You are afforded the right to the process that’s due. There are many processes for a variety of situations.
Alexander the great did it, and the Persians before him. Not to mention the mudslimes who did it after him. Plenty of people have invaded that part of the world and won.
Since when did the the Democrats follow the constitution? If they can wipe their ass with it to take away my rights the I can wipe my ass with it to take away theirs.
That says nothing about depriving basic rights such as speech to aliens. They were revoked because of communist affiliation not their op-ed saying bombing babies is wrong.
Bold of you to call me the cuck when you’re the one with a persecution complex who can’t even describe what rights were withheld from you.
Correct, but just saying "due process" is meaningless without identifying what process is actually due.
Yes, that was John Badman’s entire point
Except for the fact that it literally states that visa holders do not have free speech and their visa status can be revoked for any reason the government chooses.
What do you think a custodian is buddy? The janitor?
Under what law are you invoking protections for VISA holders? Bouarfa v. Mayorka ruled the executive branch can cancel VISAs at anytime.
They got due process though. The due process for illegal immigrants as voted on by duly elected officials voted in by the people, signed into law by the President, and upheld by a court several times, states that the only due process illegal immigrants are owed is that ICE does their investigation and if they conclude you are illegal, they can deport you. All at the discretion of USCBP and they have final say in all manners of deportation regardless of what anyone else says.
Yamataya v. Fisher and Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei
“Calling someone the n-word? Too far! But a government sponsored genocide song? It’s just words, bro.”
That's three groups of people, none of whom held it. Persians never held it, Macedonians never held it after Alexander the Great died and the Arabs never held it, although the Islamic ideology has persisted.
Neither of those cases have anything do with the federal government's ability to revoke VISAs. Both of those cases dealt with deportation procedures... not the legality of the executive branch to reject VISAs.
Got me, but read it. Habeas Corpus really is just 1 government entity proving to another government enity they have the right to hold someone as a prisoner
It doesn't matter whether the courts say otherwise. It was overridden by both other branches of government and the Supreme Court that lower courts cannot stop deportations. Nobody can stop deportations. Their due process is ICE does their thing and they can deport whomever they want, whenever they want, as long as that person isn't a citizen.
