Watermark Discussion. - NIGGER MARK N SHIEEET.

[Probably An Autist]

I haven't had any issues with it so I dunno. You can always add the loop back in if it does start fucking up for you I guess.

With my script, -1 basically causes ffmpeg to chimp out and render an infinitely looping nigger overlay which never stops rendering,

 

[HexFag]

Somebody with more talent than I should make a nigger watermark similar to nico nico douga's chat scroll function. Call it nigger nigger douga or some shit like that.

 

[Casshern]

Do we really want to give ammo to those trying to shut us down? I feel like nigger won't end well for Josh.

Out of everything putting nigger on some videos will not hurt him anymore than he already has been you dumb nigger

This is a wonderful idea that would allow for a LOT of creative expression. Please allow me to contribute in the one way that I can.

View attachment 7405563

Seriously, this is peak watermark right here, although I’ve had an idea that I think could make this a good moneymaking opportunity:

If Null wants to, we could have site-enforced niggermarks on certain threads, maybe even customize them per cow (they must still contain nigger). And, offer payment for a JewTube-friendly alternative: an equally annoying KiwiFarms watermark, with a Null wiggler and a static url and logo. Forcing them to pay us to advertise us.

I think a lot of people in this thread are giving a lot of undue credit to clip channels and their audience.
I hope i’ll be proven wrong, but forcing them to acknowledge that they get their stuff from KF won’t magically change their perception of the site.
In the same breath the channels will label this as a “doxxing site” and the viewers will continue to view this place as some kind of LiveLeak-type site, and no one was jumping to save LiveLeak when it closed.

Changing perception? Who gives a shit about that? It’s just funny to fuck over low IQ grifters like @The Pickle with Power Words

 

[ForTheHoard]

Kiwimark for political, happenings, etc. anything that might be used by journalists.

Niggermark for cows, drama, etc. anything that wouldn't be featured on the news.

I would also consider a possible carve out for the beauty parlor. Let them come up with their own mark.

 

[Breadbassket]

Changing perception? Who gives a shit about that? It’s just funny to fuck over low IQ grifters like @The Pickle with Power Words

The "perception" for many of them already is that Kiwi Farms is a site to rip content and clips from while rarely if ever giving credit all the while they monetize everything, promote sponsors and often beg for people to give money to their Patreon. A watermark that says "nigger" isn't the end of the world.

 

[WhoDaresWhoCaresWhoKnows]

I think a lot of people in this thread are giving a lot of undue credit to clip channels and their audience.
I hope i’ll be proven wrong, but forcing them to acknowledge that they get their stuff from KF won’t magically change their perception of the site.
In the same breath the channels will label this as a “doxxing site” and the viewers will continue to view this place as some kind of LiveLeak-type site, and no one was jumping to save LiveLeak when it closed.

It is not about changing the view of the content creators themselves, but rather changing their viewers perception of them. Something along the lines of:
''They always say Kiwi Farms is leading to murdering the poor trans people and helpless blacks why would they get their clips from there?''
People who are not completely braindead will at least see the hypocrisy in that, which is a first step to changing their understanding of the site.

This would also in at least some cases even lead to their audience, despite their pre-programmed hatred for Kiwi Farms checking if their now suspicious content creator has a thread, and that is a snowball rolling down a mountain when it gets going because a fair amount of them do and are far from being as clean as they pretend to be.

For when it comes to their audience it would be about drawing in what few people who are actually open to changing their minds when presented with evidence and also inviting retard rage from wokesters who either still think creatures like Keffals managed to kill the site, or are not even aware it is a normal site available on the Clearnet which further would spread the name.

 

[Didnt Use Real Email Once]

I think a very faint watermark will be more effective, imagine the outrage after someone notices a faint kiwiniggermark in a 100k-1m view video. Make the sloppers suffer or stop caring about retards worried about their sources, don't just scare them away with an obnoxious watermark. Not to mention a fainter mark makes it easier to ignore for site users. There's the issue of a fainter mark being lost to repeated compression earlier, but that's probably a better thing overall as more serious content would be more widely copied and reuploaded elsewhere. It would even make any cows raging about the source being KF look even more schizo.

Also, if you really want to assrape editors you need two passes (or maybe ffmpeg can do it in one pass IDK) a motion element and a static element. Easy enough to hide a motion mark during static content for a screenshot to talk over.

 

[SpellforceFan]

I would also consider a possible carve out for the beauty parlor. Let them come up with their own mark.

It's still a "nigger", but it's pink and has a heart emoji on both sides.

I think a very faint watermark will be more effective

Compression would get rid of faint watermarks. Or you could parse it through AI watermark removal, and then compress it to get rid of any traces. It also can't be hidden from a design perspective - clipping channels can't use an excuse "oh I just didn't see it tee hee~", they have to be forced to acknowledge it, to apologize for featuring it, to debase themselves.

 

[Cheesy Beavy]

View attachment 7405992

ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -i TEST.png -filter_complex "[1:v]format=rgba[logo];[0:v][logo]overlay=x='abs(mod(t*300,2*(W-w))-(W-w))':y='abs(mod(t*300,2*(H-h))-(H-h))'" -c:v libx264 -crf 18 -preset veryfast -pix_fmt yuv420p output.mp4

Spoiler: image

View attachment 7406000

Thank you so much for this. I've made two test videos to see how this would work with the nigger/kiwifarms gif at different resolutions, thoughts? (yes this can be sped up)


View attachment 7406121

View attachment 7406124

 

[Probably An Autist]

Been playing around with different gifs. I for one say why stop with one watermark when you can use ALL of them?

(yes yes reencoding is bad for quality blah blah)

 

[the rat]

Been playing around with different gifs. I for one say why stop with one watermark when you can use ALL of them?

View attachment 7406656
(yes yes reencoding is bad for quality blah blah)

I wish we could have file downloads redirect to this.

 

[SpellforceFan]

infinitely looping nigger

The horror!

 

[Probably An Autist]

Just had a thought

What about niggermarking the audio?

Like have it play keemstar saying nigger at low volume at points in the video or some shit

 

[gildersleeve]

I much rather support the kiwimark over the niggermark. Symbol with the website address. Gives credit and draws attention. Unable to be removed.

 

[blackface enthusiast]

I hope i’ll be proven wrong, but forcing them to acknowledge that they get their stuff from KF won’t magically change their perception of the site.

Again it's not about changing perceptions or advertising the site or anything, it's just about the users of the site and the staff getting their fair due and credit for finding/clipping this information. As it stands it's too easy for sloptubers to browse the highlights of a thread and take content clipped and edited by Farms users and slap that in a video for easy revenue. It doesn't stop it entirely (barring niggermarking) but at least a KF watermark provides some form of credit to the users who created the clips and the staff who tirelessly work (for free!) to keep the site afloat and functioning.

 

[SpellforceFan]

Just had a thought

What about niggermarking the audio?

Like have it play keemstar saying nigger at low volume at points in the video or some shit

Too easy to hide by muting or distorting it. AI is incredibly efficient at manipulating audio, and people rely on their sight the most anyway, so they'll overlook dodgy audio.

 

[Probably An Autist]

Just had a thought

What about niggermarking the audio?

Like have it play keemstar saying nigger at low volume at points in the video or some shit

Too easy to hide by muting or distorting it. AI is incredibly efficient at manipulating audio, and people rely on their sight the most anyway, so they'll overlook dodgy audio.

Too late

Bossman Post in thread 'Austin Curtis Peterson / BossmanJack / AustinGambles / Austin_07 / irondollah'

May 24, 2025

Are audio-based NIGGERMARKs out of the question?

God I hope not.

Too late i got it to work

We're at peak nigger guys. Audio niggerer attached. Code below incase you don't trust zips. VERY straightforward.

ffmpeg -hwaccel auto -i "%~1" -stream_loop -1 -i nigger.mp3 -shortest -filter_complex amerge=inputs=2 -ac 2 -c:v libx264 -pix_fmt yuv420p -profile:v baseline -level 3.0 -crf 22 -preset medium -c:a aac -strict experimental -movflags +faststart -threads 0 "%~n1_audionigger.mp4"

• Probably An Autist

• 
• 
• 

it's maskable sure but still funny if you do it alongside a watermark.

 

[SpellforceFan]

Too late

It's more of a "streamer rekt" thread material than a proper niggermark, but hearing "NIGGER" will never be not amusing.

 

[trash cat]

What is the best way to superimpose a good nigger mark on an MP4 using ffmpeg?

Something hard to remove but that won't totally destroy the watchability of a clip

overlay this @ like 3-5% transparency

View attachment 7405145

ffmpeg -i "inputvideo.mp4" -stream_loop -1 -i "nigger.gif" -filter_complex "[1:v]format=rgba,colorchannelmixer=aa=0.03[ov];[0:v][ov]overlay=0:0" -shortest -c:a copy  "niggerfied.mp4"

change the aa=0.03 to whatever percent of transparency you would like

Example output:
View attachment 7405200

Thanks for sharing that excellent ffmpeg suggestion

I'm sure it works great on a laptop in windows or Linux but it doesn't seem to work using ffmpeg on Android.

I'm not sure what the issue is exactly. The normal ffmpeg timestamp extraction sub-command doesn't work properly and it just keeps encoding forever and doesn't stop where told

ffmpeg -hwaccel auto -y -ss 00:00:00 -to 00:00:30 -i "/storage/emulated/0/Download/rs1.mp4" -stream_loop -1 -i "/storage/emulated/0/Download/nigger.jpg" -filter_complex "[1:v]format=rgba,colorchannelmixer=aa=0.03[ov];[0:v][ov]overlay=0:0" -shortest -c:a copy  "/storage/emulated/0/Download/rs1_1.mp4"

On another video I tried (without timestamp extraction) the simpler original command ran to completion and successfully reencoded the video, but didn't have any effect (no nigger mark)

 ffmpeg -hwaccel auto -y -i "/storage/emulated/0/Download/hitler1.mp4" -stream_loop -1 -i "/storage/emulated/0/Download/nigger.gif" -filter_complex "[1:v]format=rgba,colorchannelmixer=aa=0.03[ov];[0:v][ov]overlay=0:0" -shortest -c:a copy  "/storage/emulated/0/Download/hitler1a.mp4"

Now this video was in portrait mode which I'm not sure if was the source of the problem.

I tried with the saved awesome scrolling image as both a gif and a jpg and it doesn't seem to make a difference.

I'm guessing it's probably the limited implementation of ffmpeg on Android; it might be missing some libraries or something.

I might have to come up with a simpler command to make nigger marks using ffmpeg on Android.

Any suggestions welcome and I'll post my results here if I get something working. Godspeed frens!

 

[Chromeo]

When I was a kid, there was a TV channel that had these diagonal lines of shifting colors that rolled down the screen. Like a black and white set of lines with rainbow colors imposed over it that slowly shifted over a minute or so. Could do something similar, have the N word diagonal and slowly move down the screen so tiny it's almost like a texture