US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like SCOTUS is going to rule in Trump's favor in the IRS/DODGE issue.

The Liberals are screaming about illegitimate courts so I'm guessing the SCOTUS said DODGE can have access to the SS numbers Biden gave to the 11 million illegals he let in over the last 4 years.

Lets just wait for them to release the ruling before we get too excited but it's looking good.
 
Rate me optimistic but I don't feel this will be the case. We've progressed to a point were the gatekeeper types that tarred Nixon have no where near the same reach or power they did back then. Too many people don't trust, won't trust the experts and are teaching their children the same. Also doesn't help the TDS types that the majority of people having children are pro-Trump. Or places like this thread exist where you can see for yourself what Trump was actually like come a decade or two. Wasn't like it was 50 years ago.


Gender is a social construct created by demons like John Money. It doesn't exist outside of the twisted heads of liberal and feminist academics trying to say a goose can be a gander, and a gander can be a goose. Sex is real, tangible, and more than body parts. Doesn't change your stupid bullshit is still stupid.
Future trends
1) Liberal Democracy is inherently antinatalist
2) Whites that are reproducing don't trust the captured institutions so they can't steal children easily
3) Young(esp White)Men see the liberal policies and captured institutions as faggy and retarded.
4) Non-Whites are seeing absolutely ridiculous negative delta TFRs as they get introduced to the roided up Liberal democracy and are just starting to get exposed. Look at how Latin America got fucked over.
5) Look at how much the third world is dependent upon Gibs, and the ones reproducing don't want to give gibs.
 
We dismiss the opinions of 14-year-olds because they are stupid and immature with no realization of consequences. 14-year-olds also think it is cool to do drugs, drink, and emulate what they see on TV because they cannot tell the difference between reality and entertainment.

Any male 14-year-old would have enjoyed this, but that's not the point. The point is that you can be victimized while still enjoying the problematic activity. Somehow people understand this when it comes to girls but have a complete blind side when it comes to boys because of preconceived societal notions. It used to be the case in medieval Europe that women were considered the sexually aggressive sex. In that context, you would be arguing that a hypothetical teenage girl enjoyed it because it's the same exact scenario.
>14-year-olds also think it is cool to do drugs, drink, and emulate what they see on TV...
Correct, and a fairly good point.
>...because they cannot tell the difference between reality and entertainment.
Did you go to SPED school as a kid or were you actually like this/around people like this? Surely you don't mean this literally.
>Any male 14-year-old would have enjoyed this, but
>you can be victimized while still enjoying the problematic activity.
Yes, but not to the point that it warrants the exact same repercussions as a problematic activity you did not enjoy. This is roughly the same as allowing a 14 year old to take booze from your fridge vs forcing vodka down a 14 year old's throat, one thing is very obviously worse than the other.
>It used to be the case in medieval Europe that women were considered the sexually aggressive sex.
How? What? I have never heard about this. Source? Under exactly what conditions?
 
Before Current Year, I heard that hippies are the founders of "political correctness" as it was in the '90s.

Of course since then, "political correctness" has spread and mutated into "social justice"... like a cancer.
The hippies of the 1960s grew up to go to work in universities and NGOs. Those who control the most influential educational and cultural institutions have the power to shape the direction a country will go.
 
You are on, of all websites, Kiwi Farms and openly talking about having fantasies about being raped by a female teacher. Some things should never be talked about openly. You're just digging yourself into a deeper hole.
>openly talking about having fantasies about being raped by a female teacher
I think this is such a common phenomenon that Van Halen wrote a song about it
 
It doesn't help that Fent and opioids are a bitch to get clean of.

Honestly the best solution would be to just build a "hospital" where we bring them and just let them OD would be the best way to deal with the situation. But it's also inhumane so.

If you go that far, why not just use the hospital to let people detox while comatose so they don't have to suffer through the withdrawals? The recovery would still be a bitch but at least their recovery would allow sleep at night without the kicks, cold sweats, vomiting, diarrhea and generally feeling life is actively trying to kill you.
 
Looks like SCOTUS is going to rule in Trump's favor in the IRS/DODGE issue.

The Liberals are screaming about illegitimate courts so I'm guessing the SCOTUS said DODGE can have access to the SS numbers Biden gave to the 11 million illegals he let in over the last 4 years.

Lets just wait for them to release the ruling before we get too excited but it's looking good.
IT’S DOGE YOU FUCKING RETARD FAGGOT. IT’S NOT DODGE. SPELL THE FUCKING WORD RIGHT.
 
Extreme botting and discord raiding by leftist shitstains. This has been going for 10+ years, it's not new.
moot sold 4chan. After this moderation went and got taken over by intelligence agencies since they decided "angry young men" are the biggest threat (not wrong in a sense) but their solution is to suppress dissent, including the kind of dissent that's needed to be funny. It's easy to do, just go full passive-woman style by saying you're unsafe, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
People really need to remember this bit. Not everyone is some fat Ameri-cunt who was brought up on Western values and it's moral system.

The ragheads don't really give a shit about Christian morals as they are not Christian and expecting them to react as such is moronic. Ditto goes for the niggers in Africa who are barely out of the stone age and still in a tribal mindset.

These people respect and understand strength and displays of power and Trump does as well. With ragheads and nigger you need the big stick because that's what they value and understand, trying to reason with them so "everyone just gets along" is fucking stupid and always fails.
They like Trump because he is strong. They respect him, and in turn, they like him. He is a king to them and they treat him as such.

Yugest plane order of all time 160 jets at 200 billion
Boeing being made great again I see.
I'm sure the USSS will go over that plane with a fine tooth comb. The Saudi's ain't that bright they could sneak some sooper seekret spy tech on to it or some delay kill switch.

Plus they're basically just paying for it, it will be built by Boeing...which may indeed be scarier.
They're going to tear it apart anyway to install the defensive systems to make it Air Force One. They aren't just using it stock.
JFK was a bull head imperialist who I fully believe would have launched a nuclear strike on the USSR if Khrushchev hadn't had the sense and foresight to back down.
That's what makes Kennedy based. He called the Soviets bluff by going up to the wire. He fucking won.
 
No. It's powerleveling because you said you don't see anything wrong with little boys having sex with adults.
Conflicts sharply with what I said earlier
"X is bad, but it's retarded to conflate it with Y which is much worse. People will put words in my mouth to say I am pro X/Y if I keep discussing this."
"You are Pro X/Y"

I am tired of this
 
California faces an additional $12-billion budget deficit, Newsom says
Los Angeles Times (archive.ph)
By Taryn Luna
2025-05-14 19:08:13GMT
California is facing an additional $12-billion state budget shortfall next year, a deficit largely caused by overspending and that Gov. Gavin Newsom said was made worse by President Trump’s federal tariff policy.

“California is under assault,” Newsom said. “The United States of America, in many respects, is under assault because we have a president that’s been reckless.”

Newsom unveiled the forecast during a presentation Wednesday of his $321.9-billion revised spending plan that proposes walking back free healthcare for low-income undocumented immigrants, eliminating Medi-Cal benefits for expensive weight loss treatments and cutting back overtime hours for in-home supportive service workers, among dozens of other trims.

The new deficit comes in addition to $27.3 billion in fiscal remedies, including $16.1 billion in cuts and a $7.1-billion withdrawal from the state’s rainy day fund, that lawmakers and the governor already agreed to make in 2025-26.

The overall $39-billion shortfall marks the third year in a row that Newsom and lawmakers have been forced to reduce funding for state programs after dedicating more money than California has available to spend.

Newsom’s proposed cuts
Among the new cuts Newsom put on the table Wednesday is a call to cut back on his signature policy to provide free healthcare coverage to income-eligible undocumented immigrants.

Newsom is proposing freezing new Medi-Cal enrollment for undocumented adult immigrants as of Jan. 1 and requiring those over 18 to pay $100 monthly premiums to receive healthcare coverage through Medi-Cal.

The cost share will reduce the financial burden on the state and could lower the total number of people enrolled in the healthcare program if some immigrants cannot afford the new premiums. Freezing enrollment may prevent the price tag of the program from continuing to balloon after more people signed up for coverage than the state anticipated.

The changes offer minor savings of $116.5 million next year, with savings growing to $5.4 billion in 2028-29.

The governor is also following the federal government’s lead and cutting $85 million in benefits for Ozempic and other popular weight loss medications from all Medi-Cal coverage plans, while saving $333.3 million by eliminating long-term care benefits for some enrollees.

Newsom wants to cap overtime hours for in-home support service workers, according to his budget, to save $707.5 million next year.

The governor’s budget includes a controversial proposal to grab $1.3 billion in funding in 2025-26 from Proposition 35, a measure voters approved in November that dedicated the revenue from a tax on managed care organizations to primarily pay for increases to Medi-Cal provider rates. The decision is expected to draw pushback from a coalition of doctors, clinics, hospitals and other healthcare groups that supported the proposition, which nearly 68% of voters backed.

Under another cost-saving measure, the governor wants to shift $1.5 billion in funding for Cal Fire from the general fund. Instead, Newsom wants to provide that $1.5 billion from the greenhouse gas reduction fund paid for by proceeds of the state cap-and-trade program next year.

The governor’s budget proposes extending the cap-and-trade program — a first-of-its-kind initiative that sets limits on companies’ greenhouse gas emissions and allows them to buy additional credits at auction from the state, and he wants to dedicate at least $1 billion each year to high speed rail.

A spending deficit
The budget marks a continuation of years of overspending in California under the Newsom administration.

After predicting a lofty $100-billion surplus from federal COVID-19 stimulus funding and the resulting economic gains three years ago, Democrats have not reduced spending to match up with a return to normal after the pandemic.

Poor projections, the ballooning cost of Democratic policy promises and a reluctance to make long-term sweeping cuts have added to the deficit at a time when the governor regularly touts California’s place as the fourth largest economy in the world.

State revenues have exceeded expectations since April, but so has state spending.

Despite the shortfall, California has more money to spend than in the prior budget approved in June, and the governor and lawmakers still plan to take $7.1 billion from the state’s rainy day fund to cover the total 2025-26 deficit.

A “Trump Slump”
Though personal income tax and corporate tax receipts in the state came in $6.8 billion above projections through April, Newsom is predicting that overall revenues will be $16 billion lower than they could have been from January 2025 through June 2026 because of the economic impact of Trump’s tariffs.

The governor originally released the new information, which his team dubbed the “Trump Slump,” on the eve of the presentation of his revised 2025-26 state budget plan, seeking to blame the president for California’s expected revenue shortfall.

Trump implemented a series of tariffs on all imported goods, higher taxes on products from goods from Mexico, Canada and China, and specific levies on products and materials such as autos and aluminum, in April. The president has backed down from some of his tariffs, but Newsom alleges that the policies and economic uncertainty will lead to higher unemployment, inflation, lower GDP projections and less capital gains revenue for California.

California filed a lawsuit last month arguing that Trump lacks the authority to impose tariffs on his own. On Tuesday, the state said it will seek a preliminary injunction to freeze the tariffs in federal court.
 
The funny thing about Futurama, Nixon and the faggot Groening is that Groening make Nixon into the worst kind of character he could think of and the fans absolutely love it.

Nixon is most Futurama's fans favourite or near favourite (Zapp comes pretty high up there too) but Groening wanted some parody evil of what Liberals thought Nixon actually was but he ended up creating a awesome over the top villain everyone loved. Matt wanted to axe the character because the fans loved it but thankfully by the time the 3rd season rolled around Matt was off with Epstein fucking little girls in the ass and too busy to fuck up the show any further.

It goes to show that the Lefty's really really don't understand the average person at all.
 
If you go that far, why not just use the hospital to let people detox while comatose so they don't have to suffer through the withdrawals? The recovery would still be a bitch but at least their recovery would allow sleep at night without the kicks, cold sweats, vomiting, diarrhea and generally feeling life is actively trying to kill you.
Because medically-induced coma patients require expensive around-the-clock care. Somebody has to pay for that, and I really don’t want my tax dollars going to that. In addition, it does nothing to treat their addiction, just the effects of the withdrawal.

Edit: posted before finishing.
 
Any male 14-year-old would have enjoyed this, but that's not the point. The point is that you can be victimized while still enjoying the problematic activity. Somehow people understand this when it comes to girls but have a complete blind side when it comes to boys because of preconceived societal notions.
I too wish for some, consitantcy sex fucking shorts circuit peoples brain.

If an older teacher finds a willing 13 year old girl, and she has an orgasm from the abuse doesnt that mean she enjoyed it and it wasnt abuse.

older people should be fucking around with children they depend on you, and its a betrail of trust to do that stuff to them.
 
First off, we'd need to repeal the civil rights act. Or just the section of it that deals with freedom of association.
The main thing is the disparate impact law. You will never convince Americans that it should be okay to just not hire a black guy for no other reason than you just hate niggers. But we really do need to decide whether a fair society can result in different groups of people having different outcomes, or if this is an intolerable state of affairs, and all of law and business must be twisted and contorted to make sure there is no measurable difference whatsoever in male vs female or black vs white outcomes.
 
Back