Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Late because this train has no brakes but either Russell made the shocking discovery that Mr Hardin is collaborating with the defendant, or he still thinks he's somehow suing Kiwi Farms, a website, as in all the people who post here.
View attachment 7385659
pretty sure russ is talkin about those 2 kiwi johns who havent logged on in years.
 
pretty sure russ is talkin about those 2 kiwi johns who havent logged on in years.
I think he's upset that we're making fun of his Winnemucca Adventure and he's claiming the only reason Mr Hardin is investigating it is to generate content for his threads (because his business dealings are obviously not relevant to contributory copyright infringement. The idea that he shouldn't be able to get away with lying to the court never occurred to him).
 
Close. It's inspired by Cato's frequent call for the destruction of Carthage.

Instead of being destroyed, Russell must be ridiculed.

Motion to NO U

View attachment 7386003
Aw yeah there's that pure unadulterated big-N Narcissism we all know and love. "I said I've changed, now everyone has to unilaterally accept that and never bring up my bad behavior (from 5 minutes ago) again."
Greer irridetur est.
 
I think he's upset that we're making fun of his Winnemucca Adventure and he's claiming the only reason Mr Hardin is investigating it is to generate content for his threads (because his business dealings are obviously not relevant to contributory copyright infringement.
The idea that Josh is happy paying thousands of dollars for Hardin to generate thread content is hilariously retarded. It's narcissism on an epic level.

Step 1: Get kicked off every payment processor in the world.
Step 2: Pay thousands of dollars for screenshots to post in a thread that can't be monetized.
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit!

It's not a surefire winner like planning a brothel in a place it's illegal to build them, but it's something.
 
Last edited:
Attend your federal court case to shut down the evil Kiwi Farms
View attachment 7387184
OR

Attend a city council meeting to get approval to open a whore house that's completely illegal under state law
View attachment 7387186
Men who play by the rules rarely change the world.
The idea that Josh is happy paying thousands of dollars for Hardin to generate thread content is hilariously retarded. It's narcissism on an epic level.

Step 1: Get kicked off every payment processor in the world.
Step 2: Pay thousands of dollars for screenshots to post in a thread that can't be monetized.
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit!

It's not a surefire winner like planning a brothel in a place it's illegal to build them, but it's something.
Hardin is our darling and all.
I wonder how Skordas is these days. We used to howl at the moon about him too, once upon a time.
 
Men who play by the rules rarely change the world.

Hardin is our darling and all.
I wonder how Skordas is these days. We used to howl at the moon about him too, once upon a time.
Skordas barely had to do anything when he represented his clients against Russell because there were competent judges overseeing the cases.

Hardin is on another level entirely.
 
It's worse than that. The meeting was on Zoom. He didn't have to drive anywhere at all.
It just reinforces a few things we know about him:
He feels that if people see him in person, his crippling disability, how hard this man struggles day in, day out that they'll just give him a pass
He feels that if people hear him in person, his natural inborn skill at oration and diction, they will be moved by how he strives to live his best life despite being the Carrier of the Book of Plights
He feels that if people witness him showing up in his beautifully maintained and obviously well chosen suit, they will know he is taking this seriously and they will grant him his wish.

But out here in reality we just see a Gollum that is less effective at communication, less able to make social connections, and trades fixation with the ring with fixation on brothels.

Lol at driving 8 hours each way to get his asshole ripped open by the magistrate over the phone while in a town hall where they could barely contain their scorn of him and go home empty handed.
 
ECF 296, 297, 298, 299
The court basically made a deal with Russel over this issue but because he is retarded he can't realize what was happening and the obligations he has. The court promised that it would be confidential and gave him enough time and has given him even further time.
Yeah, he just literally continues to lie to the court. No one stole $4000 dollars from him, that's a flat out lie. He gave the hooker $4000 and wasted his time with her at the Olive Garden rather than getting him his penis sucked. Being played by a hooker for being a retard is not stealing, it's Russ trying to have a "Girlfriend Experience" with a hooker and her outsmarting him.
To be fair if he hired that hooker legally and had something resembling a verbal contract/agreement he might be able to sue for something like violation of contract. Probably the hooker knew this explicitly or implicitly and so she knew she could get away with it.

It is funny to laugh at him for this happening to him but I don't think he is entirely incorrect when he said she stole from him.

It reminds me of the Murder Incorporated situation in that it is this weird case where something that is usually very law of the jungle has complex rules and regulation involved.
 
To be fair if he hired that hooker legally and had something resembling a verbal contract/agreement he might be able to sue for something like violation of contract.

I'm pretty sure he attempted to sue the hooker. He ended up with a restraining order against him.

(Though this might be a completely different hooker altogether?)
 
To be fair if he hired that hooker legally and had something resembling a verbal contract/agreement he might be able to sue for something like violation of contract. Probably the hooker knew this explicitly or implicitly and so she knew she could get away with it.

It is funny to laugh at him for this happening to him but I don't think he is entirely incorrect when he said she stole from him.
I doubt it. He paid her for her time and then he used that time romancing her at Olive Garden instead of fucking her.
 
I doubt it. He paid her for her time and then he used that time romancing her at Olive Garden instead of fucking her.
Imagine getting so wrapped up in your roleplay that someone can stomach you that you lose track of the time and end up not having sex and the contract was 100% fulfilled per your wishes and then declare that it was a scam because you're a retard
 
The court basically made a deal with Russel over this issue but because he is retarded he can't realize what was happening and the obligations he has. The court promised that it would be confidential and gave him enough time and has given him even further time.

To be fair if he hired that hooker legally and had something resembling a verbal contract/agreement he might be able to sue for something like violation of contract. Probably the hooker knew this explicitly or implicitly and so she knew she could get away with it.

It is funny to laugh at him for this happening to him but I don't think he is entirely incorrect when he said she stole from him.

It reminds me of the Murder Incorporated situation in that it is this weird case where something that is usually very law of the jungle has complex rules and regulation involved.
He did sue the Olive Garden Hooker. The Judge ruled against him. He was paying for her time. How he chose to use it was his problem.

How fucked up is it when you sue a hooker for not fucking you, and the Judge rules against you?
 
Back