She almost certainly doesn't, but she almost certainly does have the power to do that, or at least the power to veto anything anyone wants to do with her IP. She didn't sign it away like a fool like so many creators do and had the clout to hold onto it.
No. That has been the Left's undoing, and I don't wish to go any farther down that road. I disagree with Rowling on many things, but she is very right on one very important issue, and the fact that she is so far left on most others makes her a very powerful advocate for this issue. I would not vote for her if she ran for office but I would gladly buy her a pint.
Hermione: Nigardium Melaniosa!
Honestly I think it's the Dahl observation from The Twits all over again. Those nasty thoughts are warping his exterior.
FWIW Clive Barker's ex-husband accused him in a court filing of hosting drug-fuelled underage BDSM orgies in their home.
It would be, except that you lot show up every few pages to remind everyone that this isn't the case. Rowling has this (dare I say) magical ability to piss certain men off, whether those men are wearing skirts or not. It just so happens that the skirt-wearing ones are the loudest at this particular moment, though you insist on competing with them.
What a bizarre thing to say. He's married to an attractive, intelligent, witty, talented woman who speaks her mind and who is worth nearly a billion dollars, and who has repeatedly made clear her love for him. That's not a position I would consider pitiful or pitiable. Of course from your posts, it's pretty clear you would pity any man who is in a relationship with a woman [and we could end the sentence right there, but to be sure, we'll add some qualifiers], especially a woman who is attractive, intelligent, witty, talented, and most especially a woman who speaks her mind (especially when she dares to disagree with Gandhi's Left Hook), and a woman who has enough money not to put up with bullshit or abusiveness from the man in her life.
IIRC he's also fairly wealthy himself, being a senior anaesthetist. They earn serious money, even in the NHS.
How does she hate men?
It's interesting to me how they betray their own sexism (again and again with Rowling), by showing their internalized belief that a woman can't come to her own opinions... That the fact she might talk with her DOCTOR husband on stuff related to the field of medicine, is somehow evidence that he is in control of her. A partnership wherein you support one another is foreign to these people.
I think what he meant is that women are blind to "mens' true characters," meaning the characters of individual men, not "men's true character" as a whole. In other words, there are good strong men, and bad abusive men, and if a young woman can't tell the difference between them before getting married then she deserves to be beaten, I guess.
Yes but don't tell them that.
Alright boys, what's your over-under on one, two, or all three of them trooning out when the time comes to really twist the knife?
Honestly, with how negatively mentally deranged transexuals were still viewed in 1995 I think it would be fairly easy to pick them out of a lineup.
I thought it was mudblood not mudskin
They can't contemplate a wealthy woman who doesn't need a man to "enable" her because to these freaks, being a woman is "skirt go spinny" and jacking off in the mirror.
I love how she’s not censoring their names anymore.
