Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 22.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 29.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 39 13.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 94 33.5%

  • Total voters
    281
Nick is gonna be platinum mad lmao
Is it wise for Aaron to be allowing them to shit on Kayla on his channel?
I assume he could just say "I didn't know they'd do that". But Nick will use every angle of attack possible.
methinks "Kayla"(Nick) would have hard time proving Aaron's intent to get Geno to address a person he has restraining order from.
Although knowing Nick he is already creeping through phonelines to the Candy Yoshi PD about this, he loves to lose money in Courts and humiliating his whore wife publicly.
 
As time goes on I disagree with you and others on that. Nick displays a lot of abuser characteristics and I honestly believe he was told to stop teaching because Nick cannot handle being challenged. If Aaron is to be believed, and honestly he’s the only person who can keep a story fairly straight, then Nick is an abuser. The moments where Nick responds to his kids have him be increasingly short with them.

I think Nick has given himself enough brain damage that he’s lost inhibitions and is slowly just becoming a Gollum-esque monster. If you get between him and the object of his desire (cocaine, whisky, Minnesota mid-pussy, Aaron’s cum, Molly, or nitrous) then he’ll go nuts. If you challenge him he’ll start hurling abuse. Aaron says that he and Kayla have had shouting matches that devolve into throwing shit.
Correct. Or to put it another way: Everyone thought Chris-Chan was totally harmless until he wasn't.

We tend to think of people like Nick as cowards - he is one. We tend to think of cowards as harmless, but full blown cowards are the ones who hurt the most people for the shittiest of reasons because cowards are some of the most self-absorbed people on the planet.

Nick laughs at the PO catching him. He's already come up with some bullshit cope he thinks is some legal masterpiece for when he gets caught doing Whippets or Duster. Were he truly afraid of being arrested he would stop poking the beehive. But what has he done? Did he come back and have a serious, heartfelt conversation about what happened to him and how awful addiction is? Did he use his pull as a lawyer to encourage others to find help with their addictions? NOPE.

He went to therapy with his coke-fueld, golem-nosed god complex and said "Eww, I'm better than these losers" Before going off to slander everybody who's ever mildly inconvenienced him embarassing everyone through texts he's shared online. Nick is beyond redemption and I maintain he's extremely dangerous.
 
Among those:
  • Nick "couldn't" leave Kayla
  • Kayla was planning to divorce Nick (funny, the thread has mostly ignored this pretty huge revelation, probably out of sheer exhaustion)

I do not believe these were entirely impressive revelations as we knew (independently of Nick) about shouting rows between Nick and Kayla that pre-dated the Qover. Of course she would bring up 'divorce' and 'death/suicide' in an emotionally turbulent argument eventually.

I also think parsing of semantics for Nick is useless because he changes the meaning of words to suit his purpose.

  • Kayla knew Nick was "boning" April when she would leave the house with the kids

This was new and 100% in line with Nick's narcissist wanting to have two wives.

  • Kayla's in-laws housed April

I believe this is meant to be Nick's parents? Jusy phrased oddly... It makes sense because they would want to run cover for the Qover and their son's reputation. If anyone forced an NDA, it would be them.

  • The second Kayla said she still wanted the marriage to work, he dumped April (cue Nick's gratitude womb tattoo)

I am sure Nick's parents had a lot of input to this. I have no reason to doubt Nick's assertion that he was talking April up on the conditional that 'if Kayla left [him]' then he would make their arrangements more permanent. He was trying to hold on to both, but at least be sure he could retain one. When Kayla was willing to stay (in whatever capacity) I am sure Nick's parents jumped at the chance to take Kayla over April.

April was always Plan B given the turmoil of divorce scandal and the children.

Good video, as usual. The only thing I don't get is the whippets intro, since his voice is hardly ever low in the video, but almost entirely shrill and annoying. He's such a freak. Ick Wreckeita.

It can also cause weird modulation of tone. I hear it 8/10 when he starts speaking after coming back on screen.

They have a prenup right? I would assume that’s all included in there.

Nick will never get a divorce because he’s far too comfortable. His dream was to get to fuck someone on the side with permission so I think he’ll just fuck someone on the side without permission next. Probably already has.

No. He had a rant about how 'not lucky' he was because he didn't have one. It was archived by Elissa in later 2023, I believe, or early 2024.

god i wished trust were public

but very good point. also explains why they shat out kids, why he went to law school he wanted to learn how to find a loop hole.

I wonder if it is not a monthly pay-out trust, but rather tight financial apron strings where his parents just dole out money. They could buy the first house and put it in Nick's name with verbal conditions on it. They could also set up trusts for the second (current home) property with non-public conditions.

I think that would be the funniest option because then there is really no way for Nick to weasel more money until he inherits something.

What if April has signed an NDA, and that is why Nick was trying so hard to find out when Kiki last spoke to her?

As others have said, these seem to be highly unenforceable in the US when sexual relations are a factor. I also believe that if anyone insisted on an NDA (besides the one Nick stupidly wanted at the Qover inception that the Imholte's refused) it came from Nick's parents as condition for housing and feeding April.
 
What if April has signed an NDA, and that is why Nick was trying so hard to find out when Kiki last spoke to her?
It would be worthless, NDAs cannot be binding when an employer commits sexual abuse.


Nick has stated publicly she was his childrens Nanny. He told the cops on bodycam she was the Nanny. He has publicly stated the amount of money Chaney was making as the Nanny. He has publicly stated, many times, that he was having an intimate relationship with that nanny.

The reason congress passed this law is because NDAs suppressed the ability of the abused party to discuss their abuse with friends, family and even doctors.

I 100% agree it sounds like Nick was asking for specific dates because they likely had her sign the NDA, gave her a lump sum of thousands as muzzle. Her texting Keanu that she was being abused would get whatever NDA she signed thrown out on sight, trying to prevent her from reaching out to friends as a way to heal after trauma with an employer is the exact circumstance the law is supposed to mitigate.

I bet Nick knows this, since I've posted almost the exact same comment before and Nick watches the thread like a navy seal on recon, but his magical thinking probably has an out for him as "she wasnt my employee since;"

>I never paid her
Which would be illegal
>I paid her in drugs
Which would be illegal
>I only paid her in cash, no paper trail
Which would be illegal.

Nick probably assumes he has an out, because he learned nothing from the Montagraph lawsuit and severely overestimated his familiarity with the law, especially torte law.
 
View attachment 7413533
Keanu using an overlay of Balldo's face to talk as him, it's so fucking stupid but it made me lol.
This bit had me rolling lol. Super zoomed in because the TWA video was taking up most of the screen.

 
I had to go back and watch some more Keanu vids for background on her and it's actually astonishing to me that this mediocre nontent streamer with a sub-100 IQ just sat down and easily won a intellectual sparring session with the greatest pedophile minds of the dabbleverse and reduced a very smart special boy into a bright red ragetwig.
 
Yes, but I’d rather Null watermark it so the farms gets credit than have EWU and over other YouTube channel profiting off of the fruits of our collective labor and our collective crowdfunding.
I propose:
Transparent “The Kiwi Farms” text center
News hamster bottom left
Kiwi logo top left
Ceiling cat top right
Candy Yoshi bottom right ((R) Midnight Energy Drink)

IMG_0551.webp
 
With the news of the Qover October Quandry, this Facebook comment by pious and based Father-in-Law Dan Sletta proves quite interesting.
1748271138498.webp
On October 21st, He explicitly wishes for someone in her life to "...save you [Kayla] from perversion(verbal/physical molesation)..."

He then edits this post minutes later to retract the molestation. Luckily, a wise Kiwifarmer checked the edit history.
Did he actively encourage Kayla to leave Nick to his hedonistic squalor? Maybe Nick's abuse was too much for the sanctity of marriage to bear?
And the specificity on verbal / physical molestation...Did Nick scream at his wife like he did to Keanu? Did he domestically abuse her? Physical assault?
 
Thank you. It seems I underestimated Meme Copium.
Meme has demonstrated good video editing skills.

Though I think @Third World Aristocrat and @Shush have delivered the best thus far.

No. He had a rant about how 'not lucky' he was because he didn't have one. It was archived by Elissa in later 2023, I believe, or early 2024.
Correct. They don't have one. And that's why I think Nick hasn't filed for divorce himself. Not even to be with April.

He has much to lose in such a divorce. She would probably rape him.
 
I think the most interesting thing about that debate - the most revealing thing is that of all people, Attention whore April was the one who just said "fuck it, I'm done. leave it in the past," and just dropped it. Now she only really comes up incidentally. There's no real news on her and we don't care either.

Meanwhile Nick is out here non-stop seething like a googly-eyed monster on 80% playback speed. The difference is night and day. Nick SHOULD just drop this nasty chapter of his life but he won't, and it's entirely his fault.

I think Keanu was too nice. The second that guy said "Well my friend doesn't share nudes" My instant thought was... "yeah he just shares creepshots of some dudes 6 year old and sings about jerking it off to kids." The "You have a wife you weirdo" was perfect though. I also love how the pedophile when challenged about anything resorts to redditor speak "muh ad hominem" Like this is some structured academic debate as Nick calls her a Dumb bitch every 2 seconds to assert his flaccid small-peen dominance over the womenfolk. Redditors are just fucking pedos aren't they?
 
For the sake of this woman not going on a killing spree with her bow and firearms
You know what, there's one positive thing we can say about April in comparison to skelly. She can actually hunt animals fairly and give them a dignified end. Nick only knows how to torture trapped critters to a slow and humiliating death. Justice for the fart squirrels and Scrombles the raccoon.
 
>Fucking women not your wife is wrong
:really: what if I fucked yours?
>Yes that's wrong
:really: let me let me

This whole 'You'd be scared to introduce me to your wife because she'd want to fuck me instead of you' line is utterly ridiculous.

Dude, I don't have ANY women in my life who'd be impressed by a man in his forties who can't support himself. Who has a wife and five kids and is still living off his parents money.

I certainly wouldn't be marrying such a woman.

Sure, I know there are skanks on the internet who flock to celebrity and cocaine like flies around shit. Perhaps some of them would even bang you -- shit, if KingCobra can get laid ANY online character can find someone who'll have sex with you.

Normal, grown-up women though? None of the women I've ever known would have anything to do with you. Even the kind of women who are into casual one off hookups wouldn't find Rekieta appealing. His body is pathetic, he isn't funny, his face looks like a ferret, he's not an intellectual powerhouse -- he's really got nothing going for him at all, that I can see.

Perhaps I'm wrong? Because I was never a fan, I just don't see any appeal in him at all. Kiwi women? Does Rekieta have any attractive characteristics? Even if you don't find him attractive, do you have friends who would fall for his charms? What is it that the wine moms find so attractive? I always assumed it was the idea that they could flirt with what they thought was a successful, happily married man, but once that's all revealed to be a facade, is there anything left?
 
KNU origin story:

Geno and Keanu describe the pic of Kayla posing for Aaron (From STMS today)

OK I get it, everyone knows Nick's a lying liar who lies and all, but usually he at least tries to stay in a comfort zone of lies that are wrapped around some bare kernel of truth or that can be wiggled out of with "I never said that" pilpul, so why does he repeatedly double down on this one particular lie about the photo being originally taken without consent when every bit of available evidence proves the opposite and everyone knows it?

He can't plead ignorance because even assuming for argument's sake that he doesn't keep an eye on his thread enough to see that the actual video footage of the photo being taken has been here for over six weeks, at the very least he would have seen the actual video footage of the photo being taken having been on Stallyn19's channel for over six weeks given that he routinely comments on Stallyn19 clips generally. He had to have seen that footage by now, he had to have heard the countless descriptions from Keanu and Geno over the past year about the obviously camera-facing tits-forward photo that could only ever have been posed for, and now Geno's clip today couldn't have made that more clear by even re-enacting the exact pose for all to see, and yet Nick will still continue trying to spread the pure delusion that this was a creepshot taken entirely without Kayla's knowledge. Who the FUCK does he think he's even trying to fool other than himself?

At this point his continuing to cling to this fiction is getting too delusional to easily chalk it up to a mere attempt to make Aaron look worse and/or Nick being in denial about the notion that Kayla may have simply lied to him, and one has to wonder if maybe there's some other motivation, like if he perhaps had Kayla unequivocally commit to the creepshot story in her police report because, as Nick reiterated again on Friday, he believes that the creepshot itself would be an independent felony all its own irrespective of the later dissemination that led to the RP charge. If that is the case, then he would now have to stick to the creepshot story come hell or high water, for fear of Kayla facing actual legal exposure for a false statement in a police report. There would be no other sane reason for him to not simply take the L on this relatively minor point.
 
Last edited:
Back