US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's probably trump just being air headed, but I want to believe it's a very subtle power move. The very same kind the left has used constantly for the past decade to redefine terms.

"the n word is a horrible word, you know what i'm talking about right?"
99% of westerners think of nigger
"nuclear. It's a horrible word"

It really communicates so much so subtly.
"Hey faggots, bad words that hurt people's feelings are so insignificant compared to the actual threats the world faces, for example nuclear threats"

When people hear "horrifying word that begins with N" they really should think "nuclear", and this is a subtle nod in that direction or at least that's how i choose to interpret it.
I've seen Hiroshima and I've seen Detroit. Niggers are more dangerous than Nukes.
 
Perhaps the biggest problem with libertarians is that most if not all are cowards. If you have any sort of power used their first reaction is to flee.

Exactly what are you supposed to do when the bad faith criminals aren't going to extend you the same courtesy
Let me as a small L libertarian say that these quandaries answer themselves: the tyranny of state power we fear and hate in the macro is the same that will immediately be used against us in the micro when acting to the letter of our beliefs.

We live in Anarcho Tyranny. There are very few circumstances where acting within what are understood to be natural rights would avail us the certainty of freedom and to not face unjust consequences. We're not even talking about a fair trial here, within the laws of the land; you can't even call a nog a nog for acting like a nog without an inquiry, investigation and complete social death, imagine what would happen if you knifed one in the throat if your life is threatened. Even with witnesses, you're gonna go down if one element of your immutable characteristics are in misstep with what TPTB hold dear at the moment. Or if the prosecutor maintains that the dead p.o.s. recidivist nog was actually a future rocket doctor. Etc.

Call it cowardice, sure, I get it. But it's completely understandable, from a individualistic notion, which of course libertarianism is. I ain't gonna serve time in your backward ass rule system to further my beliefs in hopes of my railroading enlightens and emancipates YOU.

(I will gladly serve life to insure my child's safety. To a far lesser degree, I believe in protecting my person even in their absence in a similar threatening circumstance as i am their provider. Does meeting threat with certain and immediate violence in one circumstance and not the other make me a coward?)
 
Forgive me, but as an outsider looking in (regarding US politics) it feels that Trump has been ruling solely by EOs since he came into power, but surely laws need to be drafted and enacted by Congress to be made to stick? I just hope the GOP will make the most of their control over both houses before the midterms...

may I ask where your from?

The founding fathers were fucking roman/classica greek nerds that thought long and hard about the issues of governance. They correctly imo addressed some problems and created new one.

One of the best things they did was give congress the power to make the laws, but they could never administer them. A congressman cant not order federal workers around, cant not give orders to military etc.

The people who do the hands on administration of the law are not able to make the law. Its a great seperation of powers.

same with making the president supreme leader of the military thus no coups etc.

Up untill teddy rosevelt it was viewd that true power was with congress and the administration could only do what they directed him to do.

Congress has willingly given up its authority the bureaucracy and excutive branch because after the second iraq war some senators got fucking kicked out of office for it. (as they should)

So to avoid responisbility they kept ceding authority to the excutive branch

treaties congress is supose to do

tarrif congress is supose to do

here look at this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_Expansion_Act

war congress is suspose to do

They give the admin authorization to do limited military shit

I would ultimately blame us americans for not being civic minded and engaged in these matters
 
Not really. The fences and gates do that.

If you're referring to niggers avoiding buying homes in neighborhoods with HOAs, that doesn't really pan out much either. HOAs do their best to only target soft targets -- owners they figure will just bend the knee, obey the demands they mail out, and avoid confrontation, and absentee owners renting out their homes who they know will just bark at their tenants to avoid problems. The average white family will just adjust the lawn mower to comply with a "lol your lawn's too tall" demand or rent a machine for a "you need to pressure wash your house" order.

On the other hand, niggers will show up at the board members' homes to threaten to fuck them up and they'll bring the whole gang (er, sorry, "family") to help.

They also occasionally run into people like me who's all too happy to lawyer up to tell them to fuck off when they complain about fucking garbage cans and try to bill me for their lawyer's time. They haven't played with me very much since then. Guess they figured out I wasn't a pushover. Bolsters my argument though ... when there's plenty of subservient neighbors to hassle, I'm not worth their trouble.
Weird. I live in a neighborhood with no HOA, so all I know are the people who say they're whatever and then the people who want to murder their board members.
 
Practically any HOA-encumbered property in the country (about 30% of all housing, 75.5 million homeowners) generally has to beg permission from their faggot neighborhood overlords to paint their sheds.

HOAs should be banned and their proponents hanged in the streets.
HOAs vary tremendously depending on where you are.

Basically, the bluer the area, the more fucking insane they are, run by liberal cat ladies and their enablers.

You get to the places where the signs say "trump" and "ammo is expensive, there's no warning shot" and you get HOAs that basically blow snow and mow, and sometimes require you to be armed.

It's damn important to read the covenant BUT ALSO pay attention to the actual meetings of any HOA you might get entangled with.

The good news is people give so little shit about them it's not hard to take over the HOA board in many cases.

But in general, unless its just common maintenance or a literal country club, the dues are better spend elsewhere, or to get a better house.
 
It's essentially a fifth layer of government (federal -> state -> county -> city -> HOA), so the "more government!" crowd is always eager to support HOAs.
HOA's are the libertarians' most acceptable alternative to government because it is private, and voluntary. So you'll often find a libertarian crowd supporting HOAs as well because they don't consider it government because private entity=good.
 
Congress quarreling is something that has always happened but the Supreme Court and the modern judicial system ridiculousness is not something meant to happen by design. The almighty Marbury vs. Madison saw the Court go against the "Father of Constitution" to get the power of judicial review and nationwide injunctions are a relatively new tactic for partisan (primarily liberal activist) judges to stop the executive branch from doing something.
Without Judicial review, the Constitution has no force of law.
 
HOA's are the libertarians' most acceptable alternative to government because it is private, and voluntary. So you'll often find a libertarian crowd supporting HOAs as well because they don't consider it government because private entity=good.
HOA's are evil as shit and if this is what libertarians think is a good idea they truly are the dumb fucks of democracy. I'm sure I'm not the only person who has dealt with a HOA and wanted the person who came up with it to be tortured by having them try and open jammed jar lids super-glued with razor blades around the circumference.
 
I wish we had an hoa here. My neighborhood isn't "bad" but it could be one day, would be better today if people didn't have too many cars for the size of their house and park all over the street, if people didn't have too many houses and rent those out, if people didn't throw couches and big shit on the curb they know damn well the trash men won't pick up and leave sitting, I don't know if people are doing airbnb or renting a room but I don't like the idea of that either, if people haven't repainted in 20 something years and their house looks like shit, if their garage door is busted off track forever looking like shit. And yes, keep up with the lawn too. Imo if one wants total freedom of their land/property move to the country, there are responsibilities that come with living in a neighborhood/city/proximity of others. Cmv.
 
Yeah, but it's never ever 'keep your lawn cut' and almost always 'you have to use this Pennsylvania seed, and if you even think about taking a bush hauler to the jungle that's in the property you just bought we'll take you to court because our crotch goblins like playing there and it gives the teen a place to smoke pot and finger themselves far enough away from us so we can self-medicate but not so far off that we'll worry that the urban youth will rape them'.

I did move way out to the middle of nowhere after dealing with that shit.
 
When people hear "horrifying word that begins with N" they really should think "nuclear", and this is a subtle nod in that direction or at least that's how i choose to interpret it.
I mean yes but.. what about nuclear power? we gotta start switching to that soon and I doubt this helps
 
I wish we had an hoa here. My neighborhood isn't "bad" but it could be one day, would be better today if people didn't have too many cars for the size of their house and park all over the street, if people didn't have too many houses and rent those out, if people didn't throw couches and big shit on the curb they know damn well the trash men won't pick up and leave sitting, I don't know if people are doing airbnb or renting a room but I don't like the idea of that either, if people haven't repainted in 20 something years and their house looks like shit, if their garage door is busted off track forever looking like shit. And yes, keep up with the lawn too. Imo if one wants total freedom of their land/property move to the country, there are responsibilities that come with living in a neighborhood/city/proximity of others. Cmv.

Even in areas without an HOA the city will fine you if your lawn is unruly or you have tons of broken down shit making things look bad. At least some cities (the two Ive lived in)
 
Even in areas without an HOA the city will fine you if your lawn is unruly or you have tons of broken down shit making things look bad. At least some cities (the two Ive lived in)

They do here too but it has to be reported by someone first, be better if it never started in the first place. and the city doesn't really have rules about a lot of the other things like the 7 cars or shitty old paint. I get what you all are saying about rule-creep too but there's gotta be some better middle ground could be figured out
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Netizennameless
Back