Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[sneedem&feedem]

But it's also entirely possible they just want to avoid skellysuits.

So to avoid a lawsuit from Rekieta they're risking a lawsuit from Null? Is this Kandiyohi county calling Null bitchmade and that he won't sue? "WELL ACKSUALLY WE ARENT RELEASING JACK SHIT WUT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT BISSSH?"

 

[Meat Target]

Then if they insist, their generational wealth continues to pour out into the soil for useless love of their spoiled, retarded son. If they insist that's the best use of their money, that's what happens and karma does take its due in that way instead. What could have been a great family becomes an unremarkable one because Rackets is that retarded and egoistic and his parents are enablers who get exactly what they deserve from him.

...but wait...
"We can remain retarded longer than they can remain solvent".

Dear Feeder should set up a drive for the warchest. Bankrupt those enabling fucks.

 

[SigmaBalls]

But we're so good at it!

You were good son, real good. maybe even the best.

So to avoid a lawsuit from Rekieta they're risking a lawsuit from Null? Is this Kandiyohi county calling Null bitchmade and that he won't sue? "WELL ACKSUALLY WE ARENT RELEASING JACK SHIT WUT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT BISSSH?"

"I DON'T THINK YOU DESERVE THAT BODYCAM TO TELL YA THE TRUTH ABOUT IT"

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

If this motion prevents the bodycam footage from going out, then Nick Rekieta and Kandiyohi County have unfortunately sentenced Ethan Oliver Ralph to death. This is because when Ralph receives the $5,000.00 owed to him by Null, he will immediately die from an overdose. Nick, why would you do this to your friend?!

 

[Joggin Noggin]

Retard question here, so is this the county directly countering Josh to say he doesn't have a right to the bodycam due to not being public record on that account?

In effect, kinda, but I think of it more as them at least saying "Null's not entitled to it under this specific subsection".

It could be because the prosecutors actually care and don't believe that Null is entitled to the footage at all, or it could be them realizing that this is a fight that will happen regardless between Nick and Null and they want to make sure the record is as accurate as possible so no fault can be placed at their feet if the footage is released. It takes very little time to draft this and given how public this case is, I wouldn't want some ambiguity from my hearing resulting in footage being released under an inapplicable statute. Hard to tell based solely off the filing what the prosecutor's motivations actually are.

This would simply get rid of the easiest argument for Hardin to get the footage under Section 13.82(7), but 13.82(7) still allows for inactive investigation data to be gotten, including images and recordings, photographs, video, and audio records, unless the data is "clearly offensive to common sensibilities" in which case it's classified as private or nonpublic data.

For an investigation to become inactive, one of the following things has to happen:
1) A decision by the agency or prosecutorial authority to not bring charges (inapplicable);
2) expiration of the time to bring a charge or file a complaint under the applicable statute of limitations, or 30 years after the commission of the offense, whichever comes earliest (inapplicable); or
3) exhaustion of or expiration of all rights of appeal by a person convicted on the basis of the investigative data.

Minnesota Criminal Procedure 28.05 gives you 90 days to file a notice of appeal after the judgment has been given and sentence imposed, so Nick's case can't become inactive until at least July 17, 2025 since he was just sentenced on April 18th.

So 13.82(7) appears to still be an avenue for Hardin to get the bodycam, even with the state clarfiying that the bodycam footage wasn't an exhibit, but first it'd have to become inactive and then it becomes contingent on if the court believes that the release of the bodycam footage (even if heavily redacted) would clearly offend the common sensibilities of their shithole state. The court also has to weigh the benefit to Null vs any harm to the public, the agency, or anyone identified in the bodycam footage that would be released. I'm not going to waste time reading cases to find out where the "common sensibilities" line has been drawn in the past regarding bodycam footage of a guilty man's arrest while in his home, but I imagine that Minnesota is probably not as keen on releasing it compared to the average state.

 

[Chazzed Up]

The fact that even the county is sweeping for Nick at this point is hilarious. What kind of karmic lottery winner do you need to be to slip out of consequences this consistently? The sacred geometry of lolcows is truly beyond mortal understanding. It's staggering. They suffer, but only ever because of their own narcissistic bondage. External reality can never touch them.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

It sounds to me like Pierce was reserving the right to enter them as evidence, which is different from a formal listing of them in a disclosure of exhibits to be used at trial. This motion (if granted) may remove one ground for disclosure of the footage, but certainly doesn't foreclose other avenues for disclosure.

It was the Barneswalker who cited the footage in his motion to dismiss and uploaded the footage as exhibits prior to the hearing. White and Pierce do not appear to be on the same page throughout the hearing about what she was "conceding" to, and she has to come in at the end to clarify what she actually agreed to.

Yeah that seems to be the most obvious explanation as he follows that by saying they relate solely to a single issue which was just raised and discussed (i.e. "we've already covered/agreed on what the body cams would be used for ostensibly so we can just move on from any further discussion of them for now").

The transcripts also reflect that White wanted to get it on record that he raised it in the omnibus hearing because he concluded that there was a case where a similar issue was found to be harmless error because it was raised later in the proceedings.

 

[AnOminous]

So to avoid a lawsuit from Rekieta they're risking a lawsuit from Null? Is this Kandiyohi county calling Null bitchmade and that he won't sue? "WELL ACKSUALLY WE ARENT RELEASING JACK SHIT WUT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT BISSSH?"

No, it's more that if they officially deny it and then put on an anemic defense and "lose" the lawsuit, they're immune from anything. They'd be acting pursuant to a court order.

The only real question here is whether they're really dedicated to fighting this disclosure, or whether this is just window dressing.

I'll trust whatever nool does, which will probably be based on whatever Hardin recommends. Maybe it's worth it, maybe it's not. Not up to me.

 

[Null]

Hey @Null is Rekietas fear of god this morning related to the bodycam? just trying to rule things out

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.

 

[Rent Tin]

The fact that even the county is sweeping for Nick at this point is hilarious. What kind of karmic lottery winner do you need to be to slip out of consequences this consistently? The sacred geometry of lolcows is truly beyond mortal understanding. It's staggering. They suffer, but only ever because of their own narcissistic bondage. External reality can never touch them.

It is universal human nature that people want to do as little as possible, even if it causes them more trouble in the long run. Bureaucratic entities and governments are no different.

 

[Silver Coin Anon]

God sneed, you beautiful bastard.

This is a constitutional violation.

 

[Tiger Jack]

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.

I guess it's on then. Godspeed, Null.
Mostly because it would be very embarrassing for you to owe Ralph $5000.00

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.

That footage must be really bad if he is that spooked by a phone call.

 

[AnOminous]

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.

And away we GOOOOOOOO!

 

[Meat Target]

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.

From what you said on MATI, I gathered that the county has already agreed to give it to you. But now they're trying to renege on that agreement for whatever asinine reason.

 

[PyrrhicRustle]

Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

And they’re helping him, which pokes a few holes in his conspiracy theories.

 

[An Autistic Axolotl]

Hey @Null is Rekietas fear of god this morning related to the bodycam? just trying to rule things out

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence.

Why was he so shaken then?
Wouldn't he be doing victory laps?

Godspeed Null.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Lolcow will be entering an appearance as an intervener in his criminal case. This is a constitutional violation.

Remember to record the shower call you get from Nick later today.

He will 100% try to talk you out of it.

 

[Old Bay Sneedsoning]

The court also has to weigh the benefit to Null vs any harm to the public

Given Nick's repeated statements disparaging the integrity of pretty much every facet of the Candy Yoshi County justice system, I'd argue that it's in the peoples' interest to make the footage public. He very heavily implied that the police planted the cocaine in his house during the search on Chrissie Mayr's show, and if that's true, then the citizens of the county deserve to be able to watch the bodycam footage for themselves to determine if that actually happened as Nick alleges. Do the people not deserve to know if their police officers are corrupt?

 

[Swole McPole]

Yes. The county is trying to withdraw the body cam as evidence. They don't have a right to. Nick has been screaming, begging the prosecutor to help to get this result.

Remember the days when prosecutors never used to let criminals publicly cornhole them? The public cornholing always went from prosecutor to criminal.

It only seems like yesterday. How far has this once noble profession fallen.