Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 110 24.0%

  • Total voters
    458
1748461857887.webp

Gotta hand it to Russhole - attaching an email exhibit showing his presence explicitly wasn't required at the Council Meeting is a ballsy move, even for him!
 
Gotta love how every twist and turn in this litigation is flavored by Greer's constant attempts at obstructing the ability of others to criticize him. Lawsuits and their contents are public for plenty reasons, including transparency, and commenting on his conduct in the litigation is Constitutionally protected. Yet, all the maneuvers he's undertaking are to either conceal his behavior so that others can't comment on it, or ultimately destroy the avenues by which people may comment on it.

"Don't release those public records because people will comment on them and I find those comments unfavorable! Remove the ability for people to comment on me, or else I'll impede upon your life with frivolous criminal charges!" Moreover, he wants to punish anyone in his way, no matter how law-abiding they may be. Did you send public records in accordance with the law? You get threatened by Russel. It's remarkably consistent.

It's one thing to throw in the court's face some journo-slop opinion piece labelling the website "stalkers." That's not going to be so palatable a narrative when you're the only one lashing out in the confines of the litigation itself.
 
The crazy train has no brakes.
I believe that's why the Ozzman said they were going off the rails. Surely, if the Crazy Train had brakes, there would be no issues in terms of keeping it on the tracks. Even at top speeds you could still break the train and keep it ON the rails.

If you're wondering

Yes, I do have autism.


sup-girl-eyebrows.gif
 
Im struggling to understand why he thinks these legal stunts are going to work and Im even more struggling to understand where he has the money to keep doing this shit
 
The astonishing thing is Greer fails to realize that he has now given Hardin cause to speak with and possibly subpoena Huber.

Huber's only real connections to this case are in relation to the IFP fraud/Greer's claims of financial hardship, and to the extent that Greer lied to the court about his "emergency" request for a continuance (and there's a motion for sanctions forthcoming on that), as far as I can tell. I'm not sure how a subpoena on Huber would work, assuming discovery eventually resumes. Can you subpoena witnesses in a copyright case who have no knowledge of the case itself, solely for the purpose of demonstrating lies to the court, or would that have to wait until an appeal? Obviously you "should" be able to submit whatever proof you can find at any point, but courts are big on following procedure, or at least they pretend they are.
 
1748463493076.webp

When is this ever not the case?

1748463560221.webp

Russ, when a guy is getting subpoenaed, he will damn well know it. I would think a trained paralegal might understand this. Surely they covered "Top 10 Signs You Are Being Subpoenaed" in your classes?
 
Threatening to file criminal complaints unless the defendant agrees to a settlement is insanely unethical. I can't imagine the court being too impressed at all.

From the Nevada Revised Statutes:

EXTORTION

NRS 205.320  Threats.  A person who, with the intent to extort or gain any money or other property or to compel or induce another to make, subscribe, execute, alter or destroy any valuable security or instrument or writing affecting or intended to affect any cause of action or defense, or any property, or to influence the action of any public officer, or to do or abet or procure any illegal or wrongful act, whether or not the purpose is accomplished, threatens directly or indirectly:

1.  To accuse any person of a crime;
2.  To injure a person or property;
3.  To publish or connive at publishing any libel;
4.  To expose or impute to any person any deformity or disgrace; or
5.  To expose any secret,

is guilty of a category B felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 10 years, or by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by both fine and imprisonment. In addition to any other penalty, the court shall order the person to pay restitution.

Emphasis and fun bolding mine.
 
ECF 323, 324

It's probably pointless me trying to understand what goes on in his Super Duper Legal Brain (trauma lumps and all), but this made me scratch my head:

Screenshot_20250528-211452.webp
What Tennessee 2020 case did Mr Hardin ask to be unsealed? He asked for ECF 1 (the IFP documentation in this case) to be unsealed, but why is Greer referring to the Taylor Swift case? Mr Hardin does reference the Swift case in that motion, but only to say he paid the filing fee back then.

This from ECF 324 did make me laugh though (like most of his filings):

Screenshot_20250528-211239 (1).webp
Screenshot_20250528-211239.webp

What kind of arse-backwards mobile phone magically changes the word "emailed" into "subpoenaed"?! Funny how his phone keeps doing that - the same excuse was used in the Court conference recently when he tried to weasel out of his words by blaming them on autocorrect.
 
Insane Plown Fosse
1748464513963.webp
What kind of arse-backwards mobile phone magically changes the word "emailed" into "subpoenaed"?! Funny how his phone keeps doing that - the same excuse was used in the Court conference recently when he tried to weasel out of his words by blaming them on autocorrect.
i'd venmo a dollar for anywhore who could record an iphone changing "bizarrely emailed" into "subpoenaed" - with any typos or errors allowed.
 
Im struggling to understand why he thinks these legal stunts are going to work
They've worked up until this point, haven't they?

This thread is endlessly entertaining, but honestly I'm a chud going all in on nothing ever happening in this case. Greer keeps topping his bizarre antics, and yet has never once received a substantive slapdown for his outrageous behaviour. I know court proceedings are slow and orderly, but come on, he's flouted the rules like a dozen times at this point and STILL all these judges are happy to keep this trundling along.

Don't get me wrong, I topkek at all these court documents. But see you in this thread in 3 years when it'll still be in discovery :drink:
 
Imagine after all this plightsperging about Joshua Moon ruining his life, ends up with Shitlips in the can for criminal extortion.
Look on the bright side Mr. Greer, all that uncontrollable saliva will make you a rich man in the commissary account. Best prison gay this side of Utah?
 
Back