Business Klarna’s losses widen after more consumers fail to repay loans - Who could have guessed that people who buy things they can't afford aren't likely to repay their loans on time?

‘Buy now, pay later’ group’s weaker results come as concerns rise about the financial health of US consumers​

1747710800617.webp
Klarna said its customer credit losses had risen 17% to $136mn © Bloomberg

Akila Quinio in London
Published 15 hours ago

Klarna’s net loss more than doubled in the first quarter as more consumers failed to repay loans from the Swedish “buy now, pay later” lender as concerns rose about the financial health of US consumers.

The fintech, which offers interest-free consumer loans to allow customers to make retail purchases, on Monday reported a net loss of $99mn for the three months to March, up from $47mn a year earlier.

The company, which makes money by charging fees to merchants and to consumers who fail to repay on time, said its customer credit losses had risen to $136mn, a 17 per cent year-on-year increase.

The increased failure to repay comes on the back of gloomy economic sentiment in the US, where a closely watched measure of consumers’ confidence last week fell to its second-lowest level on record. US President Donald Trump’s trade war has driven expectations of higher inflation.

Klarna’s results come weeks after the Swedish group was forced to pause its plan for a long-awaited stock market listing in New York as Trump’s sweeping tariffs announcements upended markets.

Klarna has focused on growing aggressively in the US in recent years, signing partnerships with merchants including DoorDash, Walmart and eBay. The push into America has raised concerns about the group’s vulnerability to a US recession.

Klarna said it was “closely monitoring changes in the macroeconomic environment” and “remains well-positioned to adapt swiftly if required”.

It said the short duration of its loans — 83 per cent of its loan book refreshes within three months — allowed it “to respond rapidly to evolving market conditions”.

Klarna’s credit loss rate as a percentage of its total payment volumes remains relatively low at 0.54 per cent, up from 0.51 per cent a year ago.

Revenues in the first quarter rose 13 per cent year-on-year to $701mn as the company counted 99mn active customers.

Klarna, which presented Monday’s earnings via an AI-generated avatar of its chief executive, has bet heavily on artificial intelligence and has said the technology helps to cut costs.

The group reduced its total headcount by 39 per cent in the past two years, while its customer service costs were down 12 per cent in the first quarter compared with the same period a year earlier.

The company is also battling an increase in funding costs, which have risen 15 per cent year-on-year to $130mn.

Source (Archive)
 
Remember, where do companies like Klarna get the money to loan these people? From the banks. The difference between the fees they are paid and the interest they pay the banks is their profit.
 
I feel like we did a pretty good job at predicting this outcome when the first story about Klarna hit the board.
The most funny thing is after they go insolvent and kill themselves, no one is going to want to buy the debt either. They are so fucked.

“You gave money to assholes without any sort of assets. And for… McDonalds?!?”

Legit the most retarded nigger brain business idea on earth.
 
So what I'm hearing is now the time to take out a massive Klarna loan and be absolved when the company folds?

That right there is niggerthink.

Debt doesn't just magically disappear with the insolvency of a lending organization.

The debt will get sold off for pennies on the dollar, and the debtor will have their credit ruined, and they will be hounded by the lowest level of collection agency bottom feeders for the rest of their lives.
 
So what I'm hearing is now the time to take out a massive Klarna loan and be absolved when the company folds?
No, what happens is the debt will be sold. The actual business model is probably this:

Retarded nigger cattle takes out loans for frivolous shit they can't pay back >
nigger cattle doesn't pay (We are here) >
Klarna sells debts of nigger cattle to collector companies >
collectors hassle and fuck with nigger cattle and take whatever they can from them, even if it's not shit they bought with the loan
 
No, what happens is the debt will be sold. The actual business model is probably this:

Retarded nigger cattle takes out loans for frivolous shit they can't pay back >
nigger cattle doesn't pay (We are here) >
Klarna sells debts of nigger cattle to collector companies >
collectors hassle and fuck with nigger cattle and take whatever they can from them, even if it's not shit they bought with the loan
What you’re saying is that I should short klarna
 
It’s interest free payments if you make the 4 or so payments on time (spoiler they won’t) otherwise it’s some retarded interest rate
So if I understand this correctly, their business model is contingent on targeting people who don't repay their debts and saddling them with extra debt, because 17% of nothing is more than 0% of nothing.

The founding members of the board:
1747756257776.webp

That right there is niggerthink.

Debt doesn't just magically disappear with the insolvency of a lending organization.

The debt will get sold off for pennies on the dollar, and the debtor will have their credit ruined, and they will be hounded by the lowest level of collection agency bottom feeders for the rest of their lives.
Depends who you are, the size of the debt and the sort of life you live. I had a colleague who owed several thousand pounds and didn't care - he said "if it's less than £10k it's not worth their time to chase you." He'd just started using a different name and moved.

Thing is a lot of these debts are going to be in the hundreds of dollars. Going after those sorts of sums is going to lose you money more than you get back. I wouldn't buy that debt.
 
Last edited:
So if I understand this correctly, their business model is contingent on targeting people who don't repay their debts and saddling them with extra debt, because 17% of nothing is more than 0% of nothing.

The founding members of the board:

Like all of silicon valley’s best companies the idea is to get billions of dollarydoos of revenue on the books and then flog the lot to the nearest VC retard on the promise of future profits.
 
What's the maximum amount of money they'll give somone. I'm ready to do my part :semperfidelis:
 
Back