copyrighted materials is a fucking lie. but so is his claim that ILJ is a "random individual".
The funniest part about the ILJ is that she couldn't have sued the KF for copyright she could have sued the KF for defamation even though a lot of the stuff said about her was in fact true.

It's instance 10 billion of Greer seeing something that happened and thinking it has sort of relevance or connection to his situation, when it is completely different.
I would blame @obsdj for contributing to reminding Greer of the deadline, but Hardin also reminded Greer in his emails with him. C’est la vie. We could’ve had the case dismissed.
I don't hate the guy, we all want to talk about this case after all. And he turned out to be right in this instance, but paranoia keeps you alive in all situations.
 
It is Defendants’ hope that this extension will allow the Court time to rule upon the pending motions listed above, will allow Mr. Greer time to comply with this Court’s orders at ECF No. 283... and will allow Defendants time to investigate the issues set forth herein and file a fulsome and helpful Reply Brief.

Aww, he sounds so optimistic and hopeful. He's copying the judge from the first scheduling hearing, talking about the case as if everything proceeds orderly and neatly like a real lawsuit.

(I know he isn't, it's the tone that tickles me.)
 
I don't think it was someone who was a lawyer, but it was someone with some legal experience in some manner. It makes tactically good arguments with references to relevant case law and precedence, but strategically it is fucking retarded.
I did enjoy the "Jurisdiction is proper because of these cases..." and both were about physical goods. The Zippo test also fails as the the case Soma Medical International v. Standard Chartered Bank shows.
2025-05-13_14-15.webp
2025-05-13_14-17.webp
2025-05-13_14-17_1.webp
Nature and quality of the "commercial activity".

Now, if Greer could convince Null to sell a bundle with a CD of all of Greer's songs and a copy of his book THEN he MIGHT be able to justify jurisdiction.
 
Here's hoping in his reply Hardin moves to strike most of Russ's response as unfounded, unproven, malicious, defamatory, once again seeking to re-submit and relitigate claims that have already been dismissed. And that are grossly prejudicial to the defendant.
There have been attempts to strike this sort of stuff multiple times and each time its been denied.
 
Back