- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
Kayla presumably has other in-laws; i.e., siblings' spouses and the spouses' parents, etc. Given Kayla's family is local, it is theoretically possible. And if that had been the truth, that would indeed have been interesting. Nick's parents hosting April was entirely expected (at least to me, and I could swear it's been discussed or at least theorized).Respectfully, I don't understand the confusion here. This is the second comment on the issue. My comment:
"Kayla's in-laws housed April"
That's OBVIOUSLY Bob and Celeste who are Kayla's IN-LAWS. How is my statement inaccurate? It's Bob and Celeste's home in Eagle Rock. Anyone paying attention knows that.
Are you thinking I said "Nick's in-laws housed April" ? I didn't. That would be Shari and Dan. They would never.
It would have been a lot clearer for people skimming through just to say Nick's parents.
That aside, it really does point up how complicit and shit his parents are. They enable Nick and arrange/ control people just like he tries to, moving them around like little pawns on a chessboard. Whether it was to help their son keep his mistress near, or to help him get her away from him when she became inconvenient to have around, it's clear April and Kayla are barely sentient* objects to them as well.
*(they're not wrong)