Culture Crowdfunding campaign for woman allegedly involved in viral TikTok garners over $100K - /pol/ makes based white mother rich.

Featured on May 2, 2025 by Null: Shiloh Hendrix is doxed after calling a black child trying to steal her from her son the n-word, and the resulting GiveSendGo to relocate has become a race war to raise more money than Anthony Karmelo's $519k.

A fundraiser created by the user "Shiloh Hendrix" has raised more than $125,000 to help her family relocate after claiming the viral video led to their address, names and her Social Security number to be leaked.​

ROCHESTER — The woman who allegedly directed a racial slur toward a child in a viral TikTok video has raised more than $125,000 for herself and her two children, according to a campaign on GiveSendGo.

A crowdfunding campaign titled "Help Me Protect My Family" was created by the user "Shiloh Hendrix" on Thursday afternoon, May 1. Hendrix claims her Social Security number, home address, phone number and place she works out have all been leaked to the public. The fundraising goal is set for $150,000.

Bamber Valley Elementary Morning Run
Read More
"I am asking for your help to assist in protecting my family. I fear that we must relocate," the campaign said. "I have two small children who do not deserve this. We have been threatened to the extreme by people online. Anything will help! We cannot, and will not live in fear!"

The video depicted a man, who is not white, confronting the woman for calling a Black child a racial slur. Though the original video was taken down, Michael McWhorter, known online as TizzyEnt, reposted the video on Wednesday, April 30, to his more than 9.5 million followers across TikTok , Instagram , X and YouTube.

In her campaign, Hendrix claims the child stole from her 18-month-old son’s diaper bag at the Soldiers Field Park playground.

“I called the kid out for what he was,” Hendrix wrote.

As of Thursday night, the fundraiser has received more than 4,000 donations.

The video has since received millions of views, with McWhorter’s repost receiving 8.2 million views. Local leaders in Rochester have also responded to the video.

The Rochester Branch of the NAACP called on the Rochester Police Department and the Olmsted County Attorney’s Office to investigate the incident and file necessary charges. Rochester Mayor Kim Norton urged Rochester residents to do all they can to “end racism in this community.” DFL state lawmakers representing Rochester issued a joint statement condemning the “vile acts of racism” and said they were grateful that the person taking the video stepped in.

On the crowdfunding page, Hendrix alleges the individual who stepped in to film the video proceeded to follow her to her car and claims he has a criminal history. The Post Bulletin has not yet been able to identify the person who filmed the video. The TikTok account of the original poster has since been privated.

According to Minnesota Court Records Online, Hendrix was convicted of a misdemeanor DWI in 2014 and a petty misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct in 2012.

RPD is aware of the video and has received multiple calls related to it, RPD’s Amanda Grayson previously told the Post Bulletin. The police department is “actively looking into the matter.”

PS: so apparently /pol/ has been busy signal boosting this lady and memeing her the new queen of /pol/ and there’s rumors the dude confronting her is a pedo of some kind. @Shapes made an extensive and well done post chronicling the shenanigans here
Shapes

🐱 Post in thread 'Interesting clickbait, op-eds, fluff pieces and other smaller stories'

Sangue e terra said:
A white trash mom (Shiloh Hendrix) called a nigglet for nigger for toching her kids diaper bag. Some faggot named TizzyEnt (Michael McWhorter) (yes, he has a bluesky account) decided to repost the niggers parents video in an attempt to start a witch hunt on raysism. Also, as the American tradition goes: gofundme links are thrown around here.
Fake and gay rage bait for attention or just a shitshow? IDK.
View attachment 7304772
Click to expand...

Are you speaking of Shiloh Hendrix? The new queen of /pol/, the Burger Queen as it were. Was watching her story since early this morning. An...
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like

It’s over 150k at this point and climbing. Kinda kino ngl
Edit: 171k with spicy $1488 donations.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Miss Dindu, GR8 B8 M8 I R8 8/8, ¨¨¨ and 233 others
Click to expand...
Libertarianism is an inherently losing ideology. Your enemies want you broke, your wife raped by "migrants", your kids to troon out and the extinction of your race. Not wanting to use state sanctioned violence on these people is a mental illness.

I don't give a fuck about "muh principles" I'd gladly live in a 99.9% White communist society compared to what Jews and woke tards want.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Urmaddet, Safir, beyonce fan #1 and 19 others
Taser Confetti said:
Libertarianism is an inherently losing ideology. Your enemies want you broke, your wife raped by "migrants", your kids to troon out and the extinction of your race. Not wanting to use state sanctioned violence on these people is a mental illness.

I don't give a fuck about "muh principles" I'd gladly live in a 99.9% White communist society compared to what Jews and woke tards want.
Click to expand...
That's why National Socialism has all other ideologies beat.
ns11.webp
 
  • Like
  • Autistic
  • Disagree
Reactions: Godai Yuusaku, The Hardest R, Super Guido and 5 others
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
The state are the ones who let the Somalis in, but I'm sure they'll be trustworthy this time.
Click to expand...

Take over the state and crush your ideological and racial enemies. You're not gonna win the battle of ideologies like it's Fallout and New Vegas and after the right speech check nogs and kikes are all the sudden gonna act right. You can drop out of society and live on some off-grid homestead with your family until they come for you (they will). Or you can realize that politics is a loaded gun on a table and the person sitting across the table from you is a paranoid schizophrenic.

All the Libertarian and Agorist movements have managed to do is produce a bunch of lolcow Sovcit/1A Auditors and polycules living in New Hampshire.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Safir, John.Doe, beyonce fan #1 and 11 others
Just Want 2 Read said:
I think that a lot of Lolbert ideology is actually good and could work, but as you mention it would be contingent on that sort of society having stringent barriers to outsiders, and not just for immigration. Limits to outsider propaganda and economic access to the market would have to be implemented, as well as limited suffrage of the population. One thing, as a country mouse, that always puzzled me about the dialogue surrounding defund the police was why white right wing Americans in rural neighborhoods didn't advocate for them to do it. A white rural community could police itself, niggers would kill each other in a week.
Click to expand...
Lolbertarians did an insane amount of damage to the country. Any side that opposes using political force will by its nature be abused by the side that does, and the only fucking things it stood for was enabling destructive vices (porn, hard drugs, CP) and absolutely unfettered corporations under the absolutely naive idea that people would naturally do what's best for society as a whole.

Thing is, that idea is insanely optimistic in practice. Look at Nick Fucking Rekieta for the end goal of the Lolbertarian. A horrible drug abuser, a coomer so brainrotted that he thought the goddamned Balldo was a good idea, and the fact that his so-called 'favorite child' popped hot for cocaine paints a horrifying picture of what could have come had his church not intervened when it did.

Lolbertarians are just as destructive as the commies in the Left and they're enabled by the same global elite because of how corrosive their influence is on the health of any functional society.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: FuckedOffToff, Safir, John.Doe and 22 others
AnotherPleb said:
Lolbertarians are just as destructive as the commies in the Left and they're enabled by the same global elite because of how corrosive their influence is on the health of any functional society.
Click to expand...
You're either ignorant about how destructive communism/neo-Marxism is or you're being hyperbolic. Even if you agree that libertarianism is a losing strategy (I think it's more that libertarians themselves just tend to be naive and bad at strategy, rather than it being inherent to the ideas) it's very silly to claim it's "just as destructive as the commies." I can only assume that you're either annoyed with them personally and want to talk shit (understandable) or you're just making some point by exaggerating, cause there's no way you can really believe that.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Deviant
Reactions: BJLSh8tr, Safir, 08903248752 and 11 others
astrohairlip said:
You're either ignorant about how destructive communism/neo-Marxism is or you're being hyperbolic. Even if you agree that libertarianism is a losing strategy (I think it's more that libertarians themselves just tend to be naive and bad at strategy, rather than it being inherent to the ideas) it's very silly to claim it's "just as destructive as the commies." I can only assume that you're either annoyed with them personally and want to talk shit (understandable) or you're just making some point by exaggerating, cause there's no way you can really believe that.
Click to expand...
Jews dreamed up libertarianism and jews are an intentionally corrosive force.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: The Hardest R, jhhbhjbgtu1221, Super Guido and 11 others
astrohairlip said:
You're either ignorant about how destructive communism/neo-Marxism is or you're being hyperbolic. Even if you agree that libertarianism is a losing strategy (I think it's more that libertarians themselves just tend to be naive and bad at strategy, rather than it being inherent to the ideas) it's very silly to claim it's "just as destructive as the commies." I can only assume that you're either annoyed with them personally and want to talk shit (understandable) or you're just making some point by exaggerating, cause there's no way you can really believe that.
Click to expand...
I do. Power left alone out of assumption that your enemies will play fair is suicidal. A political party based on not wielding power can only be cruise control at best because it doesn't try to right any wrongs.

ETA: It has a hard cap of a local government and a modest one at that, but the same can be said of any political philosophy. Libertarianism does not translate at all on the larger scale because of the power vacuum it creates.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: BJLSh8tr, pikachudidnothingwrong, Glowing In The Streets and 6 others
AnotherPleb said:
I do. Power left alone out of assumption that your enemies will play fair is suicidal. A political party based on not wielding power can only be cruise control at best because it doesn't try to right any wrongs.

ETA: It has a hard cap of a local government and a modest one at that, but the same can be said of any political philosophy. Libertarianism does not translate at all on the larger scale because of the power vacuum it creates.
Click to expand...
I don't really want to derail the thread too much, and I generally don't feel like debating or arguing about things like this on the internet with relative strangers is a good use of time, but I think I understand where you're coming from, at least. I think you're making a mistake in conflating the ideas of libertarianism, which are sound, with loony idiots on the internet, and the Libertarian Party, which is comprised mostly of naive, goofy losers. The ideals of libertarianism, like the non-aggression principle and freedom of association, don't prescribe any particular course in regards to "how do people get to a place where those things are more prominent," so they don't inherently cause any kind of power vacuum.

Libertarians often do a bad job at explaining their position, and the most visible morons end up getting associated with it, which is a shame. The real "flaw" of libertarianism, if you can really call it that, is that unlike political ideologies like liberalism or conservatism, it's more useful as an observation about how societies function, or what causes them to break down. This is because there really is no way to achieve any kind of "libertarian society" in the current day, and most people's ideas about what one would even look like are starting from an impossible premise. The observations about things like Hoppe's argumentation ethics are correct, and societies that actually adhere more closely to libertarian principles tend to be more functional and prosperous as a result, but because there's no clear path to get to a "libertarian society," you end up with a lot of pointless, ineffectual bitching on the internet.

In any case, it can't be even a fraction as harmful as communism, because even if it were as plainly self-defeating and counterproductive as is claimed, it doesn't have even a fraction of the influence or capacity to wreck economies. It doesn't have the same memetic appeal, and even if it did, its "attack vector" (i.e. the mental conditions required to absorb it) are much less disruptive and prone to degeneration.

Think of all the libertarians you've met in your life, and they're mostly reclusive internet weirdos, middle class engineers, and adults who were homeschooled by somewhat kooky but relatively functional parents. Next, think of communists you may have been unfortunate enough to meet: without exception, the dregs of society; bitter, angry, violent, and prone to honing in on whatever is good and useful in order to destroy it. It's no comparison.
 
  • Agree
  • Deviant
  • Like
Reactions: Safir, The Hardest R, TooManyKittens and 3 others
AnotherPleb said:
Lolbertarians did an insane amount of damage to the country. Any side that opposes using political force will by its nature be abused by the side that does, and the only fucking things it stood for was enabling destructive vices (porn, hard drugs, CP) and absolutely unfettered corporations under the absolutely naive idea that people would naturally do what's best for society as a whole.

Thing is, that idea is insanely optimistic in practice. Look at Nick Fucking Rekieta for the end goal of the Lolbertarian. A horrible drug abuser, a coomer so brainrotted that he thought the goddamned Balldo was a good idea, and the fact that his so-called 'favorite child' popped hot for cocaine paints a horrifying picture of what could have come had his church not intervened when it did.

Lolbertarians are just as destructive as the commies in the Left and they're enabled by the same global elite because of how corrosive their influence is on the health of any functional society.
Click to expand...

As someone else in this thread mentioned, I think you're taking the retarded Lolbert party as your entire representative sample. Not to mention, I didn't condone the entire Lobert philosophy. Elements of it could work, shit like low taxes and the government mostly staying out of white people's business. Most white people don't need a government referee to get them through life. In fact most white people are currently restrained from doing the right things because of a government referee.

Nick Rekieta is a faggot and a scumbag. But just because he can't handle his liquor doesn't mean I support prohibition, or the sort of government overreach it would take to enforce it. As you stated, it was his Church that (thankfully) intervened in this matter, not really the government that got the balldo rolling. It's possible to think that generally limited government is a good thing but still think Nick Rekieta is scumbag who should have seen years behind bars.

Again leaving the retarded Loberts out of it, I don't think most classic proponents of small government want to see CSAM legalized. Repeal of drug prohibitions has almost always been a tenant sure, but that's mostly because prohibition doesn't work and instead funnels money into the hands of terrible human beings (cartels, Mafia, etc.). I don't think most proponents of a small government would tell you it's a good idea to inject black tar heroin, or that you should be excused from other crimes crimes committed while doing a hard drug.

The unfettered corporations thing is indeed a massive flaw in Lolbert/Small Government/Constitutionalist circles. I don't think the founders could have foreseen the sort of influence a company could have on a population level like the influence we see from things like Google, Health insurance companies, Amazon, etc. Many time these companies have power that is on equal level with the government, if not more so. So yeah, even today with as much government as there is, we do a terrible job of dealing with those entities. Of course all of these companies and their overreach is in part enabled by the debt slavery enforced by the Federal Reserve, but that's a different conversation.

Most classic lolberts mostly wanted a return to the Constitutional bounds of the government. I'll reiterate that idea is mostly a good and reasonable thing within the boundaries of a white society where only the best of men voted. The best implementation for a modern system would be to have a somewhat fascistic approach to outside forces, a binding together to repel them, while within that group allowing for mostly personal freedom. If you've never lived in a white rural community maybe you wouldn't understand. White people left to their own devices will mostly sort themselves out and be able to coexist. And just because retards like Rekieta can't handle his shit doesn't mean that all white people need an intrusive government nanny state.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: TooManyKittens, indomitable snowman and Qonas
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back