EU Hitler serves as a warning to today’s conservatives, EU’s Manfred Weber says - The European People’s Party chief tells POLITICO he is trying to strike a balance between relying on far-right support while blocking extremists from power.

Hitler serves as a warning to today’s conservatives, EU’s Manfred Weber says
Politico EU (archive.ph)
By Max Griera
2025-05-22 02:44:53GMT

eu01.webp
The EPP and its leader Manfred Weber have received a wave of criticism from the Socialists, liberals and Greens for tilting rightward after June's Parliament election. | Teresa Suarez/EFE via EPA

BRUSSELS ― Germany’s Nazi past should serve as a warning to Europe’s conservatives as they wrestle with how far to rely on support from the far right to push through their policies, the EU’s center-right leader said.

In an exclusive POLITICO interview, Manfred Weber said he believes the European People’s Party ― the umbrella group of center-right parties from across the continent that Weber leads ― has a huge mandate to deliver right-wing programs, but must do so without committing the same mistakes that Germany’s conservatives did in the 1930s when they enabled Adolf Hitler to come to power.

“Having also my German history in mind with Weimar and the Nazi regime, then the real historic mistake was to give right-extreme politicians executive power, and that is for us the red line,” he said.

But the party walks a tightrope. While not actively negotiating with the far right, the EPP can often depend on its votes in the European Parliament, becoming bedfellows in areas such as migration and deregulation ― exactly the sort of issues, the EPP feels, that motivated voters to support it.

“I would love to see a different situation in the European Parliament,” Weber said. “But they are here, they have a vote … and the EPP has one principle and that is following our promises.”

Weber personally, and the EPP more broadly, have been criticized by the Socialists, liberals and Greens for tilting rightward after the June Parliament election in both policy and rhetoric. Those critics argue the EPP has cozied up to politicians they consider extreme, such as Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and her Brothers of Italy party, which Weber deems sufficiently moderate to team up with in a loose coalition dubbed the Venezuela majority.

Right-wing answers
The EPP is home to heavyweights such as European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk. Since last June’s election it has held control of the EU’s main institutions ― the Commission, the Parliament and the Council ― and so holds sway over swaths of decision-making.

Weber, a member of the Christian Social Union (the Bavarian sister party of Merz’s CDU), said the election results — which gave the EPP the largest number of MEPs — followed a surge of far-right forces signaling that citizens want right-wing answers to their problems and ending the center-left consensus that had dominated the previous term in Brussels.

His ideal scenario, Weber said, is to work with centrist parties to enable a right-wing shift.

Weber said he is aware that on key issues such as defense, foreign affairs and budget “there is no possibility of achieving anything … to develop Europe together with the far right.”

Ahead of the June 2024 European election the party took over topics pushed by populist movements and made them their own. They are now being translated into EU policy ― which is one of Weber’s strategies to keep voters out of the clutches of extremist parties.

“We are fighting against the right extreme … this is only possible if we do policy change to answer what people ask us to do,” Weber said, claiming that the EPP is the only party that is taking steps to fight the far-right surge. “The others speak about it, but we are doing it.”

eu02.webp
A sign reads: “Hitler was also democratically elected.” Weber said the European People’s Party has a huge mandate to deliver right-wing programs, but it must do so without committing the same mistakes as Germany’s conservatives did in the 1930s when they enabled Adolf Hitler to come to power. | Clemence Bilan/EFE via EPA

Most notably, on migration, the EPP vowed to boost deportations and border control. They also promised to deregulate by reopening key green legislative files. In the Parliament they have counted on far-right support to press through their policy goals, such as watering down a deforestation bill and bringing down the EU ethics body.

Despite Weber’s red line of not allowing extreme forces into positions of power, some of the EPP’s national parties are taking their own path. In Spain, for example, the Partido Popular has previously formed governments in several regions with the far-right Vox, which is affiliated with the Patriots for Europe party at the European level.

“There is no left-liberal majority anymore in this house, and that must also be translated in politics, things must change after 180 million people went to [the] ballot boxes,” Weber said. “That’s why, for me, [the] key is that our agenda is dominating now the European agenda.”
 
this has lost all meaning because you retards compared normies to Hitler
Hitler has been watered down from overuse and is now a generic left-wing insult. Oh, I voted for Trump? Guess I'm a Hitler supporter. I don't want unlimited jeets and illegals shitting up my cities? I must be a Nazi.

At this point, I'm like Nigga Heil Hitler.
 
I'm just gonna go full mel brooks and become hitler for the funny. No that does not mean I'm gonna kill people mr. cia or nsa agent possibly reading this thread, it means I'm gonna perform the hitler rap.
 
If the Weimar elites had simply held out the Nazis might have been crushed in the next election, the party was already bankrupt and its support was eroding. Plus the "right" gave the Nazis all the power, it wasn't a legitimate coalition with power sharing. Hitler refused to ever take a lower position in a coalition because it would defang the movements radicalism. So this dude's logic is completely backwards from the lesson from Weimar, accept the "far-right" into a coalition as long as you deny them full power and let their supporters turn on the leadership.

People who tell others to learn lessons from history should probably learn it first.
 
You could elect the most far-right, Hitlery candidate imaginable in Germ, France, wherever, and it would not have similar results because the military situation is so different from 80-100 years ago.
Nah, if Poland got a funny mustache man, they could just conquer everything to the west. No one has a military worth snuff west of Poland if the US withdraws. WW2 was fought at a time not long after WW1 and the major powers of Europe had militaries that could be scaled up. Populationwise, Europe has the same population today as it did 80 years ago. However, the military capable population is a shadow of what it used to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rapesputin
Hitler's long-held status as evil personified starts to lose its grip when you compare everyone to the right of Bernie to him
When everyone's a fascist, nobody is, and when nobody's a fascist, Western society's stigmas against fascism become irrelevant, thus allowing actual fascists to take power should they move to do so
 
LOL. Every retard compares Hitler to someone they hate nowadays......

You don't like niggers/pajeets? You're like Hitler.
You read Mein Kampf? You're like Hitler.
You supported a Republican? You're like Hitler.
You dislike what fags do on their spare time? You're like Hitler.

Bitch, please. Calling people Nazis lost all of its meaning at this point.
 
Throwing around the """H""" word has only generated interest in the topic.

If these people had any understanding of normal human behavior, they would get that the nonstop villainization creates morbid curiosity in the subject.

Keep bringing up Nazis and Hitler like some mystical boogieman. When people see that he was just a man who wasn't 100% incorrect about everything, they're going to start asking some really uncomfortable questions the establishment isn't going to like.
 
has a huge mandate to deliver right-wing programs, but must do so without committing the same mistakes that Germany’s conservatives did in the 1930s when they enabled Adolf Hitler to come to power.
"We should deliver on right-wing programs, but be careful not to commit a genocide or start another World War."

Powerful. Brave.
1747899039888.webp
 
Just the picture shows why physiognomy bros keep winning. This spineless creature looks like a loser who will fold immediately when confronted by leftists. They will call him a Hitler, and he will be on his hands and knees begging in tears for forgiveness. He will walk back those "tuff on immigration" promises the first time he is shown the picture of a crying brown child. He will still be called a Hitler nevertheless.

The only way Europeans can fix their mess is to disregard the emotional blackmail and stop being a doormat. It won't happen with this guy, so the way to fix the mess is to get rid of leaders like him.
 
Hitler's long-held status as evil personified starts to lose its grip when you compare everyone to the right of Bernie to him
When everyone's a fascist, nobody is, and when nobody's a fascist, Western society's stigmas against fascism become irrelevant, thus allowing actual fascists to take power should they move to do so
Except nobody is actually a fascist. Nobody on the Right believes in a divine State that can define reality, and create from its ranks a human incarnation of the divine State with which to guide the people that are born a part of the State and will die a part of the State.

Fascism is Liberalism on steroids. It amps up the government and institution worship to 11 and tells all the little children that anyone can work hard and be the Fuherer one day.

It's why there is always so much confusion as to whether Hitler was Right Wing or Left Wing. These terms are only relevant within the context of a Liberal Society. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were ALL Liberals. They were all the products of the Liberal revolutions that came out of the age of Enlightenment. They all fundamentally agreed on core doctrine. They differentiated only in how to implement it.

For those of us who reject Liberalism entirely as a failed experiment, including democracy, direct republicanism, the liberal State and the concept of all men being equal, it's a tired argument. We are apparently fascists too.
 
Back