Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
Sep 15, 2020
Terminated
Apr 22, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Aug 6, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Aug 6, 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
May 15, 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
Apr 28, 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
Apr 25, 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
Oct 26, 2021
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
Oct 15, 2023
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 11)
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010936535
Oct 15, 2023
Case termination for opinion
10010794067
Jan 5, 2023
[10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785
Jan 2, 2023
[10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728
Dec 1, 2022
[10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140
Nov 30, 2022
[10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Terminated
Jun 10, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Oct 16, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Oct 16, 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
Oct 15, 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469
Apr 13, 2026
MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026)
View attachment 7391568
‘OBJECTION! How dare you release publicly available documents to the public! Don’t you know that Mr Hardin is a big meanie poopoo head?’
Russ is getting increasingly deranged in these exchanges with Mr Hardin. How long before we get a version of ‘To All Judges?’
Man, he didn't specify which police, now our intrepid investigators will have to file still more public records requests to locate the report that almost certainly wasn't filed. Come on Russ, include a report number and jurisdiction next time.
US code states that the court SHALL dismiss the case -- not "may" do so, but SHALL dismiss -- if it's determined the allegation of poverty is untrue, as we've mentioned a few times in this thread previously.
I suppose dismissal is the sensible, quickest, and best remedy but I have this itching hope he manages to violate something so substantial that it enters court recommendation for criminal prosecution. I guess contempt would be the most any could hope for such a pitiful retard.
I'll keep visualizing it while rubbing magic quartz crystals and reading horoscopes in hope.
Let's suppose some judge or judge-like entity determined a fraud was knowingly committed upon the court for the purpose of a malicious and bad-faith nonprosecution of a case by a plaintiff in a civil case.
Which options would these entitites have to remedy the situation? Which options would a supposed defendant have to remedy the situation?
IFP fraud to the extent Greer was proceeding non IFP in other Courts (to maintain his illusion of well heeled flush with cash Pimpdaddy Brothel businessman and advocate) while claiming IFP in this court should require the case be dismissed with Prejudice under the statute.
Who cares? Greer has used multiple email addresses too. Dipshitforlips will grasp at anything resembling a straw at this point.
On another note, I sure would love to see what this PDF attachment consists of. It might just be a PDF printout of the SilverFlume pages of the new LLC, but I wonder if Hardin managed to secure any of the backend details on the "officers" we've discussed.
HELLO! Look who was present! Our friend Ruth, AND Roger Baylocq, one of the owners of Lithium Investments LLC (that owns the motel Greer wants to "parcel off" for hookers!
Greer has also apparently/allegedly attempted to purchase that part of the motel property. Hardin can add this to his growing pile of evidence that Greer is a real estate tycoon who can afford things!
So the Defendants didn't specify the great prejudice they suffered and then in the next sentence you repeat the specifics of the prejudice they informed you they suffered?
Greer seems to believe that Josh's financial expenditures and time-wasting in response to Greer's frivolous legal tactics and lies don't constitute prejudice. As far as I can guess, he seems to believe there's no prejudice because the whole point of his suit is to make Josh suffer by wasting his time and money. In Greer's paralyzed mind, he can't grasp how the rightful consequences Josh is suffering can also constitute prejudice.
It's really astounding to see that Greer thought he could get away with paying over $400 to be a brothel dilettante on the same day he claimed he can't pay required filing fees. Isn't the whole basis of this lawsuit—in Greer's own words—the fact that Josh runs a website that stalks Greer's business and legal activities? Why would he think that these ~horrible stalkers~ wouldn't also find the records of his business dealings in a state that demands so much transparency?
The IFP fraud should really be the center of a motion to dismiss, pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1915(e)(2)(A):
Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that—
(A) the allegation of poverty is untrue
I imagine Mr Baylocq's surprise will be nothing compared to that of Mr Huber when he finds out his name has been attached to a brothel company by Greer.