US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TIL that Marvel hates criticism of Israel.

View attachment 7420683
That was 1 or 2 firmware updates ago. Now Israel is a colonizer white empire (the literal devil) oppressing innocent brown people (saints). The only thing stopping them from going all "from the river to the sea" is the fact that they're connected enough to Hollywood that that won't fly and marvel comics are now all about vaguely ethic 30 something women doing their best sex in the city impressions.
 
TIL that Marvel hates criticism of Israel.

View attachment 7420683
Based. Sick of hearing about "muh settler colonialism" in sh!t that has nothing to do with Israel, Gaza, Jews, or Muslims. If "educated" Leftists want to openly hate on Jews & blame Jews for all the world's problems, than they need to grow a pair of balls and stop wrapping their antisemitic rhetoric around "those poor innocent starving Muslim victims". Muzzie children are constantly dying in dumbass wars (for example, the Syrian civil war) by the hundreds of thousands. Wars that are 99.9% of the time, started by other Muslims doing a durkadurka jihad 'cause Muslims (being practitioners of an ancient Moon worshipping death cult) don't value life the way Western Christians do.
 
In his book & articles, he discussed how cops & construction workers at ground zero looked down on the land pirates firefighters for brazenly looting from the rubble (which evidence suggests, likely took place before either tower even fell).
There have been counterarguments against this but at the same time a 9/11 survivor brought up the looting (around the 18 minute mark of a particular video) and there was an article put out about it only ten days after the catastrophe happened. Honestly it wouldn't shock me if there was some incidents of looting but I doubt it was on a major scale.
 
Last edited:
Thats the fucking lesson we havent learned since Korea
I didn't really follow the comment chain beyond this one
Every time I see this I simply point out that before every war people said that the American troops couldn't win anything.
Which is why the main point i was replying to was one you weren't really making to begin with, ie: the idea i see parrotted on /k/, /pol/, reddit, etc. that westerners are too soft to win wars.
you seem like you got a good head on your shoulders but dont have much real world experience.
I'm not going to risk saying anything on here that could get me discovered but i have experience with the type of thing you're talking about and i'm well aware of how this works
Its so far removed from a "skill issue" its not even funny, brother when the bullet comes at you or the 0.7 inch sized shrapnel piece at mach Jesus you wont care what color that hands that loosed it were.
And i'm also well aware that this
they just put the gun over the hill crest or around the corner and fired blind
Does not work beyond 20 meters. At all. It's no more realistic than tacticool highly trained navy seals 1v50ing an entire army with gun-kata in lone survivor. "skill issue" isn't everything but it absolutely makes a difference, or rather the muscle memory that you fall into when the pants shitting starts does.

I also disagree with this point...
You go into someone elses land, their fucking home the place where their children go to school and their wives maintain humble but worthwile homes, where their dead are buried and their very essence resides what the hell do you think they are going to do especially when you start shooting their countrymen?
...in the cases when the killing each other was going on long before we got there, ie: korea, vietnam, mogadishu, and so on.
Really fucking think about it guys, you have no idea how much I need you to. If China had regular army divisons in our country trying to kill liberals or some other easy to root against group under the guise of "saving the rest of us" you couldent fathom how quickly id be gunning to show them that only we get to bully little brother. Does that track for you? this isent an idle or obtuse metaphor its what we imposed and do impose on countless countrys under the thin thin veil of altruism.
Again, most of these places need stabilizing to begin with because they're already ripping each other's throats out. They don't have a concept of "countrymen" the way I would with some retarded sperg from portland... it's people who are already killing each other and frankly only exist in the same borders because of colonial history that didn't take into account their 2000 year old blood feud.

I also disagree with the greater premise of "they will never forgive you for killing their countrymen". Japan did, Germany did, Italy did, in fact even Vietnam did. Granted those were more official wars and with people who had functioning brains which is a key difference.

I know armchair generaling can leave out the on the ground reality of the situation and what we're doing to people, ours and theirs, trust me i fucking get your frustration there. But you also can't completely ignore the technical aspects of the situation. They're both real.

Having said all that I 100% agree with your overall point that if we're going to go deal with these places we need a clear easily achievable objective and it can't be to make animals stop behaving like animals.

It's also worth nothing: If it isn't clear I come here to fuck around. I don't ever outright lie but I engage in hyperbole and retarded shit because it's funny and this is one of the last places online i can do that. I don't actually think there's 0 chance some african with his sights turned up can never hit anything, but come on. It's fucking funny.
 
Last edited:
270-400 Jews died in 9/11. falling for brownoid tier conspiracy theories to own the magats
Yea but then you look at the gematria of 270 and 400 (and every number inbetween) and you can start to see some pretty damning stuff.

We're on to you.

An example of your tricks:
1000011506.webp
 
There have been counterarguments against this but at the same time a 9/11 survivor brought up the looting (around the 18 minute mark of a particular video) and there was an article put out about it only ten days after the catastrophe happened. Honestly it wouldn't shock me if there was some incidents of looting but I doubt it was on a major scale.
Why would Langewiesche lie about what he witnessed/what he heard (first hand) from interviews with ground zero workers? His career was severely damaged from his articles. Why would Langewiesche not recant his statements/apologize, if they were later proven to be mean rumors/not be true?

Firefighters are known as land pirates for a reason (i.e. they're notorious for stealing/looting from the scenes of fires).

Yea but then you look at the gematria of 270 and 400 (and every number inbetween) and you can start to see some pretty damning stuff.

We're on to you.

An example of your tricks:
View attachment 7420727

...did someone on this thread accidentally insult the glowies? Why is this thread being derailed by skitzo trolls? Can we go back to discussing actual American politics?

Do you guys think Trump actually wants to seize Canadian land/make Canada a US territory, or do you think he's baiting Canada for some yet to be known (but probably dumb) reason?
 
...did someone on this thread accidentally insult the glowies? Why is this thread being derailed by skitzo trolls? Can we go back to discussing actual American politics?

Do you guys think Trump actually wants to seize Canadian land/make Canada a US territory, or do you think he's baiting Canada for some yet to be known (but probably dumb) reason?
If you couldn't recognize that as parody, I don't know what to tell you, you're dumb.
 
That's actually the standard emergency protocol for high rise fires. Basically, people on levels not directly affected by the fire, are told to shelter in place shut the doors to prevent the smoke from spreading to their level/room. By sheltering in place, they give firefighters/first responders time to reach the flames and get the situation under control.
True. This brings me back to when a car spontaneously combusted in the parking garage of the 20-story building that I was living in at the time. I only knew something was wrong when my neighbors called me and asked where I was, as they had just gotten back only to see a swarm of fire trucks and emergency workers in front of the building, with heavy smoke coming out of the garage.

I had no idea that this was even going on. There was no smell of smoke indoors and no electrical disruptions. The fire alarm wasn’t going off in my unit, and I only started hearing it after reaching roughly the 5th floor while heading down in the stairwell. Apparently, there were no malfunctions in the alarm system- this was all by design.


747 planes loaded with enough jet fuel for an international flight
Nope. Flights 175 and 11 used the -200 variant of the 767, and both were bound for Los Angeles, with fuel capacities suitable for that journey (the 767 used for the AA flight was the -223ER [Extended Range], meaning that it could hold more fuel and handle transatlantic voyages under loosened ETOPS rules…so you could technically say that there was enough fuel for an international flight.).

Avgeek here, so I had to add that in. That being said…aren’t there dedicated threads for 9/11 sperging that all this could be moved to?
 
It seems that BladeRunna is going to vote as a Democrat with his fellow neet gooners... How will the Republicans recover from this?
By showcasing the Republican party's female assets - the Blonde Republican Sex kitten.

If Democrats are putting all their eggs in the "gooner demographic" basket, than maybe they should make sure their women aren't a bunch of overweight, dangerhaired uggos.
 
I don’t know how I feel about republicans wanting to go so hard on porn I feel that it’s a strategic misstep to go this hard this fast (I know some of you don’t care and want it now now now now.) but I think you need only to look at other vices such as smoking and drinking to see the effects of fast campaigns vs slow campaigns. Prohibition was an extremely fast way to remove alcohol from the market at a time when the total consumption population was high it’s ban was short lived and highly ineffective allowing many people to profit off it and form illicit industries around it. Smoking on the other hand was a battle of a thousand cuts the slowly saw smokers become more and more pushed to the edge of society and associated with only lowly trash and half dead corpses in nursing homes. The most effective way to destroy the reach of a popular vice is to slowly pressure its users in ways that both make it harder to do and more unappealing to get into. Cut an addict off in the hight of his addiction and it won’t matter how hard it is to obtain his drug he will do anything to get it. This isn’t to say don’t act but boiling the frog seems to work compared to throwing a fire bomb into a window.
 
Back