South Africa’s chief rabbi rejects refugee program for Afrikaners - A vocal critic of the South African government, Goldstein backed Trump’s opposition to South Africa for its cooperation with Iran and its new land expropriation law.

Article / Archive

(JTA) — When Donald Trump entered his second term as president, he found a full-throated supporter in South Africa’s chief rabbi.

Chief Rabbi Warren Goldstein said in February that South Africans “should welcome the Trump administration’s interventions” in the country’s affairs, praising the president in a widely distributed video message.

A vocal critic of the South African government, Goldstein backed Trump’s opposition to South Africa for its cooperation with Iran and its new land expropriation law, which Goldstein believes will slow the country’s already sluggish economy.

But since Trump decided to admit some white South Africans into the United States as refugees — the only refugees he is letting in — Goldstein has changed his tone. He told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that he sees the move as a “mistake.”

“It is wrong to think that the problems that saw white South Africans take up residence in the US are unique to the white community,” said Goldstein. He challenged the Trump administration’s contention that the Afrikaners — a minority that arrived in South Africa in the 17th century whose members led the country’s system of apartheid until its end in 1994 — are being singled out for persecution and what Trump called “genocide” because of their identity.

Like Jewish leaders in the United States and elsewhere, Goldstein finds himself walking a tightrope when it comes to a US president whose pro-Israel and philosemitic rhetoric is often matched by policies that many Jews oppose. Some American Jews have welcomed the attention the administration has paid to campus antisemitism, for example, but many have worried that his attack on universities has been too harsh, blunt and undemocratic.

Trump's clash in South African politics

In South Africa, where Jews strongly identify with Israel, Trump’s general pro-Israel stance is welcome. But there too that stance has clashed with local politics.


Milton Shain, an emeritus professor of South African Jewish history at the University of Cape Town, said the overwhelming majority of South Africans — Jews and non-Jews alike — were perplexed by the idea of some Afrikaners receiving refugee status. He called the rhetoric about a genocide against Afrikaners “absurd” and speculated that there could be a connection between Trump’s policy and South Africa’s decision to file genocide charges against Israel at the International Court of Justice.

“It seems to me that the Trump regime wants to target South Africa for taking Israel to the ICJ,” Shain said. “That is the only reason I can think of for such an odd and sustained initiative.”

But even before the war in Gaza that led to South Africa’s genocide case against Israel, both Trump and his South Africa-born advisor Elon Musk hurled accusations of “genocide” and “the large scale killing of farmers” at South Africa. Their claims are based on documented attacks against white farmers and the complaints echo a subset of South African white nationalists. Although the farm attacks have persisted for years, they represent a small percentage of the country’s high violent crime rate, which affects all parts of the population.

Goldstein said Trump has wrongly framed South Africa’s economic, social and political challenges in racial terms. He pointed to a poll by the Social Research Foundation, which found that 67% of Black South Africans wanted their children to live and work abroad for a better future.

The first group of 59 Afrikaner refugees arrived at Dulles International Airport on Monday. They were greeted with fanfare by Trump officials, including the Jewish deputy secretary of state Christopher Landau, who compared their journey to his father’s escape from Nazi-annexed Austria in 1938.

In the United States, some migration aid groups have said they are morally opposed to resettling the newly arrived Afrikaners. The Episcopal Church said on Monday that it was ending its decades-long partnership with the federal government to resettle refugees, citing its “steadfast commitment to racial justice and reconciliation” and “historic ties with the Anglican Church of Southern Africa.”


The US-based Jewish refugee aid organization HIAS said it would support Afrikaners in their new home. But HIAS’ president Mark Hetfield told The New York Times it was “not right” that this group was singled out for admission.

“We are profoundly disturbed that the administration has slammed the door in the face of thousands of other refugees approved by DHS months ago, notwithstanding courts ordering the White House to let many of them in,” said Hetfield.

On Monday, Trump said he welcomed Afrikaners despite his anti-migrant stance because they were victims of a “genocide.” He suspended resettlement programs for other refugees around the world almost immediately after taking office.

White South Africans, of whom about half are Afrikaners, comprise some 7% of the country’s population and own about 78% of private farmland. Research shows white South Africans collectively have roughly 20 times the wealth of Black South Africans.

South African Jews are a small minority within the white minority, and their ranks are shrinking — after peaking at 120,000 in 1970, the population has declined to less than 50,000. Many Jews have connections to Israel and feel isolated by the frayed relations between Israel and South Africa. Some, said Shain, worry about being identified by their government as allies to its foreign adversaries.

“I believe Rabbi Goldstein’s supportive comments [of Trump] are problematic,” said Shain. “Jews are rapidly being identified as a fifth column, like the far-right Afrikaners, working against the interests of the country by cozying up to the Trump administration.”

Goldstein’s support for Trump drew criticism from other members of the local community. Journalist Anton Harber wrote an essay in February titled “The Chief Rabbi who lost his soul,” writing, “Something is very wrong when a Chief Rabbi sings the praises of political and business figures without mentioning their neo-Nazi affiliations.” Harber referenced a gesture by Musk that drew comparisons to a Nazi salute and his ringing support for Germany’s far-right AfD party, as well as Trump’s past socializing with antisemitic conspiracy theorists.

However, Shain and Goldstein agreed that Jewish South Africans have the same concerns as most South Africans as a whole — violence, corruption, poverty and high unemployment. Many young Jews are leaving South Africa for opportunities elsewhere.

“The challenges facing the community are the same as those facing the country,” Goldstein said. “The more that South Africa as a country will achieve economic growth and thrive, the more the Jewish community will.”
 
It seems like you are splitting hairs when one admits they are calling for genocide and are setting up things so one could occur, but it just hasn't kicked off yet.
It’s very popular to portray these farm murders as impoverished black people spontaneously and opportunistically killing and looting. But there have been perpetrators caught wearing expensive and sophisticated cellphone jammers (many farms don’t have landlines). It’s clear that some of these killings are sponsored by groups of far greater resources than the average kaffir.

IMG_1724.webp
This is a few years old now but would seem to strongly suggest military, police or government involvement in this particular farm attack.
 
"Collectively", so this says nothing about the average farmer. This is a number that sounds like it's being floated by a few extremely wealthy individuals.
That, and the "wealth" farmers have is all tied up in assets like land and livestock, which are as illiquid as they are easy to seize.
 
a fifth column, like the far-right Afrikaners, working against the interests of the country by cozying up to the Trump administration.
At the end of the day, if my government was even remotely capable of protecting my safety, liberty and property I would be a lot less prone to bashing it.
It’s very popular to portray these farm murders as impoverished black people spontaneously and opportunistically killing and looting. But there have been perpetrators caught wearing expensive and sophisticated cellphone jammers (many farms don’t have landlines). It’s clear that some of these killings are sponsored by groups of far greater resources than the average kaffir.

View attachment 7402623
This is a few years old now but would seem to strongly suggest military, police or government involvement in this particular farm attack.
I wouldn’t necessarily say that this means government involvement. It could very well mean that, but it could also mean that the long standing tradition of looting in this country has put military equipment on the black market. State arsenals are raided and sold off constantly. It’s really hard to say.
That, and the "wealth" farmers have is all tied up in assets like land and livestock, which are as illiquid as they are easy to seize.
They don’t have it as good as white collar professionals in the city or anything. But the plain truth is that especially in rural areas, wages for menial workers are so astronomically low that the land owners get to keep the lions share of earnings. This is fundamentally how the country has been structured historically. Apartheid was in large part set up to keep blacks in rural areas to alleviate a farm labour shortage that existed after ww2. Nowadays, farm labour wages are depressed by torrents and torrents of illegal immigration from other parts of Africa. So farm labourers remain eye wateringly poor. This is my personal theory as to why this situation escalating out of control.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
I wouldn’t necessarily say that this means government involvement. It could very well mean that, but it could also mean that the long standing tradition of looting in this country has put military equipment on the black market. State arsenals are raided and sold off constantly. It’s really hard to say.
Man-portable heavy-duty broad spectrum cellphone jammers are an extremely rare piece of equipment that use specialized batteries not commonly available in stores. Even onsold at ten cents to the Rand, how many starving Soweto niggers do you think could front R35,000 for one of these?
To put it another way, if you’re a kaffir out to maak die boer dood and you have money and black market access, are you going to buy a jammer or a firearm?
 
Man-portable heavy-duty broad spectrum cellphone jammers are an extremely rare piece of equipment that use specialized batteries not commonly available in stores. Even onsold at ten cents to the Rand, how many starving Soweto niggers do you think could front R35,000 for one of these?
To put it another way, if you’re a kaffir out to maak die boer dood and you have money and black market access, are you going to buy a jammer or a firearm?
I’m not aware on the specifics of this piece of equipment so I’ll have to take your word on it.
Another thing that I sometimes suspect is that the reason why these people are so well organised and armed is because this is a South African deep state/mafia operation. A lot of farmland just so happens to be over sites where mines would be viable if it weren’t owned already. Mining after all, is one of the primary sectors which the new black elite uses to enrich itself. So what you’ve got is basically a group of dirt poor EFF supporters who think that if they kill whitey they will become big land owners, and their rich well connected patrons in the ANC who really stand to gain. But at the end of the day, most of these killings as far as I can tell don’t occur with high tech military equipment. So make of that what you will.
Cyril Ramaphosa is an interesting case here because he’s been connected to big business in South Africa since the 80s. He was on the board of directors for Glencore and is one of the richest men in the country. He is the very picture of the ANC patronage network beneficiary.
 
In "die goei ou dae", the localized slur was "Hoggenheimer", after a sleazy Randlord-type character in a comic play.
Deep cut. I think it was Die Burger newspaper that popularised it.
i found some images. It was easier to find with an Afrikaans google search
IMG_3693.webp
IMG_3692.webp
IMG_3694.webp
IMG_3695.webp
IMG_3696.webp

Note for our foreign friends: Hogenheimer was basically a figure representing both Anglo and Jewish finance. The reason why those two groups were linked in the perception of the Afrikaner is complicated but basically it has a lot to do with gold.
 
Last edited:
Like Jewish leaders in the United States and elsewhere, Goldstein finds himself walking a tightrope when it comes to a US president whose pro-Israel and philosemitic rhetoric is often matched by policies that many Jews oppose. Some American Jews have welcomed the attention the administration has paid to campus antisemitism, for example, but many have worried that his attack on universities has been too harsh, blunt and undemocratic.
Look at what they describe as a "tightrope". They like that the administration is cracking down on antisemitism, but worry that it may also crack down on antiwhiteness.
In a situation where the jew has to choose between two options -- one which is beneficial towards everyone, jews included, and one which is neutral for jews but negative for whites -- the jew will choose the outcome which harms whites over the outcome which helps jews. It's like they just can't help themselves. Such an unpleasant people. Maybe Hitler was on to something!
 
In a situation where the jew has to choose between two options -- one which is beneficial towards everyone, jews included, and one which is neutral for jews but negative for whites -- the jew will choose the outcome which harms whites over the outcome which helps jews. It's like they just can't help themselves. Such an unpleasant people. Maybe Hitler was on to something!
To be fair, this is not a phenomenon restricted to Jews.

I recall a story that illustrates how if people were given 50,000 when others were given more, they wouldn't take it. They would however take 20,000 if others get less. A lot of people really do just want to be richer than their competitors, even if everyone ends up poorer.
 
It would probably be antisemitism if I said then I won't cry if and when that chief rabbi will be beaten up by a random black guy.
Note for our foreign friends: Hogenheimer was basically a figure representing both Anglo and Jewish finance. The reason why those two groups were linked in the perception of the Afrikaner is complicated but basically it has a lot to do with gold.
I guess Hogenheimer would be an alternative meme to the Happy Merchant.
 
Back