Watermark Discussion. - NIGGER MARK N SHIEEET.

[PixarsTedKennedy]

shut up nigger

I'm not your nigger, kike.

 

[ASeabear8952]

I think niggamark is way too extreme (but still funny). If we are going in this direction I think we should use kiwimark. I’m thinking either the url in the corner or the entire logo in the corner, like I’ve seen some people do in the past. That way if YouTubers use clips from here even if they blur it out we’d know they’d taken them from here.

 

[A Deer In Headlights]

Maybe not niggermarking specifically, but I do think it's a good idea to promote ways users can control the work they've done for the farms and how they want to distribute it.

Like for example if it's something that the person who's the subject of interest is trying to actively suppress or doesn't want people to remember then maybe you wouldn't want an offensive watermark. That way people will be more willing to have open discussions about across the Internet and spread awareness.

Whereas on the other hand if it's something stupid like a clip of Bossmanjack sperging out because he lost all his money for the 4,698th time then it doesn't matter if there's a watermark or not. In fact it may be even better if there is a watermark because if people outside of the farms really cared then they would make the effort to research for themselves. The fact that only one person clipped the moment that Bossman got arrested only proves this point.

I don't think it should be a site-wide policy, but there definitely should be a disclaimer about the risk of content being stolen from the farms and a thread on how to deter outsiders from stealing

 

[KingPenguin120]

This is a wonderful idea that would allow for a LOT of creative expression. Please allow me to contribute in the one way that I can.

View attachment 7405563

It's beautiful.

 

[Step out of the car sir]

The reketia body cam footage needs that kind of water mark on it, nigger water-marking is high class bait for YouTube vultures so it’s a win win.

Maybe two separate dvd bouncing watermark that says nigger and faggot, that might be ideal, going to try it in Sony Vegas later.

 

[ASeabear8952]

Maybe not niggermarking specifically, but I do think it's a good idea to promote ways users can control the work they've done for the farms and how they want to distribute it.

Like for example if it's something that the person who's the subject of interest is trying to actively suppress or doesn't want people to remember then maybe you wouldn't want an offensive watermark. That way people will be more willing to have open discussions about across the Internet and spread awareness.

Whereas on the other hand if it's something stupid like a clip of Bossmanjack sperging out because he lost all his money for the 4,698th time then it doesn't matter if there's a watermark or not. In fact it may be even better if there is a watermark because if people outside of the farms really cared then they would make the effort to research for themselves. The fact that only one person clipped the moment that Bossman got arrested only proves this point.

I don't think it should be a site-wide policy, but there definitely should be a disclaimer about the risk of content being stolen from the farms and a thread on how to deter outsiders from stealing

I’m all for this.

 

[dick brain]

Re: niggermark vs kiwifarms watermark,

As I understand it, the point of this is to stop react faggots from lazily turning kiwifarms threads into youtube videos wholesale and profiting off of what's documented here without attribution, correct?

While both a niggermark and a traditional watermark would combat this, they have very different outcomes.

A traditional watermark would force youtube react faggots to acknowledge the existence of kiwifarms and in doing so publicize it to their viewerbase, which accomplishes the goal of attribution but carries the risk of driving low quality goyslop consoomer traffic to the site. I don't want that.

A niggermark, on the other hand, disincentivizes faggot retard goyslop churning influencers from harvesting kiwifarms threads wholehog in the first place, dissuades them from making their gay little videos at all, preventing both their profiteering bullshit gay retard grift, but also not putting the site on blast for every gay little retard on youtube and instagram to come shit up.

Maybe Josh or someone else can weigh in on this but I don't see much good coming from a high-quantity influx of low-quality users. Most people don't belong here, least of all the type of bottomfeeders who watch moistcritical or wavywebsurf or whatever.

 

[Logitech F310 Gamepad]

you could use a displacement mask:

View attachment 7405456

an animated DVD logo bounce overlay

these two combined is a pretty good idea, but please make it say "KiwiFarms".
Or maybe just "KF", but it might be too obscure or too sanitized for normies to identify.

If the watermark directs people to the forum, we at least get some credit and public recognition
"NIGGER" is funny, but it doesn't help the forum in the long term at all.

if the clippers see a niggermarked clip with the "no no word" they wont even bother
BUT
it they only see a "kiwifarms" watermark, since its not a nono word and advertisers wont get mad, they might bite the bullet and passively advertise the site.

 

[five of em]

I said this in the other thread but i think it is worth repeating here, does anyone a little more computer literate than me know if it’s possible to make this an option when uploading, like a box that you tick that would add it automatically?

 

[Dance For Us]

As amusing as the funny haha nigger word is, I think forcing people to acknowledge kiwifarms is better.
Having the kiwifarms loggo plastered all over it with the website link would be great.

It's a double edged sword of course. If everything is kiwi logo'd, the site will indeed get an influx of future pink triangles, but still get recognition. It's either you go out all out or just plaster nigger on everything and get nothing. It also wouldn't help those that genuinely write decent articles about the farms or do credit the site. So honestly, damned if you do, damned if you don't.

 

[dick brain]

if the clippers see a niggermarked clip with the "no no word" they wont even bother
BUT
it they only see a "kiwifarms" watermark, since its not a nono word and advertisers wont get mad, they might bite the bullet and passively advertise the site.

Can you explain to me why you think advertising the site to the type of people who watch youtubers who say things like "her prostate" and "commit sewerslide" is a good thing?

This is not rhetorical or a dunk or anything, I want to know the reasoning.

 

[Probably An Autist]

I didn't notice this thread, so here's my batch script for automatic overlaying

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/austin...les-austin_07-irondollah.170347/post-21514441

Strictly speaking it will work with any gif, just rename it nigger. it works on the assumption its a 2 second loop though.

 

[Spaced Outside Cargo]

I already posted this in the BMJ thread but clippers can also consider mastering the art of “Stealth Nigger Posting” since it would cause paranoia among people coming here to rip videos that their reaction will get taken down.

Stealth Nigger Posting:

A user includes the word Nigger or a similarly banned phrase in such a way that it bypasses the Automod.

What you guys are doing right now is “Overt Nigger Posting”:

Overt Nigger Posting:

Brute Forcing the Automod.

 

[Coon Cheese]

Re: niggermark vs kiwifarms watermark,

As I understand it, the point of this is to stop react faggots from lazily turning kiwifarms threads into youtube videos wholesale and profiting off of what's documented here without attribution, correct?

While both a niggermark and a traditional watermark would combat this, they have very different outcomes.

A traditional watermark would force youtube react faggots to acknowledge the existence of kiwifarms and in doing so publicize it to their viewerbase, which accomplishes the goal of attribution but carries the risk of driving low quality goyslop consoomer traffic to the site. I don't want that.

A niggermark, on the other hand, disincentivizes faggot retard goyslop churning influencers from harvesting kiwifarms threads wholehog in the first place, dissuades them from making their gay little videos at all, preventing both their profiteering bullshit gay retard grift, but also not putting the site on blast for every gay little retard on youtube and instagram to come shit up.

Maybe Josh or someone else can weigh in on this but I don't see much good coming from a high-quantity influx of low-quality users. Most people don't belong here, least of all the type of bottomfeeders who watch moistcritical or wavywebsurf or whatever.

We should use a nigger mark, its the most sensible option. i can't stand those spineless slop channels that churn out lolcow content but would never ever ever use the word retard or nigger. shamless grifters get the rope.

these two combined is a pretty good idea, but please make it say "KiwiFarms".
Or maybe just "KF", but it might be too obscure or too sanitized for normies to identify.

If the watermark directs people to the forum, we at least get some credit and public recognition
"NIGGER" is funny, but it doesn't help the forum in the long term at all.

if the clippers see a niggermarked clip with the "no no word" they wont even bother
BUT
it they only see a "kiwifarms" watermark, since its not a nono word and advertisers wont get mad, they might bite the bullet and passively advertise the site.

shut up nigger

 

[mister fireworks]

an animated dvd logo bounce overlay that says NIGGER would be the funniest option and would most organically drive suitable proto kiwis to the site. i see videos with watermarks all the time and just kind of tune them out and forget what they say. the bouncing nigger logo would pique my interest and would also drive discussions about the farms in places where linking to it is verboten.

 

[Ghostse]

This exactly.
Instead of putting nigger, why not just put the website URL? Instead of preventing people from using the footage at all, would it not be better to get the site name out there and expose the wholesome chungus 100 creators as users of the vile farms to the point that it becomes normalized and not so much of a scarlet letter?

Maybe I'm being naïve, but it seems like a better measure.

1) Do we really want a bunch of mouth-breathing 'youtube clip commentarians' coming to this site?
2) It is significantly less hilarious. It woul only be better if we could put the watermark into something human eyes can't see but youtube's slur-detecting AI could and thus we could troll these theiving retards.

 

[PunkinMan]

Anyone who adds a useful resource or example is getting added to the OP, I'll see how many I can fit till I run out of room.

 

[Steve Pinto]

just use whatever image makes sense for the context. no point in arguing about what "we" use. a script with configurable images that anyone can use to watermark without having to open a full video editor is ideal. the actual implementation is probably a afternoon project, but idiot proofing it for all kiwis is a little bit of work. i'll see if i can take a stab at it over the week

edit: for those who are recording on OBS anyways, adding a moving transparent overlay while recording or rerecording is very easy to do.

 

[dick brain]

an animated dvd logo bounce overlay that says NIGGER would be the funniest option and would most organically drive suitable proto kiwis to the site. i see videos with watermarks all the time and just kind of tune them out and forget what they say. the bouncing nigger logo would pique my interest and would also drive discussions about the farms in places where linking to it is verboten.

I searched for a sony vegas template for about five minutes but couldn't find one and I'm too lazy to animate the paths myself, but if somebody else makes one against a solid background it would be trivial to drop it into a timeline and chroma key the background, and/or use it as a displacement map if desired.

There's apparently an OBS plugin/template/whatever for it if anybody wants to do the work for me. Could use the png someone provided earlier or just text.

Continuing my pro-niggermark tirade, I think that videos that can't or won't discuss these topics properly do not deserve to exist. Self-censorship incentivized by profit is still censorship, if you're not willing to call a tranny a tranny, even as a quote/citation, or even say the word suicide you shouldn't be making a video that covers those topics. If a platform does not want that content to exist, that platform should not profit off of that content in a censored/doctored form. I would much rather the videos not be made at all than have kiwifarms properly attributed in a dogshit neutered video made by a faggot cuck who licks stinkditch for ad revenue.

It's an extension of this concept:



If someone uploads a video using a clip that says nigger, I know they're doing it for the love of the game.

 

[TV's Adam West]

gonna niggermark nova videos

this but ACTUALLY, SmokeyMC and Kiwi Tapes are fucking reddit scum