What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

[cactus]

Bruh its beans, rice, and meat.

It's the mexiwater that makes you spew from both ends.

They make the beans and rice with lard though. That amount of fat creates loose stools.

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

I'm saying that modern civilization believes all kinds of shit because they don't know shit

there's a fancy philosophy word to describe this that's escaping me at the moment that (in my interpretation) meant their beliefs are accurate in their understanding of reality that's supports the idea that reality is illusion created by mass consensus.

To touch on that. I do think there's a general movement in education to say everyone in the past was an idiot and right now we are the smartest we have ever been to help foster the idea that everything being done is correct and you should never question it.

 

[NoReturn]

To touch on that. I do think there's a general movement in education to say everyone in the past was an idiot and right now we are the smartest we have ever been to help foster the idea that everything being done is correct and you should never question it.

"Things always get better" is one of those scarred-in thought-stopping concepts. People shut down if you suggest otherwise.

 

[Mike Matei's Penis]

If the Irish were in control the race swapping of all red haired females in media wouldn't be a thing.
Unless that's to throw us off the scent...

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

There was a rash of train based suicides that followed a similar pattern.

Can you share more info for the thread?

 

[I'm a Silly]

Hebrew is derived from the untranslated biblical word "ivri".

I assumed the Irish-are-jews post was a shitpost; either way, my policy is "yes, and" in most cases. That being said, tell be more about that new slur I can use, please.
Me on Xitter: Okay, ivri/I think this guy is an ivri/Ivri talking, opinion discarded/The Ivris and Their Lies

---

there's a fancy philosophy word to describe this that's escaping me at the moment that (in my interpretation) meant their beliefs are accurate in their understanding of reality that's supports the idea that reality is illusion created by mass consensus.

To touch on that. I do think there's a general movement in education to say everyone in the past was an idiot and right now we are the smartest we have ever been to help foster the idea that everything being done is correct and you should never question it.

"Things always get better" is one of those scarred-in thought-stopping concepts. People shut down if you suggest otherwise.

IDK if you're looking for "progressivism" as a word, but it fits.

---

I am going to comment on the below video:

The Why Files guy questions everything but the Holocaust™. Did you notice how he stanned the Italian commies? IDC whether Mr. Gentile is an actual gentile, because kikesuckers can come in any form. It's funny that he mentioned fleeing Los Angeles with his wife, being chased by obvious niggers:

We had a a podcasting studio in LA on Sunset. We were doing pretty well. Hosting a lot of shows, guys you knew, like when COVID hit. Kill Tony came and worked out of our studio, Jeremiah, Metzger, all all the guys. Didn't make any money but it was a cool setup but then they lock down the city impossibly and uh we didn't really know what to do then they set fire to the city somehow and uh the wife and I are racing down Hollywood Boulevard being chased by people with bats and and boxes of Adidas and uh we were like "This is this went this is too much." And we just started packing and that's it. We got out and I didn't know what to do so um you know I've been working in showbiz not super successfully like on the cusp but I've been a professional host, editor, producer, writer for TV, so I was like YouTube, easy, I'm a natural. So I started the channel talking about science and weird stuff and it was the hardest thing I ever did. It was, it was like impossible to do um and I started out like following all the consultants...

-- because Joe believes all looters are White kids.
Mr.Obvious is a black YouTuber, and you can call him an Uncle Tom, but you can't call him a liar:

preservetube
Mr.Obvious may or may not know that Joe is married to a woman who had a half black daughter and that Joe has vitiligo:

So Joe, who like most Americans his age would be brainwashed into hating "(fellow Whites)," has additional motive to distance himself from White identity and will not hesitate to throw a percvieved eebil wuhyte under the bus. This merely scratches the surface of why I don't trust him.

At the opening of the Why Files interview, Gentile and Rogan lampshaded all the accusations they believe they have gotten for being CIA plants.

preservetube
alt platform
odysee 1
odysee 2

 

[Sandshrew]

If the Irish were in control the race swapping of all red haired females in media wouldn't be a thing.
Unless that's to throw us off the scent...

If you rearrange the letters of "ginger", then you get "nigger".

 

[Dieter Laser]

Can you share more info for the thread?

I wish I could, I’ve been trying to find it all day. I remember it was like 15 to 20 children and it all took place either in Southeast Asia or it could’ve been Australia, but I’m not finding a lot of results. Also, it’s really hard to sort through because there are so many train suicides everywhere

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

I wish I could, I’ve been trying to find it all day. I remember it was like 15 to 20 children and it all took place either in Southeast Asia or it could’ve been Australia, but I’m not finding a lot of results. Also, it’s really hard to sort through because there are so many train suicides everywhere

I appreciate you trying. The reason I ask is because the partner of a friend of a friend threw themselves under a train, right in front of their partner, after saying "I love you". It happened around the time a few train suicides happened in the UK.

---

---

---

King Charles is visiting Canada, New Zealand and Australia, three commonwealth countries. Canada wants to join the EU army. The Eu want the UK to join the EU army and I don't doubt both NZ and Aus want to join in as well.
The question is, "Why?". War. That's why. America is positioning itself to be batting for both and neither sides, just like in WW1 and WW2, where they avoided entering the conflict to profit from both sides.
Russia, Iran and China seem to have a loose alliance going on, but knowing Russia they will 'nazi-soviet pact' the chinks in no time.
Europe then, must be preparing to be the battleground (again!) for a major war. Just as both world wars came as no surprise - the european empires, monarchs and aliiances knew WW1 and WW2 was going to kick off, it was a matter of when, not if - Europe must readying for a when.
Who will the belligerents be? Islam, of course.

Turkey will unite North Africa. The Middle east will rally around palestine to remove Israel from the map. The chinks will arm the pakis and push into India (where Russia will be arming India to push into China). The EU, Canada, NZ and Aus will collapse into civil wars amongst the muzzie population.
Or none of it will happen.

 

[three_little_rats]

Lately, I can’t shake this feeling that everything around me is fake — like, painfully fake. I don’t even know how to explain it properly… it all feels so unnervingly off, almost hyperreal. Like reality itself is trying so hard to convince me it’s “real” that it starts to feel like a parody.

It’s been getting so intense lately that sometimes it feels like if I just reached out, I could tear through whatever this thin veil is in front of me.

What’s behind it? I have no idea. But day by day, this sense of wrongness is getting louder, heavier, like a pressure building in the back of my mind.

Maybe I’m just going full schizo, who knows...

 

[12345]

I wish I could, I’ve been trying to find it all day. I remember it was like 15 to 20 children and it all took place either in Southeast Asia or it could’ve been Australia, but I’m not finding a lot of results. Also, it’s really hard to sort through because there are so many train suicides everywhere

If you know the year, you can narrow the search by typing before:2020 or whatever.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Maybe I’m just going full schizo, who knows...

That does sound very much like dissociation. It's common when you spend a lot of time immersed in unreality, behind a screen and out of contact with your own physical limitations. Exercise tends to help.

 

[NoReturn]

Lately, I can’t shake this feeling that everything around me is fake — like, painfully fake. I don’t even know how to explain it properly… it all feels so unnervingly off, almost hyperreal. Like reality itself is trying so hard to convince me it’s “real” that it starts to feel like a parody.

It’s been getting so intense lately that sometimes it feels like if I just reached out, I could tear through whatever this thin veil is in front of me.

What’s behind it? I have no idea. But day by day, this sense of wrongness is getting louder, heavier, like a pressure building in the back of my mind.

Maybe I’m just going full schizo, who knows...

That does sound very much like dissociation. It's common when you spend a lot of time immersed in unreality, behind a screen and out of contact with your own physical limitations. Exercise tends to help.

It also sounds like derealization disorder. @teriyakiburns is also correct that exercise will help. Not just cardio, though.

 

[big pauper]

I don't buy it.

- because she has boobs; it's such a weirdly specific detail.

The patinson-gimlin film made a huge impression on culture and the silhouette of Bigfoot taking a step is immediately recognizable as a symbol. But the silhouette doesn't show the breasts, so it's not something most people are familiar with, really. It's one of those high entropy pieces of information that stands out

The problem is that Robert Pattinson was a dying man with a legacy to prove who published books about finding Bigfoot. He had a history of swindling and conman behavior. The image of a Bigfoot with pendulous swinging breasts was one that he had previously created. It's suspect enough to be worthy of discarding on that merit alone.

But all of the analysis I've read about gorilla suits and the Bob hieronomous story just don't add up. They give very specific details about what happened that just don't describe what we see in the video. There isn't a zipper on the back of the suit. It all seeks to debunk, to find an easy explanation to back up the preconception that it's a man in a suit and doesn't seek to find real answers to any uncertainty.

Honestly, it probably was a suit designed by a con man to specifically fool a low resolution camera, who covered all of his tracks. It wasn't just a monkey suit from a cheap vaudeville act. Bob Gimlin was never in on it because Robert Pattinson knew how to run a swindle. Everyone is just taking a manufactured uncertainty as genuine because time has given it the benefit of the doubt and it allows them to build more uncertainty on top of it to take advantage of.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

The patinson-gimlin film made a huge impression on culture and the silhouette of Bigfoot taking a step is immediately recognizable as a symbol. But the silhouette doesn't show the breasts, so it's not something most people are familiar with, really. It's one of those high entropy pieces of information that stands out

The problem is that Robert Pattinson was a dying man with a legacy to prove who published books about finding Bigfoot. He had a history of swindling and conman behavior. The image of a Bigfoot with pendulous swinging breasts was one that he had previously created. It's suspect enough to be worthy of discarding on that merit alone.

But all of the analysis I've read about gorilla suits and the Bob hieronomous story just don't add up. They give very specific details about what happened that just don't describe what we see in the video. There isn't a zipper on the back of the suit. It all seeks to debunk, to find an easy explanation to back up the preconception that it's a man in a suit and doesn't seek to find real answers to any uncertainty.

Honestly, it probably was a suit designed by a con man to specifically fool a low resolution camera, who covered all of his tracks. It wasn't just a monkey suit from a cheap vaudeville act. Bob Gimlin was never in on it because Robert Pattinson knew how to run a swindle. Everyone is just taking a manufactured uncertainty as genuine because time has given it the benefit of the doubt and it allows them to build more uncertainty on top of it to take advantage of.

I don't know if that film is an actual shot of bigfoot or not. I don't think it changes much either way because upright walking primates have been observed in nature.
That an offshoot of primates doesn't, or didn't, exist is questioning our own evolution, seems as our ancestor, Australopithecus was just an upright monkey fella.

When I said "I don't buy it" I just meant, I don't buy that bigfoot, as a concept, is fabricated. Loch Ness I believe was/is a fraud, but a prehistoric animal existing today isn't out of the realm of possibility considering sharks and alligators are 200+ million years old.

 

[nym]

With the recent news regarding Google's newist video-making AI, I think we need to revisit the conspiracy theory that many of Joe Biden's public appearances were faked.
Did anyone ever keep an archive of all the different videos in which people pointed out his face unnaturally blurring, and ther things like that?

I want to additionally point out the extremely close relationship that Google had with the Obama WH, specifically with Hillary Clinton... ie., Google's Eric Schmidt getting his own office for a couple years in the WH, going around on a daily basis with HRC, as they publicly gloated about their [Google's] work alongside Facebook and other platforms in fomenting the color revolutions, etc. This period of the HRC State Dept was also (I would argue) what directly gave us most of the online problems we complain about today... the tech companies working hand-in-hand with the State Dept went way past Google and Twitter and Facebook. TPTB had too much access for years.
And so, it seems a straightforward continuation of these policies that at least parts of the AI team at Google would happily oblige the US government when they request for immediate access to their most-refined video modeling (which they can then subsequently clean up to get rid of obvious errors before releasing).

This leads to plenty of other possible situations... for all we know, the last time Biden was in public was the time he was meeting with the Pope alongside all the other world leaders, but unlike every other time the US President is among world leaders, they put Joe Biden all the way at the very end of the line... and then helped the geezer stumble away as there were rumors out of the media that they could smell it distinctly: that Joe Biden clearly shit himself while meeting the Pope.

So how much of this was ever real?

I really thought, and argued, that Joe Biden wouldn't make it through 6 months of his Presidency... and then I also thought they'd never let Trump get into office a second time, that they'd kill him. Seems I was wrong on both accounts, like I seem to have a blind spot with regards to how long these Presidents will last...
but was I really wrong on the first one?

 

[Moomalade]

Looking at that Pattinson-Gimlin footage I agree it is an above and beyond effort for the suit if it's a fake. The things that stand out for me that make it fake though are the articulation of the locomotion. Simians have a lot more restricted motion from the hips to the chest, far less than humans. This is evidenced in the way as they walk upright, when a leg is pushed out, the whole torso, including up to the shoulders, faces into the direction of the foot placement. With this footage, the arms and chest are swinging counter to the steps, as would happen with a human and complete articulate separation of hips and chest.
The other thing that points to a fake, is the complete lack of articulation on the back with each swinging arms, there would be under the surface shoulder blade motion. Yet the whole back structure is completely static despite the large swing radius of the arms. This would imply it's just a big enveloping suit concealing physicality underneath

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

oblige the US government when they request for immediate access to their most-refined video modeling (which they can then subsequently clean up to get rid of obvious errors before releasing).

To add to this, the AI we know about and have access to, just like most technologies, is two decades behind what TPTB really have.
Google, way back in the early 2000s, demonstrated two technologies that, at the time, blew my mind. Firstly, they could artificially generate an image using a text prompt, while simultaneously demonstrating how an image could be 'cleaned up' using prompts - a picture of a daffodil in a field could have the field removed and replaced with any other fake background, while keep the real picture of the daffodil in tact.
Secondly, they showed compression technology that could reduce the file size of a dancing figurine from 10mb to 10kb, on the fly.

That blew my mind because generating an image from text prompts is seriously impressive, or it was 20 years ago, nowadays it's old news, and because we suffer from so much bloat in modern day computing. Which, I believe is a conspiracy in itself.

---

---

---

This one goes deep.


When Gears of war 2 launched, we saw, in real time, a drop in the quality of AI (as in, the 90s nerd version of AI, not the slop buzzword used in the modern day) beyond what I had ever seen. The once intelligent enemy bots became brain-dead, clunky, slow-to-respond and slow-to-act. The previous game had AI that was vicious, aggressive and caused pause-for-thought when engaging. Before Gears of War, Epic Games were well known for the AI enemies in their Unreal games. Unreal 2000 for the Dreamcast, had enemies that learned from your patterns of attack and would swap their routes of engagement if you got the drop of them too often.

Why did we see such a drop in AI? Well, most people said it was to lower the bar of entry to attract new, casual gamers. They argued that the computing power of an Xbox 360* was not enough to render graphics and the Ai at once - a bullshit argument that falls apart on inspection. The reduction in the intelligence of the AI and the increase in bloated filesizes go hand in hand. The Xbox 360* and every subsequent console, CPU and GPU released have more power than we're allowed to access, lots and lots more power**. That extra power is locked out to drive the cause of the bloat and the reduction in AI; data gathering. The processing power, and the reason why every game is now online only, is to increase the depth and breadth of the data gathering.

EA admitted to listening to all words spoken on a headset***, or when connected to any microphone device (It's also the reason mobile companion apps and 2FA using your phone became prevalent; it was a way to legally listen to your voice when calling one of the enemy players a cheating twat.

Inputs into a computer, game, or online service are monitored. Every key press, every d-pad nudge, every controller slammed against the floor is monitored. That's why rumble and motion controls in pads are now standard? They measure your feedback.

Every piece of software you use, every game you play, every console or piece of hardware you buy is restricted on two fronts; software is bloated with spyware and data gathering software, and the barrier of what is acceptable is artificially increased. By that, I mean 4k, ray-tracing, 'bitcoin mining' etc.

However, and this is the juicy part the data gathering is only the financial aspect, it is the compensation for the companies who are all in on the big conspiracy, which is to steal technology from you and reverse the course of progress because we went too far, too fast and TPTB lost control. The internet**** was stolen from us, our hardware is stolen from us, our software is bloated as to not work on computers more than capable of doing so. Linux generally has better performance than windows on the same hardware because the bloatware and spyware programs aren't compatible with Linux, or don't work on some base levels within the system*****

*The Xbox 360 was made by Microsoft. Microsoft are the same company who worked with NSA to spy on domestic and foreign citizens at the behest of the US government, sharing the information with the five-eyes countries.
**The processing power inside the PS3 and xbox 360 is beyond comprehension, relative to what we have 20 years later. The Ps5 and XSX struggle to render games in 1080p at respectable frame rates. They cannot render 4k natively. The XSX is 4900% more powerful than an xbox 360, but cannot render graphics only 16x more demanding (1080p-4k).
***EA had a presentation leaked where they discussed using voice data scraped from headsets and in-game chat, to make the game more difficult for players and to artificially boost the health and power of enemy AI's, then offer 50% discounts on one-time boosters. For example, a player could say "Fuck this game, the enemy team are too quick". EA would then offer speed boosts for a limited time, playing off of psychological FOMO techniques to push sales. This idea was too on-the-nose, so instead, EA opted to hook players in by making the game easier and more fun when phrases like "last game and I'm off to bed" or "This is pissing me off, this is my last match". How many of us gamers have said "one more game" and then been hooked for hours?
****The internet, once a place of free sharing of information, disclosure of top secret projects and of course, 'piracy'. For example, Abovetopsecret.com, when first launched, leaked details on future weapons platforms and technology that, 20 years later, is now common place. It was shut-down and co-opted by the intelligence agencies, like much of the internet. 4chan and Digg (reddit) became too big to control and had to be co-opted, shut down, turned into honeypots or invaded with bots. Tumblr was a website where art was freely shared, yet was closed down to applauds and cheers from bots and shills. I can go deeper into Tumblr in another sperg post if requested.
*****Those who will say that this is impossible, only need to turn to Microsoft (them again!) as to what can be done on a hidden level. Mossad requested Microsoft and (IIRC) Intel, create hard drives that would be delivered to Iran and used in their Nuclear Power Plant - the one supposedly enriching uranium for nuclear weapons. The Iranians weren't stupid though. They kept their NPP firewalled up to the hilt, with no chance of espoinage or cyberattacks possible at all. However, when the Iranians came to turn on their computers to run the NPP, disaster struck. A virus, somehow, made it into their system and corrupted everything, forcing the NPP back years. What MS, Intel and Mossad did, was to build HDD's with code hidden below the level of the lowest level of the kernel. Code that could not be detected by anyone, no matter how good their skills were, no matter how deep they looked in the code. This hidden program, when plugged in to the NPP computers, activated a virus that spread throughout the entire plant. This happens today on all modern hardware to restrict their ability.

TL-DR - Technology is artifically restricted to prevent the plebs from being too powerful, too knowledgeable or from being able to escape the control of TPBP. In the past, they did this by erasing advanced civilisations (Tartaria) or destroying technology too good (Free energy, Nuclear power, water-powered cars, free sharing of software via piracy). However, in the day of social media, the internet and smartphones, destroying technology is too obvious, so instead, TPBP artificially restrict it through various means and methods.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Mossad requested Microsoft and (IIRC) Intel, create hard drives that would be delivered to Iran and used in their Nuclear Power Plant - the one supposedly enriching uranium for nuclear weapons. The Iranians weren't stupid though. They kept their NPP firewalled up to the hilt, with no chance of espoinage or cyberattacks possible at all. However, when the Iranians came to turn on their computers to run the NPP, disaster struck. A virus, somehow, made it into their system and corrupted everything, forcing the NPP back years. What MS, Intel and Mossad did, was to build HDD's with code hidden below the level of the lowest level of the kernel. Code that could not be detected by anyone, no matter how good their skills were, no matter how deep they looked in the code. This hidden program, when plugged in to the NPP computers, activated a virus that spread throughout the entire plant. This happens today on all modern hardware to restrict their ability.

Stuxnet was introduced to the Iranian nuclear program by agents plugging in infected USB drives

https://www.kaspersky.com/resource-center/definitions/what-is-stuxnet

 

[nym]

Iran

I mean, Iran definitely was pursuing nukes, just like Iraq was. They know that's what would let them sit at the Grown-Ups Table.
Stuxnet code has been analyzed. The remarkable part of that, yeah, was breaching that firewall, but mostly because it was designed to successfully jump from one system to an entirely different type of system... multiple times. And then still work, and work over the course of years. Destroying centrifuges is a big deal, because that's really the one key step that prevents any poor country from attaining nukes.

Do you really believe that Tartaria stuff, though?
I guess I don't know how many all-in Flat and Hollow-Earthers and such are around here.