Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

No, that's fucking stupid. We have Section 230 protections specifically so you can't arbitrarily hold CEOs responsible for genocide just because of the retardation of niggers. Zuckerberg is a tool but he is not personally responsible for some niggers deciding to kill other niggers because the niggers were so stupid that they thought the Facebook News app was the end-all-be-all for justifying mass murder of niggers.
The very creation of Facebook is a crime that is exempt from Section 230 protections and I'm tired of pretending otherwise.
 
t. #1 Farms supporter and Josh's best friend Patrick S Tomlinson
I still can't believe that all of Patrick's detractors haven't figured out that the paid ball washer forum is what keeps the lights on around here. He only does it because he has a psychosexual desire for humiliation and negative attention.
 
In case there was ever any doubt, Patrick S. Tomlinson has officially absolved the Kiwi Farms and its "inhuman monsters" of any responsibility for the swattings. Threads / archive

View attachment 7363152
He might be a bumbling retard but I'll give him respect for at least admitting the truth on this one instead of trying to go for what he thinks is an easy target. Imagine being Keffels and having less integrity than Fatrick.
 
Supreme Court issued an opinion on how cases of police's excessive force are to be handled. I think it might be relevant to Patrick's case. In particular they rejected the "circumstances existing at the precise time" theory that MPD relied on, and instructed that every previous interaction is to be included when considering the "totality of the circumstances” with no time limit.

 
Last edited:
IMG_1757.webp
IMG_1753.webpIMG_1754.webp

IMG_1755.webpIMG_1758.webp
Rare Threads “enjoy preeesun.”
Enjoy Threads hell, stlaker boomer :tomlinson:

OH MY FUCKING GOD, MY FUCKING SIDES :story:
IMG_1761.webpIMG_1762.webpIMG_1763.webpIMG_1764.webpIMG_1765.webpIMG_1766.webpIMG_1767.webpIMG_1768.webpIMG_1769.webpIMG_1770.webpIMG_1771.webp
Slapfights with a Canuck lady for 2 fucking hours straight, and she fucking won and made Rick letting out a whimper:story:
 
Supreme Court issued an opinion on how cases of police's excessive force are to be handled. I think it might be relevant to Patrick's case. In particular they rejected the "circumstances at the moment" theory that MPD relied on, and instructed that every previous interaction is to be included when considering the "totality of the circumstances” with no time limit.

I don't believe this is a case of "excessive" force, or even necessarily force aside from that necessary to temporarily restrain a resisting suspect with a history of threats of violent behavior and highly negative interactions with police.

It's certainly not a "deadly" force case.

I also don't believe that adopting a "totality of the circumstances" approach changes much of anything, particularly under Fatboy's novel theory that the police somehow should have ignored a call or otherwise not been diligent in at least making sure there was no shenanigans at his location simply because of his assertion that he lived at a "known swaTTing" location.
 
I don't believe this is a case of "excessive" force,
While Patrick certainly hasn't pled that, both sides admit that swatting is generally dangerous. I think it's reasonable for the court to, if it's deciding the issue generally, consider how its test would apply in a situation where the victim isn't as lucky. Particularly so where both parties already spent significant time arguing (if memory serves) whether MPD's actions were "objectively reasonable", which is one of the factors that disqualify (or qualify) excessive force.
I also don't believe that adopting a "totality of the circumstances" approach changes much of anything, particularly under Fatboy's novel theory that the police somehow should have ignored a call or otherwise not been diligent in at least making sure there was no shenanigans at his location simply because of his assertion that he lived at a "known swaTTing" location.
It does, though, as "totality of the circumstances" now has no time limit, and every "circumstance" known to the police is to be considered. That is relevant particularly because MPD has spent all of its time arguing that the police didn't know shit, implying that were it otherwise they'd be fucked.

Granted, this is like two or three steps removed in applicability, but I found it still interesting
 
That is relevant particularly because MPD has spent all of its time arguing that the police didn't know shit, implying that were it otherwise they'd be fucked.
Its too bad that intelligent and attentive people don't tend to get into law enforcement. I can't imagine that it would be so hard to flag a person and/or address in the dispatch system as "something's fucky, use restraint" after the first few times. But cops and clever IT people don't have a huge overlap on a Venn diagram.
 
While Patrick certainly hasn't pled that, both sides admit that swatting is generally dangerous. I think it's reasonable for the court to, if it's deciding the issue generally, consider how its test would apply in a situation where the victim isn't as lucky. Particularly so where both parties already spent significant time arguing (if memory serves) whether MPD's actions were "objectively reasonable", which is one of the factors that disqualify (or qualify) excessive force.

It does, though, as "totality of the circumstances" now has no time limit, and every "circumstance" known to the police is to be considered. That is relevant particularly because MPD has spent all of its time arguing that the police didn't know shit, implying that were it otherwise they'd be fucked.

Granted, this is like two or three steps removed in applicability, but I found it still interesting
1747321099163.webp


First, remove any reference to traffic stops and substitute "swaTTing". Then, consider "a careful balancing" or the individual's Fourth Amendment interests and the countervailing governmental interest... At issue is Fatboy thinks the police were "unreasonable" in both responding to and diligently assessing the nature of the calls - for no other reason than that he was subject to quick, not especially intrusive searches that resulted in, at most, a minor inconvenience and that no one simply took his word that a response wasn't necessary. Now consider Fatboy's history of violent threats, public statements about using his allegedly many firearms against his perceived enemies, his general confrontational nature and anger issues, his failure to comply with the police in practically every interaction with them and his physical resistance on at least two occasions to their lawful directives.
 
Its too bad that intelligent and attentive people don't tend to get into law enforcement.
It's not even that intelligent people don't try to be cops. Police departments will routinely not accept candidates that are too intelligent, with the mindset that if a candidate isn't a mouth breathing moron, they more likely to have other options to take another job.
 
In case there was ever any doubt, Patrick S. Tomlinson has officially absolved the Kiwi Farms and its "inhuman monsters" of any responsibility for the swattings. Threads / archive
For once in his miserable life Rick has told the truth. Don't be surprised when he goes back to lying, as this is a one off occurrence.
 
Zuckerberg is a tool but he is not personally responsible for some niggers deciding to kill other niggers because the niggers were so stupid that they thought the Facebook News app was the end-all-be-all for justifying mass murder of niggers.
Yet, when I give a loaded gun to a (non stalker who isn't a prison enjoyer) child, I'm suddenly some kind irresponsible monster...
 
Back