- Joined
- Feb 20, 2025
His visible short-circuit over why the nanny wasn’t immediately fired for gross misconduct was comedic.This nanny thing is so dumb, a massive self-own. If true, Nick is a bad father. If false, Nick is an even worse person.
And either way, it all reeks of a man flailing to gain control of a narrative because he's backed into a corner and seething every moment of every day.
Where did the old Nick go? Was he even real?
No, Nick—she didn’t need to “stick around for a week.” Any country in this entire world allows you to fire people or at least put them on immediate leave for gross misconduct. If it is true, you intentionally let this supposed incident slip to suit your own hedonistic lifestyle.
Ironically, it wasn’t the alleged drunkenness that pushed Nick to speak out publicly, but the claim that she gave alcohol to children.
Was that truly the breaking point?
His comments about her employment are riddled with contradictions. She was supposedly an abusive alcoholic, yet she "abandoned" the family—as if her departure was a betrayal rather than a relief? It makes no sense
Why would he feel "abandoned" by someone he claims was getting drunk in his bed, leaving the kids vulnerable? That kind of attached wording doesn’t align with the outrage he’s now performing.
I think the relationship with the nanny was far too personal and over relied upon. I hope she has the stones to tell her side of the story soon.