Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.1%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 69 10.3%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    671
Meanwhile he has committed per se defamation against the real nanny:
He thought it was someone else stealing his booze? Like who? Lying faggot. Hopefully the nanny takes him to court. He's also just admitted to further child neglect either way.
The nanny was hammering your hard liquor but you never noticed Nick? Are you that dense or away so often the Nanny had time to sober up?

Classic child abuser Nick, everyone else's fault, false or misreported, but yours.
 
Meanwhile he has committed per se defamation against the real nanny:
He thought it was someone else stealing his booze? Like who? Lying faggot. Hopefully the nanny takes him to court. He's also just admitted to further child neglect either way.
So he's saying his kid withheld this information from CPS and he is only going to file a police report now? I wonder what else she left out.

Can't imagine an investigation where she wouldn't be asked if someone offered/gave her alcohol/drugs and whether or not she used them, considering her sister tested positive for cocaine after being pulled from a coke den. I'd imagine there would also be questions about whether or not the kids were around intoxicated adults, so it sure is weird this lush (non-familial) wouldn't of been mentioned.
 
I'm trying to make sense of everything going on. There's actually a lot...

- Possible bodycam release
- Nick up all night with an unexpected guest
- Nick throwing the nanny under the bus
- The emails received by Zumock and Aaron (Aaron addressed it briefly tonight; sounds like they're legit)
- All the crazy Hackamania shit

Well, Nick, you never disappoint in the arena of lolcows.

I'm with @Captain Manning, Nick's demeanor is oddly resigned. He's as petulant and disorganized as ever, but he's not angry or resentful or particularly vengeful. It's a shift.

I don't have any deep insights except this: I think the kids are still with Bob & Celeste. That freed them up for the guest last night. It occurred to me that the guest could be Bob, not April. He might be trying to wrangle Nick into some sense after Hackamania.

I'd like to believe that the dam is about to break somehow. Seems possible.
 
After a year of copesplaining to anyone who would listen, this is his new go-to.
Archive/Link
2025-05-20T08:55:39,258569982+02:00.webp

"Why do you caaare? It's so weiiird!"
Archive/Link
2025-05-20T08:59:43,262725184+02:00.webp
 
Not to both criteria. The only people who should have had access to the unredacted report (prior to the leak) should have been the police, Nick and his co-defendants, and their lawyers, who at the time, was Nick.

Nick's an asshole and wanted his accusers harassed by the Still_life's in his fandom.
I don't see how you conclude that. I'm not saying Nick definitely wasn't the person, I'm just saying you don't know that Nick was the only one of the people with access who knew who Melton is. That is a guess.

Here's the timeline of the first leak from Melton the day after Rekieta's arrest:
  • The first Twitter post from Melton containing an excerpt of the documents seems to have been posted May 24, 2024 at 7:53 PM UTC or 2:53 PM Minnesota time, hours after Nick's first appearance while in jail.
  • The order to release Rekieta from jail was only signed almost exactly an hour earlier prior to this post at 1:52 PM Minnesota time.
  • According to a post at 3:19 PM Minnesota time, 26 minutes after Melton's first tweet containing leaked documents, Rekieta was still listed as being on the in-custody roster at that time, but it's possible the roster was out of date.
  • Nick was released by 3:49 PM Minnesota time at the latest, as the roster update showed him as being released as of this time.
The document appears to be a photograph of a page from one of the police reports and is easily verified as not being from the warrant which Rekieta was provided and infamously threw on the ground. I have no idea whether Nick would been provided a physical copy of the police reports while he was in jail within a day of the incident, even if he was self-representing. I suppose it's possible.

For Nick to be the leaker, all of the following would need to happen within 1 hour: a) the order to release Nick being signed, b) Nick being processed and released in accordance with the order, c) Nick almost immediately after being released taking his phone and taking a photo of the document to send to Melton, and d) Melton taking the picture sent to him to post to Twitter.

I think the important thing to note which was missed by not looking at the timeline closely is that this would also imply that Rekieta was in contact with Melton before even getting arrested, because otherwise why would communicating with Patrick Melton be literally the first thing he thinks of doing after getting access to his phone?

From what I understand of Rekieta's motives before the arrest, his main goal seems to have been to convince Aaron to sign an NDA preventing him from talking about the polycule so as to cover up its existence, which begs the question of why he would be in contact with Aaron's main detractor who would have had a massive financial interest in exposing the polycule.

If you really believe Nick is the leaker, I'd go through Melton's shows from before Nick's arrest because there's probably things he's saying that he's being fed by Nick.

I just know, from years of observation, that his usual M.O. is to call the person acting in opposition to him a "dummy" and to declare that they're not gonna win. By his very nature, he is an arrogant jackass.

Oftentimes this is followed by him having to eat shit.

Even people that have only followed him for just the last two years should have picked up on that by now.

He's not doing it this time, and it's REALLY obvious to me.

Hell, maybe he's finally starting to realize he's not as smart as he thinks he is. Wouldn't that be a trip?
Maybe he has learned that the "Rekieta Curse" is a thing and that by not predicting that the footage will never be released, he won't activate the curse in which his legal takes are almost always wrong.
 
So he's saying his kid withheld this information from CPS and he is only going to file a police report now? I wonder what else she left out.

Can't imagine an investigation where she wouldn't be asked if someone offered/gave her alcohol/drugs and whether or not she used them, considering her sister tested positive for cocaine after being pulled from a coke den. I'd imagine there would also be questions about whether or not the kids were around intoxicated adults, so it sure is weird this lush (non-familial) wouldn't of been mentioned.
He isn't going to report Jack shit, because it didn't happen. As brain damaged as Nick is at this point he understands full well that the biggest issue is the child neglect stuff and just who those people were who reported him.

The cops will do fuck all even if he tries. A year after the nanny left, whom also happened to have been a witness to trigger that mandatory reporter, Nick suddenly discovers the nanny was a thief and child abuser all along. Nobody is going to buy that.

I think Nick walks a dangerous path. So far those offline types have kept their mouths shut publicly. There will be a line there. Not only does he risk defamation, but he risks further stories of his balldoing ways coming out.
 
For anyone who ever wants an answer to "Why do you care?" or "So what?" It's because we're locked in this house/city/county/state/country/planet together. There doesn't need to be complete life sacrifice for one another; but there should be some level of care to ensure others don't suffer needlessly. Fucked up parents create fucked up kids; you don't have to like it, I don't fucking like it, but it should be an understood truth. Sure it's not a 100% guarantee the kids are gonna be fucked up; but when you're counting everything up, the deck stacks one way.

So about Nick's family, and the "so what? It's not your family."

Because I'm unironically on the side of Chairman Mao and what to do with drug addicts; and since we're not at the place where we just execute addicts, I might think that life does have value, as much as it pisses me off at times. Because I don't want mine or anyone else's tax dollars going to trying to fix your family that you and your retarded whore wife neglected; because I don't believe that free money is the way to solve most things, but that's how the government tries to solve shit, and you being a worthless addict puts the government in the position to do just that. Because while different groups and religions have an idea that true innocence starts at certain ages; I'd still prefer your children to not have a fucked up life, because they'll then most likely grow up into fucked up adults and perpetuate the cycle. Also because, while it may not be as strong as some think, the parents of children's friends do have some influence over the children, and I don't need you or your idiot fucking whore of a wife fucking up anymore lives in pursuit of your retarded hedonism. Sure I don't fucking care enough to do anything about it; because I'm not that close or anything, but I recognize that people have an influence on their surroundings, and as gay as it is and as much as I hate hearing hippies say shit like this; what you put out in the world effects others. I care, because I recognize you as one of the most retarded fucking reprobates alive, unable and unwilling to recognize that you may be influencing your child in some way; and I'd only hope they all grow up and decide to fucking hate you for throwing away a decent life and forcing this shit on them.

I'm not mad, I just hate the "why do you care" shit as a cop out that most people can't get past. And I get that this is a little much for what is essentially an "online relationship" and I'm with Jim when he says that online friends are gay / don't exist; you actually need to exist in someone's real life to exert influence over them. But I'd like to think my point stands; their house influences the neighborhood, which influences the city, and so on and so forth. Until half of Spicer Minnesota wants to become the next San Francisco and the people think walking through used needles and human shit on the streets is normal and anyone who thinks otherwise is a Scandinavian Incel Prude. We don't have to fucking like each other, but in one way or another, we're all in this together. That's why you should fucking care. Retarded fucking white breaded AIDS infested broke dick Somalisota nigger fag.
 
This is something I keep seeing people post in the forums, and I just have to say it: this is not TikTok, Twitch, or YouTube. You can say "pedophile" instead of "PDF file", you can say "kill yourself" instead of "self delete", and "murder" instead of "unalive."

This site allows the worst slurs with basically no limit of words you can say outside of fedposting, for fuck's sake.
I'm aware, I'm just entertained by that. Probably something about how long I've been around PDF documents and never once connected the terms phonetically, so it's unexpected or some nonsense.
He isn't going to report Jack shit, because it didn't happen. As brain damaged as Nick is at this point he understands full well that the biggest issue is the child neglect stuff and just who those people were who reported him.

The cops will do fuck all even if he tries. A year after the nanny left, whom also happened to have been a witness to trigger that mandatory reporter, Nick suddenly discovers the nanny was a thief and child abuser all along. Nobody is going to buy that.

I think Nick walks a dangerous path. So far those offline types have kept their mouths shut publicly. There will be a line there. Not only does he risk defamation, but he risks further stories of his balldoing ways coming out.
I think it would also be very blatantly be retaliatory. The nanny presumably has an ok to good reputation in the community and church. Nick's is worse than an unwanted pile of roadkill on your doorstep. It's best if he laid low until the stench blows over but god help him if he does an actual day of work, and his narc tendencies cannot help but sperg on social media. So back to streaming it is.
 
After a year of copesplaining to anyone who would listen, this is his new go-to.
Archive/Link
2025-05-20T08:55:39,258569982+02:00.webp
"Why do you caaare? It's so weiiird!"
You know where he's getting this from, right?

If you don't, I'll remind you.

When Null started the Rekieta meme thread, the very first submission in there was this:

Dick and Vito ask How This Affects You with Starving Children.webp

IN CASE OF EMERGENCY: Say Juju things.

Maybe he has learned that the "Rekieta Curse" is a thing and that by not predicting that the footage will never be released, he won't activate the curse in which his legal takes are almost always wrong.
Oooooh. I didn't think of that!

Though I dunno. If he's saying maybe like he's doing here, how does that affect his chances? Does it become a 50/50 thing?

Surely if he said, "yeah, they're definitely gonna get the bodycam," we'd be totally fucked here.
 
Wait, so you are telling me that Nick (who regularly got drunk/high to point of not remebering what he does as admitet on one of crashalot streams,) noitices bottle missing and his first reaction is "damn it must have been the nanny" even tho he regularly were drinking till early morning hours where he wouldnt be able to speak cohearently? Im pretty sure he just drank it and its coping, hoping, that Nanny wont have the money to sue him, its the Ethan ralphs "Ill call Johm Porter a pedo becasue im gonna do everything on my own ot cut the costs even if i loose, while Nick have trustfund.
Another thing that stikes me as nick not knowing value of work and money since mommy and daddy pays all bills is "she paid 75dollars to each of them to drink monsters" 150buck to what? have overhyped kids and hope for sugar crashout? have he been paying her in tens of thousands of dollars? otherwise i will never belive that nanny would spend 150dollars on something so retarded, tho i wouldnt be surprised, if his daughter and her friend did drank monsters, after witnesing skelly drinking them.
 
Oooooh. I didn't think of that!

Though I dunno. If he's saying maybe like he's doing here, how does that affect his chances? Does it become a 50/50 thing?
My theory is Rekieta has no clue what is going on with the bodycam, and is so unsure of what is happening he is lost, reverting to his real, childish, nature full of insecurity and yellow streak fear. He has no plan for this situation, no lie big enough to tell. And he doesn't know how the bodycam has been surfaced. He is waiting for the notice from the authorities that it is being released and he said that he hasn't got that yet, and that was the closest he came to an outright cope. But he also knows that the notice will come and the bodycam footage will be released. And it is not looking good for Rekieta and his disgusting wife.
I feel this is the real reason for the pics sent to the creepy women, to try and somehow smokescreen the bodycam footage by saying it's just more "embarrassing" pics like his sexting pics.
It isn't though, is it? It's going to go out on all the normal muckraking sites, minor news sites, local legacy media and of course Aaron, Null, Meme Copium and the rest. I would expect SEAN! will cover it as well.
Rekieta has no plan at all to deal with that. I also feel he is terrified that the release of this footage is some sort of bridge too far for Lady Gollum, or someone else who he has previously told that the footage will never come out. If he breaks that promise or whatever he may suffer consequences previously promised but delayed.
It's an existential crisis for the lying faggot.
 
otherwise i will never belive that nanny would spend 150dollars on something so retarded, tho i wouldnt be surprised, if his daughter and her friend did drank monsters, after witnesing skelly drinking them.
No child carer in their right mind would give a child an energy drink; you're metaphorically gassing them up with jet fuel. Sure, God willing you'll get a sugar crash; but it's everything that happens between then and now that will be painful. It's double-plus retarded to think a child carer would even pay money, $150 at that, to create their own headache. I wouldn't be surprised if Nick tried to have some house rule or something about "No X-thing after Y-hour;" but the girls were having a sleep over and begged and pleased, and the nanny did a "Don't tell your dad." To me that's the most logical; if there's any truth to the nanny giving energy drinks to two adolescents. I also wouldn't be surprised if this is Nick getting as close as he can to the nanny being bad, without saying she legitimately broke the law; though he already did that by saying they also gave the kid alcohol. He's trying to shift focus off himself; because anyone with two brain cells to rub together should be saying "Your nanny wouldn't be abusing your children if you or your wife were more attentive."
 
you're metaphorically gassing them up with jet fuel. Sure, God willing you'll get a sugar crash;
Hoping for a sugar crash is like hoping for the kids to have a hangover. Them passing out from sugar crack doesn’t result in a cherubic, well rested and agreeable child in the immediate future.

If Racket’s nanny was so retarded she’d pay her wards to stay awake on sugar and caffeine, so undisciplined she stole whole bottles of liquor from her job, and so craven and selfish as to leave those 5 kids in an abusive home? Well then rekieta would be right, she’d be a deplorable person to entrust with your flesh and blood.

As usual he doesn’t see he entrusted his children to this person. Like he let his enemy Aaron defile his children’s mother. It’s always everyone else’s fault.
 
After a year of copesplaining to anyone who would listen, this is his new go-to.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7386670

"Why do you caaare? It's so weiiird!"
Archive/Link
View attachment 7386680
Nick is such a clear-cut case of narcissism that psychology students should be lining up to interview him for their PhDs. Most narcs I've known have been able to approximately understand why people project care onto others, even if they don't experience the sensation themselves, but not so for him. The concept bewilders him, and he even feels a need to correct people of what is originally his own error, so deep does his solipsism run.

Not that I ever expect him to intellectually interrogate his own beliefs, but I'd love to know how he thinks society functions given our apparent folly for caring about one another. Does he imagine that families float in their own void-spaces, never interacting with each other, their actions never bringing consequences to the world beyond? He's so mentally stunted and isolated that he's lost all sense of cause and effect, so I'll give him this knowledge for free: families care about each other because they want society to succeed. That isn't funny or weird, it's the basic social unit.
 
Last edited:
Who could've drank the booze in a house with 5 kids, while the parents are away for the weekend? After 4 or 5 years watching the father of the house get black out drunk every night after drinking 5 in the morning? It must be the nanny. Nobody else could've even fathomed that drinking alcohol is a fun pastime.
 
that. I also feel he is terrified that the release of this footage is some sort of bridge too far for Lady Gollum, or someone else who he has previously told that the footage will never come out. If he breaks that promise or whatever he may suffer consequences previously promised but delayed

Right. It’s probably the family trust. “If the Rekieta name appears on Fox 30 in a negative light one more time, you’re fucking done, buster”. That day now approaches like the lights of an oncoming train.

Who could've drank the booze in a house with 5 kids, while the parents are away for the weekend? After 4 or 5 years watching the father of the house get black out drunk every night after drinking 5 in the morning? It must be the nanny. Nobody else could've even fathomed that drinking alcohol is a fun pastime.

It’s a fair bet that Nick plied her with drink at some point too, perhaps to get her to join in with the hot tub party and see where it goes. So he’s harboured a resentment ever since she rejected that, never mind eventually quitting the whole scene.

He tried, but the balloon was heavier than air
The balloon was filled with nitrous oxide.
 
Last edited:
Back