Do Men Even Like Women?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
While I'm a resident user of the woman-hate thread, it's not all women I hate. Just particular behaviors. It isn't even hard to be decent either, just:
  • no feminism or anything like that
  • don't sleep around or do only fans
  • no tats, piercings, or unnatural color hair dye
That's it. That's literally all it takes for most men to start off with a positive disposition to you. Anything else is just normal preferences. Heck, some men won't even make the third bullet point a problem either. The bar is so low, but somehow this is too hard.
 
We do.
That's why men built society, because they wanted their women to be able to live and raise the children in peace and prosperity.
If men truly hated women, the world would adopt some form of Sharia Law because that's very beneficial to men at the cost of women.
If all men started punching women in the face, what could women do?
Nothing, but we don't because we like women, sometimes more than ourselves, often to our own detriment.
This man gets it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gemerson
Feminism's entire ideology carried by mens instincts to defer to women, nearly every man has done something for a woman on the mere fact that they're a woman, you're considered mentally strong as a man if you're able to resist women. I don't know @Stan what do you think?
 
Feminism's entire ideology carried by mens instincts to defer to women, nearly every man has done something for a woman on the mere fact that they're a woman, you're considered mentally strong as a man if you're able to resist women. I don't know @Stan what do you think?
I think that first sentence is missing a verb. Anyway.

"You chicks are lucky that men let you have feminism, because we could treat you like slaves if we weren't so polite and deferential" is some British-Empire-upon-losing-India level of cope. What's the alternative, moids chimp out and violently put down feminism and make women subordinate again?
 
I mean, that's what happened in Afghanistan when the Taliban took back control. And there doesn't seem to have been much active resistance against it.
Thanks for reminding me you're stupid and don't know about the British Raj or how to comprehend metaphors.

TL;DR Indians had been agitating for Home Rule for about ~100 years, Gandhi came along and did a bunch of famous protests involving civil disobedience, England responded with military force, which undermined their moral standing to rule India, then India agitated even more, and finally England recognized that the only way they were going to hold on to India was by total war, so they gave up and "let India go". Because hanging on to it would have been ruinous for the Empire in numerous ways - financially/militarily, not to mention morally.

So I think men huffily saying things like "well we LET you ladies have feminism because we're soooo nice!" Is kind of like the British Empire coping "oh yeah we LET India go... we definitely didn't get kicked out." Like, what's your alternative, moid? Fucking Taliban style wahabism? You think that's gonna happen in your town? OK.
 
I think that first sentence is missing a verb. Anyway.

"You chicks are lucky that men let you have feminism, because we could treat you like slaves if we weren't so polite and deferential" is some British-Empire-upon-losing-India level of cope. What's the alternative, moids chimp out and violently put down feminism and make women subordinate again?
Are you going to actually argue or just make some retarded version of what I just previously said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neodanthril
Some guy at my work said to me he had a hard time looking at his girlfriend when she is naked and he only wants to do woohoo’s when the light is turned off.
Sounds like childhood trauma to me. That or he's on some kind of pill that affects his brain chemistry. SSRIs will really screw up your sexual drive.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Among Us Gaming
TL;DR Indians had been agitating for Home Rule for about ~100 years, Gandhi came along and did a bunch of famous protests involving civil disobedience, England responded with military force, which undermined their moral standing to rule India, then India agitated even more, and finally England recognized that the only way they were going to hold on to India was by total war, so they gave up and "let India go". Because hanging on to it would have been ruinous for the Empire in numerous ways - financially/militarily, not to mention morally.
Just popping in to inform you that you are WRONG, Gandhi gets all the credit because it's a good story but the INC was a broad front of which Mahatama was merely one figurehead of, his main competitor was the now infamous Chandra Bose who was notably less pacifist (he fought for the Japs in Burma).
Play more HOI4 before you make bullshit historical allegories please.
 
Men of the Farms: is that true?
Andrea Dworkin was a sex deprived kookie kikess who married a closet homosexual. Or, perhaps, made her husband hate women so much that he preferred to take it up the ass. Either way, no. It isn't true. Everything she shat out into the world is a product of her distorted worldview on relationship between men and women
 
Andrea Dworkin is beautiful even if she's not fitting (pun unintended) made up bullshit beauty standarts (made up mostly by women btw) in a male dominated world
SAD
merlin_150961230_e08177b1-11e7-4eb7-bc99-4cbe246240c7-superJumbo-1234429559.webp
 
Do Men like Women? Hell, most men's entire lives are a sad and desperate attempt to get women to like them back.

You're getting this wrong in both directions. The desperate and sad man doesn't have to like her to try and fuck her.

So he's not trying to be liked and he doesn't necessarily like her.

Or rather, the being liked is a pretext. And that's why these men are sad and desperate.
 
Last edited:
Back