US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The post modernist and their progressive drone only care for destruction

As long as they are tearing down the old they are winning. What will they replace it with? Why their own Utopia of course where....something will happen somehow by somebody.

The truth is all these cultist attacking Western values have nothing to replace it with. 4 years at indoctrination school has taught them that nothing matter, that things just happen and they are just bags of meat and water so they ascribe value only to the act of destruction and never creation.

As an aside being a nihilist is the easy way out. You don't have to do anything, believe in anything, try or strive to do anything and when you fail it's just because the Universe is cruel and random so nothing is ever your fault.

And I thought the fucking Gen X'ers were insufferable but the Millennial's are fucking horrific people who have voluntary given up their humanity because trying might mean failing and their precious ego can't stand that so it's better to just believe in noting and never try.
 

On the morning of Friday, May 23, Harvard filed a 72-page complaint and a 59-page motion for a temporary restraining order against the Department of Homeland Security and other officials. There were nearly thirty exhibits.

Shortly after the case was filed, the case was assigned to Judge Allison D. Burroughs. (She presided over the Harvard affirmative action trial). And almost immediately she granted an Ex Parte TRO.

Accordingly, Defendants, their agents, and anyone acting in concert or participation with Defendants are hereby enjoined from: A. Implementing, instituting, maintaining, or giving effect to the revocation of Plaintiff's SEVP certification; B. Giving any force or effect to the Department of Homeland Security's May 22, 2025 Revocation Notice.
ECF does not have time stamps, but the case could not have been on her docket for more than a few hours.

I have a serious question: did Judge Burroughs even read the 72-page complaint and 59-page motion for a TRO? What about all of the pages of exhibits? Did she have any time to reflect upon it or consider countervailing arguments?

I think of Judge Hendrix. The ACLU expected him to resolve a complex case in the span of hours. The judge, prudently, said that it was not possible to move that quickly. But the Supreme Court in A.A.R.P indicated that lower court judges should just reflexively enter ex parte TROs to preserve the status quo. This mode of judging is reckless, but the Supreme Court has given it a green light.
 
they haven't its just a buzzword to them
To them, Hitler arose out of the ether, materialized out of pure evil racism that persists as the original sin of White people.

There were no fears, concerns, or needs of the Germans that pushed so many people to elect a demagogue. It was only hatred.

Ignore hyperinflation, the lack of a democratic tradition in Germany, the fear of another Bolshevik uprising, starvation, debt. One day, for no reason at all, Germans just wanted to elect a revanchist strong man because they are evil white racists.
 
You know who doesn’t get enough shit for being a Zionist?

Bob Marley
I don't think he was a jewish zionist.

When he and other roots reggae / rastafarians talk about zion, they don't mean Israel. For Rastafarians, it's primarily a spiritual and ancestral concept tied to Ethiopia and liberation. All africans will be free one day. shit like that.

They thought Emperor Haile Selassie I was Jesus resurrected. idk why.
 
Please God, let them negate Biden's last second pardons and prosecute Fauci and Hunter. It would be really funny.
I'd rather see people like the cash for kid's judge locked back up than Hunter. He's a retarded crackhead failure, but there's leagues worse they pardoned than him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davis
I don't know how Trump can stop the full on legal onslaught without permanently destroying the justice systems ability to reign in over reaching POTUS actions but he's going to have to do something.
That's the point.

The entire point of the exercise is to blame him for what happens next. And no, J.D. Vance isn't going to be the guy who fixes everything.

I'd rather see people like the cash for kid's judge locked back up than Hunter. He's a retarded crackhead failure, but there's leagues worse they pardoned than him.
Epstein files. Unredacted. Publicly available.

He could do that any day he wanted to, but hasn't yet. 100+ and counting.
 
Conceptual Equation
Let P(A) represent the probability that Zoomers appropriate a new word from AAVE. This can be modeled as:

P(A)=f(S,C,M,T,R)

Where:
  • S: Social media exposure (e.g., TikTok, X, Instagram) where AAVE terms gain visibility among Zoomers.
  • C: Cultural influence, including the perceived "coolness" or trendiness of AAVE in youth culture.
  • M: Mainstream media amplification (e.g., music, TV, or influencers using AAVE terms).
  • T: Temporal context, as linguistic trends shift over time (e.g., virality of a term).
  • R: Resistance or awareness, reflecting pushback against appropriation due to cultural sensitivity or education.
A simplified probabilistic form could be:

P(A)=1+e−k(T−R)w1S+w2C+w3M

Where:
  • w1,w2,w3: Weights representing the relative influence of social media, cultural factors, and mainstream media (e.g., w1+w2+w3=1).
  • k: A constant scaling the rate of adoption based on temporal and resistance factors.
  • e−k(T−R): A logistic function to model how time and resistance temper the likelihood of appropriation.
Explanation of Variables
  1. Social Media Exposure (S): Platforms like TikTok and X are key vectors for AAVE spread. For example, terms like "slay," "periodt," or "finna" gained traction via viral content. Data from X shows AAVE terms trending among Zoomers, often detached from their cultural roots (e.g., posts using "cap" or "no cap" spiked in 2020–2023).
  2. Cultural Influence (C): AAVE is often seen as "trendy" due to its prominence in hip-hop, fashion, and slang. Zoomers, seeking cultural capital, adopt these terms to signal belonging. Studies (e.g., Rickford & Rickford, 2000) note AAVE's influence on youth vernacular.
  3. Mainstream Media (M): Artists like Lil Nas X or shows like Euphoria amplify AAVE terms, increasing their reach. For instance, "lit" became mainstream via music and TV.
  4. Temporal Context (T): Linguistic trends are cyclical. A term's virality peaks quickly but may fade (e.g., "on fleek" vs. "sksksk"). This is modeled as a time-dependent factor.
  5. Resistance (R): Growing awareness of cultural appropriation (e.g., discussions on X about non-Black people using AAVE) can reduce adoption. Educational content on platforms like TikTok emphasizes respecting AAVE's origi
Example Application

Suppose a new AAVE term, "bussin," trends on TikTok (S=0.8, high exposure), is deemed culturally "cool" (C=0.7), and appears in a popular song (M=0.6). Assume it's 2025, early in the term's viral phase (T=0.9), but there's moderate pushback due to appropriation awareness (R=0.4). With weights w1=0.4, w2=0.3, w3=0.3, and k=1:

P(A)=1+e−1(0.9−0.4)(0.4⋅0.8 )+(0.3⋅0.7)+(0.3⋅0.6)=1+e−0.50.32+0.21+0.18=1+0.60650.71=1.60650.71≈0.4419

This suggests a 44% chance Zoomers will widely adopt "bussin." The moderate probability reflects resistance tempering spread.
 
Exclusive | Tim Cook Called Texas Governor to Stop Online Child-Safety Legislation
The Wall Street Journal (archive.ph)
By Rolfe Winkler, Amrith Ramkumar and Meghan Bobrowsky
23 May 2025 18:12:45 UTC
Apple stepped up efforts in recent weeks to fight Texas legislation that would require the iPhone-maker to verify ages of device users, even drafting Chief Executive Tim Cook into the fight.

The CEO called Texas Gov. Greg Abbott last week to ask for changes to the legislation or, failing that, for a veto, according to people familiar with the call. These people said that the conversation was cordial and that it made clear the extent of Apple’s interest in stopping the bill.

Abbott has yet to say whether he will sign it, though it passed the Texas legislature with veto-proof majorities.

In the weeks leading up to its passage, Apple hired more lobbyists to pressure lawmakers. An interest group it funds targeted the Austin, Texas, area with ads saying the legislation is “backed by porn websites.” Google also finances the interest group and is fighting the legislation.

Texas would be the largest state to adopt what is called an app-store accountability law. Similar laws have been proposed across at least nine states and adopted in one, Utah. Federal legislation also has been introduced. Meta Platforms—along with social-media companies X and Snap—also have played a role in the lobbying fight, advocating that what is known as “age-gating” should be the responsibility of app stores rather than individual apps.

The Texas bill is turning heads because its success in the second-biggest state with a Republican legislature could foreshadow adoption across the country, potentially creating new costs for Apple and Google, as well as for some app makers.

The law requires those running app stores, primarily Apple and Google, to verify the age of a device owner. If the owner is a minor, their app-store account would have to be tied to a parent’s account. The parent would be notified when their child wants to download an app and have to approve or deny the download.

Proponents argue that such laws will give parents more control over their children’s use of smartphones, and that children aren’t legally allowed to agree to apps’ terms of service in the first place.

Critics say such a law could impose costs on a swath of apps whose content isn’t controversial. They also say the bills are allowing Meta and other apps to shunt responsibility for online safety onto others.

One reason the laws are being crafted to have app stores verify ages, and not individual apps that are viewed as problematic, is that the latter approach would likely be struck down on free speech grounds, say those who have helped shepherd the bills.

Meta has 13 lobbyists working in Texas, according to the state’s Ethics Commission. Apple has six and Google has seven.

An Apple spokesman said that the company wants to strengthen online safety for children but that the Texas bill threatens user privacy. “If enacted, app marketplaces will be required to collect and keep sensitive personal identifying information for every Texan who wants to download an app, even if it’s an app that simply provides weather updates or sports scores,” he said.

Meta has said that verifying ages at the app store-level is easier and helps preserve privacy, by only having children’s ages stored in one place instead of on every app they access.

A spokesman for Gov. Abbott said “safety and online privacy for Texas children remains a priority for Governor Abbott. The Governor will thoughtfully review this legislation, as he does with any legislation sent to his desk.”

The age-verification bills are the latest threat to Apple’s lucrative apps business. Last month, a judge forced the company to allow app developers to avoid Apple’s steep commissions on app-store sales, a move the European Union is also pushing for.

It is also the latest sign that Cook is playing a personal role lobbying for the company. When it comes to tariffs, he is known to call President Trump directly to advocate for the company’s position. He was spotted visiting the White House on Tuesday. He also personally donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund.

Apple lobbyists successfully blocked a similar effort in Louisiana last spring, but that bill has returned this year and is advancing.

Some states are moving ahead with app-store bills anyway.

“The more we can help parents understand what their children are really interacting with and give them tools to help them make good parenting decisions, then I think we’re all better off,” said Angela Paxton, the Texas state senator who sponsored the legislation.
 
I feel like he could be head of the Cyrodil chapter of the mages guild
are you talking about Ontus Vanin?

Exclusive | Tim Cook Called Texas Governor to Stop Online Child-Safety Legislation
The Wall Street Journal (archive.ph)
By Rolfe Winkler, Amrith Ramkumar and Meghan Bobrowsky
23 May 2025 18:12:45 UTC
and yet apple supports the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA.

I guess anything that forces others to deal with Kids online safety and not the tech companies who profit off of it.
 
are you talking about Ontus Vanin?


and yet apple supports the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA.

I guess anything that forces others to deal with Kids online safety and not the tech companies who profit off of it.
Can we go back to calling strangers on X-Box Live "niggers"?
 
Back