Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 73 10.8%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.1%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.0%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 70 10.4%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    673
I think we need a timeline of when the nanny quit, when April took over as "nanny" and when the arrest happened.
Its funny that Nick blames the only person who wasn't in the house for months, instead of the actual Nanny (April), which he identified as such to the police.
 
View attachment 7390596
"good at wording"
eh?
wtf
What’s frustrating about this kind of vague, slippery way of talking isn’t just that it makes honest discussion harder. It’s that the person doing it often seems to think they’re being clever. They’ll word things just vaguely enough so they can later say, “I never actually said that,” as if no one can tell what they were really getting at. But it’s not fooling anyone. Most people can see right through it. The real issue is that they seem to believe this kind of wordplay shows how sharp they are, when really it just makes them come across as insecure and not worth taking seriously.
 
What does "less consensual" even mean?
Probably Nick didn't consented to April fucking her still husband, he expected evveryone to ask him for premision, as a sign of respect to the head of the family. Or he's just retarded, implying rape becasue "i didn't said that he raped her", its the same song and dance of Nick being a faggot unable to say something just implying.
 
I wonder if one of his retarded fans reported it to CPS after he named her.
I hope they interview Nick's daughter because of all of this. I will predict this like I have a crystal ball. Most likely, when Nick was talking to his "favorite" child, who he also tends to always suggest is the fun one, she likely saw a bottle of whiskey in his office or the other various places he hoards it, and said she drank it once. I highly doubt she could even communicate what whiskey is and so I presume she pointed out a bottle. And, instead of considering it happened due to him and Kayla (who has no job or anything to do all day other than be a junky) being absentee parents, he coached her to say it was the Nanny who gave it to her. He probably elicited it by saying "You tried it from (nanny) right?".

He would never go to the cops because CPS would probably want to speak with the child. It might then also come out what other potential degeneracy this child has endured at his hands. It is totally within the realm of possibility that he is not only using the Nanny to project everything he thinks, feels and did, but it might also come to light that he is SAing his youngest child. It might sound like a leap, but I personally think not. As part of his explanation, he explains that the reason for why the Nanny would drink with this child vs the 17 year old is because of her personality. He revers her as the favorite.

When he is drunk and high, he has coke smeared all across his face. Would not suprise me if the child ingested it while he was potentially abusing her. He has defamed several people as pedophiles and is a known projector. And Kayla, who could hardly be called a mother on account of the fact he's high in her bedroom all day, might even know about it and has trouble coping with this life, where they both clearly lament being parents.

Now that we know he is a drug addict, sexual degenerate who is clearly mentally ill, I think all of these conclusions are not farfetched. Just posting this now in case these allegations prove to be true down the line. This situation seems far from over.
 
Last edited:
As per the Kino Casino on the 19th of May.

[PPP] "Josh has sent me five messages on the
Josh phone."

"He says, [Quoting Josh] "I'll tease it this way. There's two lawyers and an entire law firm involved. They all want it, and I've confirmed someone has seen it. It's going to happen and it's not going to vindicate him." [Unquote].
 
Last edited:
Nick is just giving away super berries to Jersh and Kino Casino who will continue to cover his nonsense. I really can’t fathom what he was thinking (he wasn’t) by going scorched earth on a nanny who has been out of the picture for more than a year, and who, by his own admission, didn’t say anything bad to Candy Yoshi County Human Services.

Swiss cheese brain confirmed. If this is his attempt to get ahead of the body cam footage, he has failed spectacularly. All this does is contribute to a conspiracy that the body cam footage can resolve.

Baffling.
 
But none of that has anything whatsoever to do with the nanny. Those are kid expenses. That is not money to her, for her, or otherwise relevant at all. In fact, he should have given her a credit card to use for all of it, not had her charge it then be at his mercy while he decides what looks right and when to reimburse. I can only imagine the inquisition.

What are the chances the Trust pays all the kids' expenses, and the reimbursement is to reimburse Nick with the Trust's money, hence why everything including the snack budget was stretched to incredulity.
 
Back