cwkcwdwdcw
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2024
Looks like losing one defamation case was not enough for Nick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except Sisyphus was happy. Hard pass.He can be a modern day Sisyphus - doomed to roll the sameboulderballdo uphill for eternity.
Its funny that Nick blames the only person who wasn't in the house for months, instead of the actual Nanny (April), which he identified as such to the police.I think we need a timeline of when the nanny quit, when April took over as "nanny" and when the arrest happened.
What’s frustrating about this kind of vague, slippery way of talking isn’t just that it makes honest discussion harder. It’s that the person doing it often seems to think they’re being clever. They’ll word things just vaguely enough so they can later say, “I never actually said that,” as if no one can tell what they were really getting at. But it’s not fooling anyone. Most people can see right through it. The real issue is that they seem to believe this kind of wordplay shows how sharp they are, when really it just makes them come across as insecure and not worth taking seriously.
Probably Nick didn't consented to April fucking her still husband, he expected evveryone to ask him for premision, as a sign of respect to the head of the family. Or he's just retarded, implying rape becasue "i didn't said that he raped her", its the same song and dance of Nick being a faggot unable to say something just implying.What does "less consensual" even mean?
"Stupid kiwifags, I never said it was non consensual. I said it became less fun!"View attachment 7390484
View attachment 7390483
View attachment 7390482
Nick is treading dangerously with these bullshit rape allegations.
View attachment 7390489
Especially when April later denied it. Aaron really needs to consider a HRO.
I hope they interview Nick's daughter because of all of this. I will predict this like I have a crystal ball. Most likely, when Nick was talking to his "favorite" child, who he also tends to always suggest is the fun one, she likely saw a bottle of whiskey in his office or the other various places he hoards it, and said she drank it once. I highly doubt she could even communicate what whiskey is and so I presume she pointed out a bottle. And, instead of considering it happened due to him and Kayla (who has no job or anything to do all day other than be a junky) being absentee parents, he coached her to say it was the Nanny who gave it to her. He probably elicited it by saying "You tried it from (nanny) right?".I wonder if one of his retarded fans reported it to CPS after he named her.
That was a cope invented by a French communist.Except Sisyphus was happy. Hard pass.
Would be great if it’s Schneider’s firm."He says, [Quoting Josh] "I'll tease it this way. There's two lawyers and an entire law firm involved. They all want it and I've confirmed someone has seen it. It's going to happen and it's not going to vindicate him." [Unquote].
But none of that has anything whatsoever to do with the nanny. Those are kid expenses. That is not money to her, for her, or otherwise relevant at all. In fact, he should have given her a credit card to use for all of it, not had her charge it then be at his mercy while he decides what looks right and when to reimburse. I can only imagine the inquisition.
This makes it sound like the kids said something innocuous and Nick overanalyzed it and came to the conclusion she gave them alcohol.