US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Until their rights reflect that they shouldn't be held accountable then it's a moot point. They do have equal rights and so they should have equal responsibility too. This is why they should be drafted into the military too, to be consistent.


I disagree (especially in a world where abortion is allowed up until the moment of birth), there's at most equal long-term damage.


Smacking doesn't work, it only leads to resentment. If your relationship is at the point that a woman needs to be smacked then it should accompany a breakup because it's pretty much unsalvageable anyway.
They aren't practically useful in combat, though. We already have an Army organization fully optimized to consoom fodder in the event of a Great Power war, yet the idea of women being drafted is novel. Of course subjecting them to equal inconvenience based on the idea of equality is interesting, maybe they could best serve the state by having children. Lol. Giving them equal responsibility pushes society further in the wrong direction, which is fine if you want to watch its foundation buckle, but in practical lowbrow terms, we should should simply exchange their rights back for the dignity they traded in to get rights in the first place.

In terms of women crushing their baby's skull because it was inconvenient? Yeah in an ideal homogeneous nationstate where a copper-age-tier mass depopulation event wasn't beckoning on the horizon this would be prevented at literally any cost. If only the scientists in Wuhan were chuddier Covid would have just sterilized black people and then disappeared entirely.

I'm no expert, but I don't think women work like that. A shocking amount of them are wired to enjoy being choked/slapped/restrained during coitus. Human history is overflowing with events where the men were slaughtered and the women became wives, so maternal genes which promoted submission to authority were promoted. They are biologically compatible with submission, and the natural order seems to place them in a position where being smacked is essentially the worst thing they would have to deal with in day to day life anyways, rather than, say, being crushed in a collapsing coal mine or flayed by painted natives.
 
The term neocon specifically refers to GW Bush-era Republicans who believe in "spreading democracy" through military intervention
Most of the old Bushite neocons (or their fathers), the Kristols (Irving), the Podhoertzes (Norman), etc., were old Democrats of the Henry "Scoop" Jackson variety -- socially liberal, anti-communist, interventionist, learned to love tax cuts, and so forth. After the end of the Cold War, the interventionist impulses birthed the Project for the New American Century, and off the 20-aughts went, alas.
 
Please pass that bill. This and tariffs would clear the debt in no time. It would also heavily disincentivize this practice. I don't care that the Vietnamese nail tech works 80hrs a week to send money home. I have been radicalized
I'd say treat it the same as a service or wire fee paid at the time of the transfer. If people want to send money abroad, fine, but there should be a convenience fee associated with it just like many other financial transactions.

Impeachment request got denied.
I feel the impeachment move by Thanadar was little more than an effort to score points with his constituents and the party at large for doing something - even if just symbolic and pointless - to further the whole "Trump Bad!" mantra.

Perhaps Thanedar isn't all that well-liked even among his own party.
His seat was held by a black person for quite some time and many constituents and party rivals are absolutely pissed that he took that seat away from a black politician and voters. The voting base in that area is so blue a dead fish would win easily if it appeared on the ballot with a (D) beside it. It's also why Thanedar had a shoo-in victory when his Democratic primary opponents either failed to get enough signatures or ended up disqualified from the ballot. There's already opposition lining up against him for the midterms because enough people want a black person back in that seat desperately.

They would probably be doing better if they kept nailing Trump on the economy - criticize tariffs and point to negative GDP the last quarter - but there are three hurdles they've failed to clear.
There is plenty to criticize Trump about in terms of what he has or hasn't accomplished so far. Yet, they've double, triple, quadruple, and quintupled down on the name calling even though it just isn't as effective any more.

You don't get judicial immunity if you break the law while you just happen to be a judge.
In her mind, she probably feels she did the right thing keeping a wanted illegal out of the hands of ICE. As others have stated, this is ironic since this is the same group whose talking points include, "Nobody is above the law," and demands accountability when people in the legal system do wrong.

They were agreeing with RFK Jr. on some food topics and their other lib friend was sperging out because RFK Jr. is part of Trump and thus everything he supports is bad.
Even people who dislike Trump or don't think highly of RFK have agreed that RFK's take on banning those artificial coloring and his desire to get people healthier are good things without regard to partisan politics.

I'm cautiously optimistic.
As am I. The fact Iran is even willing to sit down at the table is a good first step. Time will tell if this results in any sort of deal.

***
The usual suspects are already bouncing and squeaking over the South Africans. Some are whining that Trump only cares about white immigrants and not brown ones; others are spouting the tired "Whites can never be oppressed rhetoric." I guess they don't grasp that these folks are coming over legally and have the ability to contribute to society and not live off of gibs. Its also ironic to consider these are the same people who not all that long ago were saying borders are nothing more than imaginary lines that people should be able to cross without impunity. Once again, their "It's okay only when we do it," mentality shines through.
E:Spelling.
 
Last edited:
Let's call them the Long Fifties and the Long Seventies. Shitcan the idea of the Sixties. And some of what pop culture tries to pin on the Long Seventies is actually the Long Fifties. Civil Rights in the South? That's the Long Fifties. All that happened in the 1950s, just about. It shifts North (and broadens into a socialist agenda aimed at economic equality and imposing itself into White social spaces) after achieving political victory in the South.
What would you classify the 80s, 90s, 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s as?
 
How do you think China managed to Trojan horse that shit in, you dunderhead?

I also wanted to draw attention to the China-owned and sponsored solar farms in the US.
It’s just IN the shit we buy from them. They don’t own our ports, yet port gantry cranes had the same shit.

It’s the other top casus belli for decoupling. Trump better respond to this, in light of his tariff pause, which I think was bad timing considering the India/Pakistan shit
 
The usual suspects are already bouncing and squeaking over the South Africans. Some are whining that Trump only cares about white immigrants and not brown ones; others are spouting the tired "Whites can never be oppressed rhetoric." I guess they don't grasp that these folks are coming over legally and have the ability to contribute to society and not live off of gibs. Its also ironic to consider these are the same people who not all that long ago were saying borders are nothing more than imaginary lines that people should be able to cross without impunity. Once again, their "It's okay only when we do it," mentality shines through.
Some of the Negro (ergo racist) cable news (non)contributors were making monkey noises about the Afrikaans and apartheid (even though some of the 59 weren't even born before apartheid was dismantled), coming awfully close to saying that they should have to stay in SA and suffer every evil coming for them to pay for the acts of their ancestors.
 
Won't ever happen but he does deserve it and if it did ever happen I think there would be actual mass suicides.
View attachment 7363239
He's been due for one ever since he organized the powwow between NK and SK.

Too many American politicians (and past presidents) think too hard about prestige and idealism.
Too many American politicians try too hard to appeal to their base that it actively fucks with diplomacy. People give Trump so much shit for being polite when talking about Putin or Xi or giving our "allies" shit for not pulling their weight. But Trump's approach is actually effective because he actually needs to negotiate with Russia and China and offending their leaders will just start things on the wrong foot, and our allies aren't going to stop taking advantage of us unless we put our foot down. Contrast this with how Biden did wverything to appeal to his base and the MSM, endlessly shit talked Putin and Xi, did nothing to help improve American standing in the world, gave Ukraine everything and the moon, Zelensky was so ungrateful he threw a shitfit at Trump because he cut him off and wanted a way to recoup loses.
 
They've had sanctions since 1979. Holy fucking shit. He has moved mountains

Trump wants a world at peace, not a world at War. He removed the 1979 sanctions. Regardless of his words, his actions alone prompted a response. He has earned respect.
The original 1979 sanctions on Syria were over them occupying parts (and eventually, all) of Lebanon - initially supported by the Arab League and some Lebanese themselves who thought the SAA could end the Lebanese Civil War in its early stages, but astonishingly it turned out the Syrian ultranationalist Assad Sr. was actually planning on annexing Lebanon to realize his ambitions of Greater Syria - and also propping up terrorist militias aligned with them, including Hezbollah. In the long run, the Assads and their allies were directly responsible for crippling the Lebanese Christians (another Syrian agent, a member of the pro-Greater Syria ultranationalist and Lebanese-annexationist 'Syrian Social Nationalist Party', murdered Bachir Gemayel, who was the single most brutal but also the most effective Christian leader in that war, then beat the shit out of the disorganized Christian factions for the next couple decades) and putting Hezbollah in ascendancy over Lebanon. That's one of the reasons I could never get fully onboard with the 'multipolar' crowd which had been among Assad Jr.'s biggest online cheerleaders. The other (even tougher) sanctions piled up over more recent years, especially after the civil war got going of course.

That said, there's no reason to keep those sanctions on now that the Assads are history. The new guy Trump just met with, Ahmed al-Shara'a (AKA Abu Muhammad al-Jolani), is pretty far from being trustworthy himself I'd say - his outfit originated as Al-Qaeda in Syria - but you could say much the same about just about anyone else who rules anyplace in the Middle East. AJ is also vehemently anti-Hezbollah (Hezb, which subscribes to the Shia sect of Islam, saved Assad's ass in 2013 & consistently heavily supported him against the rebels, who mostly belong to the rival Sunni sect, and AQ/HTS are obviously among the most extreme representatives of Sunnism in Syria, beaten out only by ISIS and a few smaller splinter groups), rejects the pan-Arabist/Greater Syria ideology and has actively been working with Lebanon to kick Hezbollah in the balls after Israel knocked them down. Furthermore he's a smart enough guy to not directly start an unwinnable fight with Israel from his devastated position even after the Israelis bombed him and sponsored an attempt by some of the Druze (another sect) in far southern Syria to secede, instead shutting the Druze and also Kurdish (anti-Turk commies up north, supported vs. ISIS by the US) secessionists down in his own way.

If (big if, but that's always the case with Islamist warlords) AJ contains his Islamist dictatorship within Syria's borders, doesn't fuck with Lebanon or the US, and generally proves more interested in rebuilding the ruined Syria rather than sponsoring terror attacks against his neighbors or even more distant countries - then that's already a pretty good outcome at this point tbh, if not the best one that can be expected realistically. Lifting sanctions as a big carrot to get him to move in that direction is probably a smart call, Syria was never going to become some liberal democracy with routine fag parades in Damascus no matter who won the civil war anyway so it's not like keeping the sanctions to try to force that outcome would've been a good idea.
 
Syria was never going to become some liberal democracy with routine fag parades in Damascus no matter who won the civil war anyway so it's not like keeping the sanctions to try to force that outcome would've been a good idea.
This is what enraged me about Gadaffi. Yeah he was funding terrorism here and there, but ever since he's been toppled, Libya has no central government and is no closer to freedom or democracy that the pozzed globohomo celebrates so much. Country hasn't recovered since 2011. Democracy cannot be forced on the population no matter how much you cheer it.

Edit: If Damascus cleans up its act and forms a functioning society I might have to visit some of the historical sights and stuff.
 
What would you classify the 80s, 90s, 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s as?
The best of times, the worst of times.
If (big if, but that's always the case with Islamist warlords) AJ contains his Islamist dictatorship within Syria's borders, doesn't fuck with Lebanon or the US, and generally proves more interested in rebuilding the ruined Syria rather than sponsoring terror attacks against his neighbors or even more distant countries - then that's already a pretty good outcome at this point tbh, if not the best one that can be expected realistically. Lifting sanctions as a big carrot to get him to move in that direction is probably a smart call, Syria was never going to become some liberal democracy with routine fag parades in Damascus no matter who won the civil war anyway so it's not like keeping the sanctions to try to force that outcome would've been a good idea.
Trump has made clear the US is done being the moral arbiter of the world. Syria has had a new dawn. It's their time to shine if they choose. What matters is if they can live with their neighbors. Considering that Saudi Aribia was the one to ask for the arrangement, I think they can with some.
 
The best of times, the worst of times.

Trump has made clear the US is done being the moral arbiter of the world. Syria has had a new dawn. It's their time to shine if they choose. What matters is if they can live with their neighbors. Considering that Saudi Aribia was the one to ask for the arrangement, I think they can with some.
They chose to slaughter Christians just like they did in NYC, Boston, Paris, London, Madrid and all over the world. Saudi Arabia bankrolled Al Qaeda and ISIS as stated very plainly in Hillary's emails. The vast majority of 9/11 terrorists were Saudis.
 
Back