Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 31.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 87 32.6%

  • Total voters
    267
He's desperate to reintroduce the concept of non-trial streams which can also generate enough income to be considered gainful employment.
So in his mind, members only stream is going to be better than YT stream where more alogs can send money in pedotips? But what would i know, i never lost house due to leveraging debt.
Which is why Nick deserves it. After that?
Nick doing something really stupid like OD, or wraping rustang around the tree after getting court raped by Monty to lock in the 3rd year and finish it once and for all.
 
Two LOTY can be done, but 3? Three is exceptional levels of pathetic. Which is why Nick deserves it. After that? Sure pull him make a separate category award based on him.
But let him have 3 just so people understand why he is what he is.
In a desperate attempt to regain relevancy, having learned from this thread that he is disqualified for LOTY, he is attempting to rekindle the magic that got him the first win with "OHHH MAAAANDY"
 
Rumble seems to inflate their numbers and he’s still only showing 89. I’d love to see the internal cost/benefit analysis Rumble did on their investment in this fag.
Bold of you to assume the retards at Rumble were either willing or capable of doing something so basic.

Legit question, is it a violation of Youtube and Rumble's TOS to bypass their systems like that?
Probably not as is. Of course TOS is whatever they say, and it wouldn't surprise me if either they changed it, or even simply found a discretionary reason to ban faggots over supertips regardless.

I think it's more likely for Rumble to do something in this regard since, per their most recent quarterly financials, something like 4-5% of their total revenue was their cut from people tipping creators through Rumble. I think if pedotips even remotely started materially affecting that they'd bitchslap it.
 
Only a small piece of his favorite song:
View attachment 7397978
Oh dear, this is truly dreadful. Karaoke appears to be one of his favorite pastimes—so why is he so remarkably bad at it?

Is this really what he subjects his paying members on YouTube and Locals to? My condolences to them. Honestly, clippers deserve hazard pay.
 
Oh dear, this is truly dreadful. Karaoke appears to be one of his favorite pastimes—so why is he so remarkably bad at it?
He turned it into a power ballad about his love of men, fitting.

FFS I could get 89 people to listen to me drone on about East Germany for hours if I worked at it. I also have a much more pleasant sounding voice and better vocal range if I do say so myself.

Your missing the through-the-wall thumping of a headboard while Aaron groans "Another Win for the Toe!", as he blows loads in Nick's wife.
Meanwhile April is bleeding from the Balldo because Nick's industrial-strength dick pills aren't working.
 
Nonetheless, they are used widely by LEO, psychologists, and interrogators. Nick's are obvious at this point. Here is a selection from the nanny story:
Something that amazes me about pathological liars like Nick is they do one thing. They lie. That's literally all they do. They can't open their cockholsters without a lie coming out. And yet they can't even learn the most basic liar's tells to avoid.

You literally have one job. And it's to lie. And you can't even do that right.

Staring frantically at ceiling cats while lying. Pulling on their earlobes. Constantly touching their noses. You could turn the sound off and tell when this faggot is lying and how much he's lying, literally I don't even know what he's saying but this is kind of a lie, this is a medium-sized lie, this is some shit he totally made up.

In January and February (the months in question), Nick was on a full-scale coke, ketamine, and alcohol bender. None of his memories are reliable.
This is another thing to remember. Even pathological liars who don't have brain damage actually know the facts. Nick has brain damage. He doesn't. He literally isn't even certain of the actual facts, and that is why, much like the Wernicke-Korsakoff patient he is very likely to end up as, he is continually confabulating the most convenient story for whatever is going on in that very minute.

He doesn't know the facts, because his brain damage prevents him from remembering them, so he just makes shit up. He knows it's probably bullshit but it doesn't contradict anything he remembers, because he can't remember shit.

He literally can't remember his own life from day to day.

The Disco Elysium comparison becomes more apt every day.
 
Tbh this is the absolute least of his flaws. Practicing law kind of sucks if you don't have some niche you like. Of all the people I know with law degrees, less than half do anything that could be called the practice of law. And of those, almost all are out of court stuff like transactional law, in-house counsel with very little actual litigation, appellate practictioners, and things like an ALJ or a patent agent (like Kurt was). I only know two actual trial lawyers personally and both of them were because of actual litigation, not meeting them socially.
I do exactly what Nick said he did (solo general practice with an emphasis on criminal defense) and I find it kind of offensive that he basically pretended to be a litigator because it has the clout of being the job normies think of when they hear "lawyer". With the number of cases he was entered on over the three or four years he "actively practiced" there's no way I believe he ever even had a month where he was in the black, let alone supported his family through the practice of law.
 
Last edited:
Funny, and weird. Everyone in that house had easy access to all kinds of stimulants, but at the same time we are supposed to believe his daughter could have never gotten into his coke stash.

Nick only lies on days his nose is read.
“I used to smoke marijuana. But I’ll tell you something: I would only smoke it in the late evening. Oh, occasionally the early evening, but usually the late evening – or the mid-evening. Just the early evening, midevening and late evening. Occasionally, early afternoon, early midafternoon, or perhaps the late-midafternoon. Oh, sometimes the early-mid-late-early morning. . . . But never at dusk.” Steve Martin
 
Without wading too deeply into the area of behavioral 'tells' and eye movements that investigators use to detect lying...

(There are major caveats that include a person's baseline, psychological issues, medication etc. It's more of an art than a science.)

Nonetheless, they are used widely by LEO, psychologists, and interrogators. Nick's are obvious at this point. Here is a selection from the nanny story:

View attachment 7395988View attachment 7395938View attachment 7395939
He looks up and to the right (dominant side) when he's telling ALL stories (true or not). But he does it A LOT when he's lying.

In the last screenshot his eyes are particularly exaggerated along with the head tilt. This is when he said there was no "untoward activity toward her".

And, obviously, not making any eye contact is very telling (every parent knows this).
View attachment 7395951
This is when he said that they've contacted Chaney's current employer.

Funny, when he looks to his left (non-dominant side), it's usually when he's telling the truth or trying to remember accurate facts:
View attachment 7395968
This is when he is recalling how many live shows/week he was trying to do when the nanny left.
....


And, yes, he has a screen to his right, and most of us look upward to our dominant side when conversing. I chose screenshots where he's not looking at his screen and when he's doing it more than usual.

I'm not proving any big case here. I'm merely pointing out 'tells'. I like that Andy and PPP noticed some of this in their coverage last night.

Edit: Typo
Without power leveling etc.etc. it is invariably accurate and the baseline stuff is a myth. Each subject is encouraged to talk. Their own behavior is the only baseline. We always know if there is a lie or something untrue or unreliable going in, and however they behave around that, that's the baseline right there I guess you could say. It's sometimes a physical twitch like a literal twitch. Duper's Delight is a real thing too and the inappropriate smiling by Rekieta is exactly that. He thinks he is smarter than everyone else. But on another level he is also terrified. Good combination for interrogation.

But the absolute law of nature is the delay between direct question and direct answer (if any) so in that regard the entire nanny story is itself a delay between direct question and any direct answer.
He is obfuscating about

1. state of house
2. child being given or taking cocaine
3. sexual advances to the nanny
4. what he spends his allowance from his mom on
5. his wife (never mentioned even though she was the mother of the children and the only female caregiver at the time pre polycule)
6. his own caregiving of his own children

He also omitted expected details about the nanny and her behavior.

And so on.

It isn't an art, it is a science. Behavioral science. Some people have a knack for it I guess like anything else but even complete moron deputies can sit there and write out long hand what some Adam Henry is saying. And we know Adam loves to talk. Let them talk along enough and they always confess. Sure as the sun will set.
 
I don't think a rule exists that specifically covers this, but it should fall under the blanket "don't do things that harm YouTube" clause.
Because what they are doing is divert money away from the Superchats feature, into a ThirdParty alternative, thereby cutting out YouTube, which could be interpreted as "harm".
YouTube doesn't give a flying fuck about the law or even its own policies.

They just do whatever the fuck they feel like. If pedotips pisses them off, it's gone.
 
Tbh this is the absolute least of his flaws. Practicing law kind of sucks if you don't have some niche you like. Of all the people I know with law degrees, less than half do anything that could be called the practice of law. And of those, almost all are out of court stuff like transactional law, in-house counsel with very little actual litigation, appellate practictioners, and things like an ALJ or a patent agent (like Kurt was). I only know two actual trial lawyers personally and both of them were because of actual litigation, not meeting them socially.

It takes a very special kind of monster to be a trial lawyer. Most lawyers are not trial lawyers.

I would have made exactly the choice Nick made if I'd had it. By that I mean of course being some hot shot streamer, not dosing kids with cocaine and putting on Balldos and all that other shit.
Yes, of course. But people who no longer practice don't go around holding themselves out as "X Law," or keep up brands and descriptors indicating they own law firms.

And transactional lawyers are full lawyers, doing law, being lawyers. It's not a lesser way to practice, by far. Same goes for all the other kinds of counsel who do not litigate. There's nothing particularly elevated about trial work.

But to be clear, I was responding to the suggestion that
He has a fucking law degree. He could have logged off, practiced law, and lived a more comfortable life than most of the posters in this thread. But that wouldn't be enough for him.

And the reality is that he could not have done. Because he was a bad lawyer, sloppy and admittedly lazy, and what lawyering he did was brief, few, and poorly done.

No shame in leaving practicing behind, whatsoever. But Nick will never be a good lawyer.
 
If there isn't one, they can always mail the sample.
If the state did that, Nick would just claim that the sample got contaminated in transit, or some other bullshit.
"People send cocaine in the post all the time!" :really:

Snippets from the Rumble chat, including song suggestions:

View attachment 7397768View attachment 7397769View attachment 7397770View attachment 7397771View attachment 7397772View attachment 7397773


Finally, some gay edgelord shit Nick won’t do.
With an audience that loves him this much, Nick should give stand up a second try.
 
Last edited:
“I used to smoke marijuana. But I’ll tell you something: I would only smoke it in the late evening. Oh, occasionally the early evening, but usually the late evening – or the mid-evening. Just the early evening, midevening and late evening. Occasionally, early afternoon, early midafternoon, or perhaps the late-midafternoon. Oh, sometimes the early-mid-late-early morning. . . . But never at dusk.” Steve Martin
I think this is the Nick version.
 
Back