Male Rape Discussion/Debate Thread

Look man, if you're trying to lure in gooning fujos (who know who they are), this really isn't the way to do it. Male on male rape is either drug-assisted, opportunism, or noncery, and female-on-male rape is almost exclusively noncery. Big Dick Randy is a freak outlier. There isn't much to "discuss" of it save that it's fucking gross, any mention of "weakness" or "less of a man" are simply because the culture we live in has become so stupidly feminized that an epidemic of men getting raped is even possible.
 
Most retarded thing ever. It's bad, but nowhere near as bad.

Unless you got an STD or you are forced to pay child support, you are crying about nothing.
It is as bad when a male gets raped, you are being taken advantage of sexually without your consent, not to mention that you won't get as much support from others and some people will even laugh at you, trivializing the whole thing, like mentioned in this thread.

You are pathetic.
 
Look man, if you're trying to lure in gooning fujos (who know who they are), this really isn't the way to do it. Male on male rape is either drug-assisted, opportunism, or noncery, and female-on-male rape is almost exclusively noncery. Big Dick Randy is a freak outlier. There isn't much to "discuss" of it save that it's fucking gross, any mention of "weakness" or "less of a man" are simply because the culture we live in has become so stupidly feminized that an epidemic of men getting raped is even possible.
Did he take your booty and candy?
 
You are pathetic.
I was stating the objective reality of why it's not as bad. Men and women are different, hence they play by different "mating strategies" and got different social leverages when it comes to these stuff. The objective reality is the foundation for how animals and eventually us humans perceive value of things, in this case something related to reproduction.

That's why male rape is trivialized, it simply doesn't cause as much damage as if the roles were reversed. Calling me "pathetic" doesn't change this fact. If you can't comprehend this due to some moralfagging virtue, this website isn't for you.
 
I was stating the objective reality of why it's not as bad. Men and women are different, hence they play by different "mating strategies" and got different social leverages when it comes to these stuff. The objective reality is the foundation for how animals and eventually us humans perceive value of things, in this case something related to reproduction.

That's why male rape is trivialized, it simply doesn't cause as much damage as if the roles were reversed. Calling me "pathetic" doesn't change this fact. If you can't comprehend this due to some moralfagging virtue, this website isn't for you.
I don't agree with you, but I just want to know something, would you punish the woman aggressor equally as much as a male aggressor, in which the crime committed was rape through force/extorsion/use of drugs/etc? The action being the same in both scenarios.

I don't plan in continuing this conversation much because I find the responses here sad & pathetic, but I'll say that on my end I would legally punish the perpetrator in accordance with the crime committed, regardless of their biological sex (so equally).
 
Do you mean the gap between reporting and not reported being double of that of women?
Yes, this prision study states that,
Abusive sexual conduct was more likely between inmates and between staff and inmates than nonconsensual sexual acts.
Curiously it also says this.
More specifically, unwanted and sexually suggestive touching of breasts, genitals, or buttocks is more typical inside prison than the act of rape itself. Second, in the vast majority of studies, male facilities have been found to have higher rates of sexual assault compared to female facilities.


Someone also stated in another thread with a similar topic that once the army started letting in gay shit the reporting of rape from men on men dropped dramatically, don't quote me on this because I can't recall where it was from.

The lgbt essentially took what we knew which is, a joke about men being raped, into celebrating, paying money for and joking about it. You have to be comfortable and okay with tens of millions of men being sexually disfigured and mutilated into shells then filled with hormones to become, "feminized"
 
Last edited:
Most retarded thing ever. It's bad, but nowhere near as bad.

View attachment 7373941
Unless you got an STD or you are forced to pay child support, you are crying about nothing.
Someone on 4chan said it so it must be true. Do you outsource every one of your opinions to faggots on the internet or just the stupid ones?

You can argue about evolutionary coping mechanisms all you want but having your body violated like that is pretty objectively horrific for anyone and would leave permanent mental scars on the victim. Men are just less likely to acknowledge or recognize the harm that it has done to them. Same with physical abuse.
 
Yes. A man who isn't gay or weak would simply refuse the attempt and decline to be raped. It's just that easy.
I know a man in my family who was literally drugged and raped by a (gross, not-hot) woman when he was younger. It fucked with him real bad. In that instance, he physically couldn't run or fight back.
 
Someone on 4chan said it so it must be true. Do you outsource every one of your opinions to faggots on the internet or just the stupid ones?
I simply used that screenshot since it perfectly encapsulate the foundation the discussion is about, the root of the difference between how men and women are affected by rape (a reproduction strategy in nature). There is no reason to reinvent the wheel and waste time on rewriting something that hits home the point.

You can argue about evolutionary coping mechanisms all you want but having your body violated like that is pretty objectively horrific for anyone and would leave permanent mental scars on the victim. Men are just less likely to acknowledge or recognize the harm that it has done to them. Same with physical abuse.
You are 100% right, no amount of cope will save you and process the "trauma" if you get raped as man. Nobody will care about your trauma (kek, just like if your legs get blown off in a war). It's so simple to understand, even niggers understand this (they rape a lot...). In this feminist world, there is no such thing as "male victims".


No amount of cope will change how animals work and that include humans. If you don't understand the absolute fundamental basics of something, you won't be able to continue a discussion about it. That's why I included the screenshot to begin with, since I saw reddit tier takes like this post.
 
Last edited:
Yes, this prision study states that,
I think the way you presented it seemed that you were saying that men are more likely to experience rape in their life than women.

Abusive sexual conduct was more likely between inmates and between staff and inmates than nonconsensual sexual acts.
I really don't get the difference between the two.

More specifically, unwanted and sexually suggestive touching of breasts, genitals, or buttocks is more typical inside prison than the act of rape itself. Second, in the vast majority of studies, male facilities have been found to have higher rates of sexual assault compared to female facilities.
I can easily believe that.
Excluding all sort of visits from people from the outside, if a heterosexual man in prison wants to have sex he either has it with a guard (most likely male) or with an inmate (only male) - what are the chances that these encounters would be consensual?

Women (the kind without a dick) in prisons are - compared to their male counterparts:
  1. as women, lower sex drive than men (or at least more discerning)
  2. more likely to stay in prison for less - so even for those with a high sex drive, they know they will have to wait less
  3. more likely to find a male guard to have consensual sex with (I know technically cannot be consensual, but in reality it can)
  4. much less likely to be in prison for sex related crimes or be physically violent (not saying none are like this, just compared to the whole male prison population they are)
Basically this only leaves the case of male guards assaulting a female inmate. The rest are female guards or inmate on inmate, and the latter is obviously going to be less likely in a female prison.

For the case of male guard on female inmate, that is also something that I think is more of a focus for prevention as it is, if nothing else, really bad PR for the prison. On the other hand, sexual assault / rape between male inmates is taken far less seriously as largely perceived as a self regulating dynamic. There is also the false belief in the wider population that the "bad criminals" are targeted, while (from what I have heard from people who work in studying prisons), that is not really the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PunkinMan and Brme
My bad, I failed every English class I took and take a good percent face observations as fact. I may be severely retarded but I can at least notice there's a significant amount of men being taken advantage of and it being under the category of lgbt when so many men are just groomed into believing having sex with other men should be normalized. Sometimes it feels so insane at all to try to defend this topic when many people use it against women to say both are equal when it isn't, just trying to tell people there's men that aren't gay but are forced to be put in that description due to having such encounters without consent. Oh also most of my opinions come from personal experience, not from someone else's mouth
 
Last edited:
I don't agree with you, but I just want to know something, would you punish the woman aggressor equally as much as a male aggressor, in which the crime committed was rape through force/extorsion/use of drugs/etc? The action being the same in both scenarios.

I don't plan in continuing this conversation much because I find the responses here sad & pathetic, but I'll say that on my end I would legally punish the perpetrator in accordance with the crime committed, regardless of their biological sex (so equally).
First, I want to say that I was also surprised how pathetic the responses were as well. For how many times this topic is brought up in the Women Hate Thread (or in other places when women talk about rape), I thought most would react differently.

One thing I am not sure how I feel about is whether non-penetrative rape is the same as when there was penetration (inc by object - so that can include women as perpetrators). To me it seems that if there was penetration, it is worse. It does not make the other kind good or not sexual assault (or rape, whatever you want to call it*), and I am not saying they should not result both in lengthy sentences, but from a perspective of "what would you rather choose?", I think the choice is obvious. (*some countries are very specific on what rape is, although the different definition does not result in different sentences)

It is also true that I don't think it matters in the end. If another man told me he was a victim of rape by a woman, I would not dismiss it with "well, at least it wasn't by a man".
 
With how much easier men orgasm, shouldn’t most male victims be coming?
I assume they do in female on male. This would probably be why the concept of, "stealing seed," is something that's out there, though that also encompasses things like poking a hole in a condom and such.
Male on male rape would likey include anal penetration which is far less likely to cause an orgasm in response. Most rape isn't done with the express intent of causing the victim pleasure so I doubt the rapist is going to find the perfect angle to hammer your prostate and that's completely forgetting the fact that your anus isn't intended to have things go into it so you're likely to be in a large amount of pain through the entire process (a vagina would at least lubricate itself in response, not that it's not still a painful experience).

All that to say, it's probably not impossible but the circumstances are different between a female and a male victim.
 
Kek! I realized that the thread also included male on male rape. Yeah, that one is as bad as male on female rape on the trauma scale. My OG posts was only focused on women on male "rape". No wonder people were seething, especially after the Dave Chappelle clip mocking it
:popcorn:

oops, my bad.Dyslexia isn't easy.
 
First, I want to say that I was also surprised how pathetic the responses were as well. For how many times this topic is brought up in the Women Hate Thread (or in other places when women talk about rape), I thought most would react differently.

One thing I am not sure how I feel about is whether non-penetrative rape is the same as when there was penetration (inc by object - so that can include women as perpetrators). To me it seems that if there was penetration, it is worse. It does not make the other kind good or not sexual assault (or rape, whatever you want to call it*), and I am not saying they should not result both in lengthy sentences, but from a perspective of "what would you rather choose?", I think the choice is obvious. (*some countries are very specific on what rape is, although the different definition does not result in different sentences)

It is also true that I don't think it matters in the end. If another man told me he was a victim of rape by a woman, I would not dismiss it with "well, at least it wasn't by a man".
One of the problems is that you have retards like some users above that think that it's funny, or that you're "crying over nothing" if perpetrated by a woman.

These fuckers are disgusting, imagine them having a son (of age) that suffered from this, and then being told this, absolute scum.
 
that you're "crying over nothing"
Rape victims of any gender have nothing to cry about. I know you don't get any pussy but being found so attractive that someone can't control themselves and has to fuck you despite your consent is a really big compliment, bonus points if they make you cum.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Hitchhiker
Back