Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 110 24.0%

  • Total voters
    458
IMG_4521.webp
‘OBJECTION! How dare you release publicly available documents to the public! Don’t you know that Mr Hardin is a big meanie poopoo head?’

Russ is getting increasingly deranged in these exchanges with Mr Hardin. How long before we get a version of ‘To All Judges?’
 
View attachment 7391568
‘OBJECTION! How dare you release publicly available documents to the public! Don’t you know that Mr Hardin is a big meanie poopoo head?’

Russ is getting increasingly deranged in these exchanges with Mr Hardin. How long before we get a version of ‘To All Judges?’
Man, he didn't specify which police, now our intrepid investigators will have to file still more public records requests to locate the report that almost certainly wasn't filed. Come on Russ, include a report number and jurisdiction next time.
 
US code states that the court SHALL dismiss the case -- not "may" do so, but SHALL dismiss -- if it's determined the allegation of poverty is untrue, as we've mentioned a few times in this thread previously.

I suppose dismissal is the sensible, quickest, and best remedy but I have this itching hope he manages to violate something so substantial that it enters court recommendation for criminal prosecution. I guess contempt would be the most any could hope for such a pitiful retard.

I'll keep visualizing it while rubbing magic quartz crystals and reading horoscopes in hope.
 
Let's suppose some judge or judge-like entity determined a fraud was knowingly committed upon the court for the purpose of a malicious and bad-faith nonprosecution of a case by a plaintiff in a civil case.

Which options would these entitites have to remedy the situation? Which options would a supposed defendant have to remedy the situation?

Will any stalker children enjoy prison?
IFP fraud to the extent Greer was proceeding non IFP in other Courts (to maintain his illusion of well heeled flush with cash Pimpdaddy Brothel businessman and advocate) while claiming IFP in this court should require the case be dismissed with Prejudice under the statute.
 
View attachment 7391621
I didn't even notice this, why is Hardin using 3 different email addresses?

Who cares? Greer has used multiple email addresses too. Dipshitforlips will grasp at anything resembling a straw at this point.

On another note, I sure would love to see what this PDF attachment consists of. It might just be a PDF printout of the SilverFlume pages of the new LLC, but I wonder if Hardin managed to secure any of the backend details on the "officers" we've discussed.
1747843289931.webp
 
Council minutes for May 6th

HELLO! Look who was present! Our friend Ruth, AND Roger Baylocq, one of the owners of Lithium Investments LLC (that owns the motel Greer wants to "parcel off" for hookers!

1747843544164.webp

Greer has also apparently/allegedly attempted to purchase that part of the motel property. Hardin can add this to his growing pile of evidence that Greer is a real estate tycoon who can afford things!
1747843712622.webp

FUCKING LOL, LMAO EVEN!
1747843757484.webp
 
So the Defendants didn't specify the great prejudice they suffered and then in the next sentence you repeat the specifics of the prejudice they informed you they suffered?
Greer seems to believe that Josh's financial expenditures and time-wasting in response to Greer's frivolous legal tactics and lies don't constitute prejudice. As far as I can guess, he seems to believe there's no prejudice because the whole point of his suit is to make Josh suffer by wasting his time and money. In Greer's paralyzed mind, he can't grasp how the rightful consequences Josh is suffering can also constitute prejudice.

It's really astounding to see that Greer thought he could get away with paying over $400 to be a brothel dilettante on the same day he claimed he can't pay required filing fees. Isn't the whole basis of this lawsuit—in Greer's own words—the fact that Josh runs a website that stalks Greer's business and legal activities? Why would he think that these ~horrible stalkers~ wouldn't also find the records of his business dealings in a state that demands so much transparency?

The IFP fraud should really be the center of a motion to dismiss, pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1915(e)(2)(A):
Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that—
(A) the allegation of poverty is untrue

The statute seems pretty clear to me.
 
Back