Next time I fly I'm taking all my clothes off so they can see I have nothing to hide. If it doesn't bother me, why should it bother them?
Could I pray that this is also true about india? I'd love it if half their shitskin population was just rather large piles of shit on the street that didn't get cleaned up.
Pro choice? maybe like, frat guys not trying to have kids? otherwise I think most men are pro life, (Keep it in your pants people)
There are protests every day in France too yet France remains a shithole.
climate doomer death cultists are like children picking out their favorite legos from different sets who then get very upset when those pieces don't form a coherent building or vehicle. they have no understanding of the amount of planning and work that went into making things function the way that they do now
Arguably, the US has been in a cold civil war since Trump's first term, since that was when the disaffected electorate broke from the Uniparty's plan.
it's not that easy
it's not that easy either, even large strike action is often not representative of the whole population (huge urban/rural divide for example)
I quite obvious that the modern 3 way split of governmental powers doesn't work and hasn't worked for a century now. The Judicial has more power than the Executive or Legislative and it's more secure in it's hold of that power.
There was a value when every single branch of the government was manned by Anglo Saxon Europeans with shared common heritage, interest and faith. Now, everyone doesn't give af.
This is simply not so. The Chinese government has extraordinary contacts with citizens. Censuses are conducted every decade. Every compound has a party cell, every subdistrict in a city has a party, every district, every municipality, all the way up to the top in an unbroken chain of command. This is just the org chart of course, not some all knowing panopticon pyramid thing, but there are many points of official contact. Household registration books (Hukou) are quite serious and being on a hukou determines a lot about your life. There are middle school and high school examinations. There is public transit use and interprovincial transit. The government has extraordinary surveillance all around, owns like half of the country's GDP, and endless amounts of data coming in. It is not a low tech or low effort dictatorship.
There are lots of Chinese children who are not on hukous and struggle with something akin to statelessness. Many families had more than one child, though it was not particularly common. Fines were also imposed if you register your second and third kid, but they amount to taxes. Also, some ethnic minorities were generally exempted from the 1 child policy. The One Child policy was enforced unevenly and in strange ways and adhered to unevenly. It was only with the passing of generations that it became expected to have one kid.
I think it might look like that, but I think that Roberts was the one who carefully maintained that 'power'. People say that he's spineless and doesn't have any legal philosophy, but I think that Roberts is a realist. His decisions are entirely political and theatrical, meant to position the court as these detached, fair arbiters in the public eye while refusing to touch issues that would bring any real federal power to bear on the court under the fear that it would crack. Both Scalia and Ginsburg were furious about several refusals to grant certiorari to cases dealing with fundamental due process rights, and would probably have also both been furious about the way the court refused to back up other rights like speech during Covid. I think a lot of his jurisprudence is based on the assessment that the power of the court is a fragile illusion that could be shattered by both a very driven federal power structure simply ignoring a decision and a public who supports them in doing so. I think that if you had a more brazen court you would have seen it crushed by the 'iron triangle' long ago - it survives because Roberts is a shrinking violet.
It is easy. Electric car = good, solar power = good. So
No, the balance of the judicial branch has aways been kinda wonky because their role in goverment was poorly defined in the constitution and their ability to interpret the laws meant could interpret them to give themselves more power.
All of them!
Is this some chink “dreamers awaken” thing? Is your surname Dagoth, by any chance?
All of them. The JEW-diciary is rotten to the core
hope it happens to accelerate jacksoning.
