Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
I am getting some definite "Why won't you just die, Medicare Null?!" vibes from Nick here. Like he knows Null isn't gonna stop.

If Null said he was gonna sue should they not comply and release the footage, that's what he's gonna do. It was obvious to me. Never known the dude to lie.
I'll be looking forward to the Dear John(Null) 2.0 stream of his vapid gloating. Which will inevitably be juxtaposed to the eventual release and conclusion of the Bodycam Arc
 
Why would the sheriff help Nick ? I thought everybody hated him in the county
You can help someone simply because your motivations align, not because you like him. There may be something in the video that the prosecutor and sheriff feel like may cause actual reputational damage to the cops or the department while also knowing that it'll show Nick's house was a crackden.
 
the legal question then seems to be
the legal question is why is the county helping child abusers avoid any miniscule punishment at their own expense like a bunch of gay pro child abuse cocksuckers and why is minnesota in general and that shithole nigger county so pro child abuse in the first place and also why are they so gay and fucking retarded. thats the real legal question imo. hopefully they file it
Even he knows he's wrong and the body cam is inevitable
its either inevitable or hell have to answer why the supposedly ebil county who raped his kids are helping him this much, cant even say its to stop "the chomo kiwis" because he called the county chomos, which tbf if theyre helping nick abuse his kids and cover it up this badly they might be for different reasons.
 
Lol Nick really pulling the Sargon classic "you're acting like white niggers" line

Reminder that Nick's favorite anime that he loves so much he has it on Blu Ray is about children raping each other and has graphic child rape scenes in it.

The fact Nick's still this salty gives me hope we're still getting it and that the bodycam stuff wasn't the emergency.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if this was a desperate, twofold attempt to save face for the county and to honor a backroom deal that the sheriff had with Bob and Celeste.

Can't have their least successful baby boy ruin the family image, y'know.
I think people are over thinking the Rekieta angle. It's small-town Minnesota, not only is Kayla's family local to the area, but the entire family is deeply involved with the community, would not be surprised if the Sheriff/prosecutor was doing it for Kayla rather than Nick. There's also a good chance that the sheriff/prosecutor have personally met the rekieta's/in-laws at various community functions & events.

(edits): Grammar & such.
 
Last edited:
so the prosecutor is trying to retroactively claim that the bodycam was NOT evidence because it was not used in the omnibus hearing and should not count as evidence. the legal question then seems to be whether 1) its use in the motion to dismiss based on april's mirandizing/not means it qualifies as evidence and 2) whether its use at any other point during the case makes it count as evidence no matter what the judge/prosecutor says about its non-use in the omnibus.
In my opinion, if the bodycam footage was attached as an exhibit to a motion and filed in the court after the commencement of criminal proceedings I would say that definitely counts as evidence. The statute merely says "presented as evidence in court" and makes no mention of what stage of the proceedings it has to be nor does it specify that it has to be admitted to be shown to a jury at trial.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if this was a desperate, twofold attempt to save face for the county and to honor a backroom deal that the sheriff had with Bob and Celeste.

Can't have their least successful baby boy ruin the family image, y'know.
I was joking a few days ago about how I want the bodycam footage to be played on national television to mortify their boomer friends, but it seems that Celeste and her husband legitimately fear that outcome more than the specter of what will become of their grandchildren growing up like this.
 
rekieta racist.webp

I wouldn't want a lawyer that uses this kind of language
 
I wouldn't be surprised if this was a desperate, twofold attempt to save face for the county and to honor a backroom deal that the sheriff had with Bob and Celeste.

Can't have their least successful baby boy ruin the family image, y'know.
It probably shows way more cocaine than they recorded, and the cocaine that disappeared miraculously lowered the amount to a lesser charge. All done as a favor by the Sheriff at the behest of Bob and Celeste, they are probably a family friend which would also explain why he would be willing to defy a court order for their benefit. Wouldn’t surprise me if that missing cocaine went right to April at Bob and Celeste’s house as part of her payment to stay quiet and they would make her charges go away.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be surprised if this was a desperate, twofold attempt to save face for the county and to honor a backroom deal that the sheriff had with Bob and Celeste.

Can't have their least successful baby boy ruin the family image, y'know.
I think it's more that they're embarrassed about the whole thing. Nick has brought a ton of attention to their small county and made a complete ass of himself and said a lot about a lot of people in their legal community because he refuses to keep his mouth shut.
 
I wouldn't be shocked to discover that a LEO acting under the authority of Kandiyohi County held down Nick's minor child and injected her with a solution containing cocaine, using a hypodermic needle and cocaine that was stolen from the police evidence room. There's really no way of knowing without seeing the video.
Is Candy Yoshi county a den of corrupt evil pigs who frame people just for dissenting from the government? Do they really just break into random YouTube streamers' homes and throw around drugs and frame them?

As the Law Pope said, you never know what cops bring into your home. I'm totally convinced now that Nick was completely framed by the corrupt cops, who were paid off, and utterly framed him!

#freecuckieta
 
Back