- Joined
- Apr 14, 2018
This really misses the point of the character. Toph has openly rejected gender roles and femininity that her family has put her in. While she did open up to it and enjoyed it on her own terms, she still rejected it in the end since she felt it wasn't her. Making her feminine from the beginning would even undermine that moment and her own arc. But if its her becoming more feminine after the tale of ba sing se, I mean it could theoretically be an interesting direction since if its an adaptation, you're free to have some creative liberties. However, given how the creative team behind the live action team handled the other chaacters it wouldn't work.
- Making Bumi into this hardened soldier who acts like a massive prick towards Aang.
- Aang already trying to act more responsible from the beginning.
- Sokka just being a good guy with no flaws of sexism which really takes away his own development.
- Azula being belittled by Ozai while Ozai is setup to have Azula's arc and Zuko kind of rushing his own development.
I feel these traits being sanded away especially Sokka and Toph's are the most insulting. Trying to act like sexist behavior doesn't exist would just make the issue of sexism worse, especially if your show is also meant for younger audiences, maybe seeing a character grow from that mindset would be good. Same with Toph as her defying of gender roles is important because gender roles shouldn't really define the type of person you are. Having her be feminine from the onset (assuming its her enjoying that on her own) is pretty insulting to people who don't fit into gendered stereotypes while saying it would "humanize" her more by being that way only adds to how insulting that is.
Can't wait for Season 3 to have Aang kill Ozai or have Azula redeem herself (like redemption could work for her, but not in the same way Zuko's does where they defy their father while he's at the peak of his power.)
To be fair some of these points are just pretty common tropes especially the last two points.is this series just becoming gen z harry potter
- kid's books/shows of wildly varying quality that go on to have live-action movies based on the source material a few years after debuting
- godawful dogshit sequels that the fanbase likes to forget
- four color-themed factions with different strengths and weaknesses that all bounce off each other well, with one being the explicit "evil" faction and another being the explicit "protagonist" faction
- beaten to death with an enormous expanded universe franchise that is mostly dogshit and doesn't elevate the original material at all, often outright misinterpreting or twisting it for political gain or the authors' whims
- authors who were already questionable when they began and have only gotten worse with time, as well as smug and very political outside of their work
and sometimes within it- criticism of it is VERBOTEN unless the author says something the fans disagree with
- endless shipping wars over the main characters spill out into the series and influence the finale
- "protagonist guy," "smart girl with vague attitude," "silly guy" trio saving the world from one bad guy whose plan hinges heavily on magic
- villainous antihero turns good in the last quarter of the story, becomes fan-favorite
Hell Harry Potter massively differs from Avatar in that the live action adaptations of it were actually good as the movies cultivated their own fanbase and there's a lot more people who watched the movies that never read the books.
Though I guess we'll see if the similarities emerge with that Harry Potter series.