Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Coon Cheese]

Someone's not happy.
View attachment 7428287
archive

This level of seethe indicates that we are 100% getting the body cam this week. well kiwifags i guess things DO work out the way we say

 

[1NpuLs]

Suddenly Ralph remembers the bet, it seems. Just like he drew it up!
View attachment 7428648
(L / A)

seems like rekieta called ralph. i don’t think he has the mental capacity for the whole evidence thing

I think the "never offered as evidence" is goanna be the new cope by rekieta and the Baldo washer

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Sean/ Potentially Criminal/ The Fat Man said that it likely was Nick crying to the County more than the County deciding to cover it up.

Nick is literally spazzing out to the people trying to imprison him. I bet he suicide baited, @AnOminous you think he suicide baited?

 

[Mr. Manchester]

I know, but listening to these balldo sweepers preen is irritating. Especially Karl.

That's an important part of the experience too. As they narrow down you get to know them and then you can speculate on which bridge gets burned next. If it wasn't for that we wouldn't have the Rare Gators thread.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

I’ve just given up on it being something anyone is following up with. Which is pretty outrageous, considering the context of other ongoing cases

As far as I'm aware we have:
- Aaron hacking case.
- Bodycam.
- Montegraph defamation.
- Probation.
- Whatever Gabe Hoffman knows.
Bad news he received are likely related to one of those things.

 

[AnOminous]

I now understand what a shark feels like. I never knew. There's blood in the water.

I want to go into a frenzy. BLOOD. BLOOD. BLOOD!

FRENZY!

Feel free, my finny friends.

 

[unironicjudiaism]

I cannot see the angle of police misconduct being the reason for the hold up. If that cam had any scrap of exonerating footage rackets would be first in line to trumpet it and would have never taken a deal. Even if it showed his house looking like an episode of hoarders. He sacrifice everyone and everything else for a sliver of W

The more likely scenario was as mentioned. Government workers being forced to do actual work. Ask for a police report you need and where I live you can wait a partial eternity for it even if it's a simple traffic accident report.

End result is this Nick's going to have episodes of lawsplainng the interwebz:

New Zealand Fruit Farmers V. Candy Yoshi County

Get your popcorn ready for these live streams

 

[Vibralldo]

Sean just said people have gone to the courthouse and watched the bodycam video.

He also said that once something is in evidence they can't take it out

 

[DemsBNutz]

If it doesn't come out, he should commission a play

Ooo even better court TV re enactment style dramatization?

 

[AnOminous]

Nick is literally spazzing out to the people trying to imprison him. I bet he suicide baited, @AnOminous you think he suicide baited?

Do it bitch nobody cares.

 

[Dammit Mandrake!]

I'm leaning towards the DA trying to keep it hidden for purely local PR reasons. They don't want CandyYoshi's Beaver Cleaverville Minnesota Nice image further sullied by association with a gay child-abusing cuckold ex-lawyer, let alone by way of the Autistic Illuminati gangstalker forum.

this is probably it. Think about Lorena Bobbitt and how the big news about whatever city it happened in is that event from 40 years ago. When you're a small town, whatever True Crime shit happens becomes the only thing you're known for forever. Its like how being named Hannibal or living on Elm Street has certain connotations no matter what

So wait a minute...

You're telling me that Nick Rekieta may ruin his county's reputation and they'll hate him for a generation and beyond?

 

[ICantLegallySayThat]

Suddenly Ralph remembers the bet, it seems. Just like he drew it up!

A Ralphamale W? Its over Nick. The bodycam has to come out now.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Look forward to Null's "The Book was Better" watch-along stream, everybody.

I’d be fairly pleased just with Null dramatically reading the account.

I know, but listening to these balldo sweepers preen is irritating. Especially Karl.

Every time some white knight of balldonia defends Nick’s honor about abusing his kids, what goes through my mind is how often I find myself thinking about how my wife and kids would manage if something happened to me.. so I have little amounts of CONSTANT existential guilt that I need to take my vitamins and get some cardio and this and that to maximize the time I have for the kids to grow up and all of that..

And Nick is fucking ok with one of them coming into his office and finding his blue fucking body, lifeless at his desk, with the last several months of their memories of him being that he was literally fucking retarded on galaxy gas and screaming about how much he loved his side piece to the world

If anyone doesn’t think that’s abuse, I don’t even know how to start. You have to be a real piece of shit to overlook the responsibility Nick has as a father, how much he doesn’t care about what they see, what they feel.. how he’s systematically stripped away their sense of security in this world and made such a titanically fucking wretched example for all of them not in one area, but by profaning everything the miasma of his pathetic existence interacts with

Nick is blackpilling his family every single fucking day. Nick goes to church? Now his kids think it’s fake. Nick was a lawyer? How are his kids ever supposed to believe any aspect of the system is competent in any way.

 

[Niggernerd]

Suddenly Ralph remembers the bet, it seems. Just like he drew it up!
View attachment 7428648
(L / A)

Ralph, you're barely conscious most days and you lost to a pre recording of a lecture and mistook it for Jared Taylor.

 

[elonmaize]

So wait a minute...

You're telling me that Nick Rekieta may ruin his countRy's reputation and they'll hate him for a generation and beyond?

FTFY and yes

my bobbitt example was on point, guarantee that video will go super viral same way chris chan's arrest did

 

[Coon Cheese]

I've said before that the best part of acquiring the body cam footage is not the footage itself, but Nicks reaction will be the best part. it isn't even released yet, and the milk is already flowing from Nicks udders, DRAMA SISTERS WE ARE FEASTING TONIGHT.

 

[Butt_Pouncer]

How possible is it to render an AI generated version of the bodycam based on the 3 handwritten accounts of it? I'm not saying we should do it, just curious if it's even at all possible?

 

[Vibralldo]

Anytime there’s an intrusive thought of self reflection, crack a whippet.
Anytime there’s friction in the household, crack a whippet.
Anytime there’s confrontation, pushback or pressure, crack a whippet.

I can't tell if this is yet another devo reference

 

[Folgers Can]

In my opinion, if the bodycam footage was attached as an exhibit to a motion and filed in the court after the commencement of criminal proceedings I would say that definitely counts as evidence. The statute merely says "presented as evidence in court" and makes no mention of what stage of the proceedings it has to be nor does it specify that it has to be admitted to be shown to a jury at trial.

As a silver lining regardless of how Judge Wentzell ultimately rules, this motion will remain funny enough in its own right as yet another testament to how worthless Nick is as a legal commentator to whatever 1500 or so dregs still consider him one, because the motion now reveals that his shit take about bodycam privacy's court-filed exhibit exception supposedly only applying to trial evidence wasn't even the position adopted by actual practitioners that are supposed to be taking his side. His error is acknowledged at least by the county attorney's position, and perhaps even acknowledged by the Barneswalker insofar as he is said to stipulate to the county attorney's motion rather than filing something separate to argue for the same outcome on other grounds, because the motion clearly assumes the underlying predicate that the Barneswalker's ill-advised upload of two complete bodycam MP4 files into MNDES as exhibits in support of a contested omnibus motion would have made those exhibits public, but for today's desperate ploy to undo that mistake by claiming that those exhibits were somehow withdrawn or made moot by comments uttered in the omnibus hearing.

For context, just take a moment and look back to this prominent legal commentator's shit take on the Friday nonce roundup just six days ago, to assess whether it aged well:

Again, there's two ways that this could become public. One is if it was used at trial. If it was entered into evidence, it goes from private data to public data... unless the file's sealed. We didn't have any evidentiary hearings that involved the bodycam footage. It was never entered into evidence in either case, and so that shouldn't - that shouldn't matter. So the only avenue of "attack" that he would have would be that there's a public interest in correcting some sort of improper narrative.

[Timestamp 1:40:56]

Considering how he was so supremely confident in that "used at trial" position that today's motion just threw out the fucking window in less than a week, it makes more sense why he would have been so shook this morning by any abrupt revelation that the county rightly considers the filing of pretrial exhibits a very serious issue. Shocked that anyone would ever disagree with his shit take, of course he would have needed to cut the stream short to "remedy" the situation with a whole afternoon of his and the Barneswalkers' flailing about threatened lawsuits to finally prod the county attorney into filing this low-effort two-pager to cover the county's ass by tossing the hot potato into the hands of the judicial branch that independently came into possession of the same footage. That might not be the own Nick thinks it is, however, since any surprise ruling by Wentzell to simply leave the court record sit as-is would enjoy significantly more immunity from liability than any release of bodycam footage by executive branch officials would have.

Such a surprise ruling would also end up bolstering Hardin's public interest theory with a "cat's out of the bag" argument that the executive branch might as well release whatever portion of the bodycam footage has already been deemed publicly viewable (if not recordable) in the hands of the judicial branch anyway. That would already be consistent with some Minnesota historical precedent (albeit nonbinding) that Nick's shit legal take didn't seem to take into account, and which may be worth a quick recap here for comparison. For anyone who didn't follow the lead-up to the George Floyd bodycam footage release closely at the time, it's an understandable common misconception that it must have come out under the more obvious and easier statutory exceptions pertaining to police use of force and riot prevention, but the reality at the time was not that simple and that precedent had a lot to do with bodycam evidence's use in pretrial motion practice combined with just the sort of "damage is already done" argument that Null has been teasing lately. Consider for a moment the timeline of oddly familiar events in that case:

1. July 8, 2020: Attorneys for one defendant, Thomas Lane, file a pretrial motion to dismiss that submits exhibits to the court presenting bodycam evidence in support of a contested request for relief:


[L]

2. July 15, 2020: In reaction to the act of introducing bodycam evidence as an exhibit in court making it public data for the first time, members of the public are permitted to view the bodycam footage at courthouse terminals so long as they don't record it and only describe what they saw:


[L]

3. Morning of August 3, 2020: The Daily Mail releases a short low-quality segment of the bodycam footage that had been leaked to the Daily Mail from an unidentified source:


[L]

4. Afternoon of August 3, 2020: The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office announces an investigation into the Daily Mail leaker, who was not a government source and instead would have been someone who was on the short list of people who went through the self-doxing appointment process to view the footage at the courthouse terminals, and took the risk of a potential contempt charge by bringing in a spy camera in violation of the court order not to record, but has never been caught:


[L]

5. Friday, August 7, 2020: Following a media coalition's arguments about public interest that would only have been bolstered by the fragmentary Daily Mail leak's intensified public interest that further weighed in favor of releasing a remainder of the footage in the interests of completeness, Judge Cahill orders complete release of only the two officers' bodycam evidence that had been used in support of pretrial motions, notably distinguishable from other officers' unreleased footage that had not yet been used in that way:


[L]

Comparing to the present situation, some similarities leave the door open for Judge Wentzell to ease into the same outcome that Judge Cahill did. First, just like Lane's attorneys, the Barneswalker filed a contested motion to dismiss that directly cited to bodycam evidence in support of the motion, and indeed he even went above and beyond Lane's attorneys' use of mere transcripts by simply uploading MP4 video files of two officers' bodycam footage into MNDES and referring to timestamps within that video without any indication that excerpts were ever clipped:



Secondly, somewhat similar to the incomplete picture presented by the Daily Mail leak, there have already been public statements to the effect that photos of the balldo bunker's interior condition leading up to the arrest have somehow made their way out into the world, such that the later bodycam footage depicting essentially similar conditions wouldn't work irreparable harm and if anything a more complete record could help to dispel any misconceptions created by any incomplete leaks:

I've seen pictures that someone has sent me, and I have not revealed them and I won't ever reveal them, because that will very quickly out that source, but no, I've never shown bodycam images...

[Timestamp 3:23:20]

I have pictures of the inside of the house, taken before the raid, from someone else, but they're not from the bodycam. You understand that, right? This person has pictures of inside the house, from beforehand. You understand that somebody in that house had a cellular phone that could take pictures, and those pictures of inside the home got to somebody who got to somebody who got to somebody, who then said, "hey Sean, do you want these," and I have them.

[Timestamp 3:41:19]

Thirdly, somewhat reminiscent of the Floyd bodycam footage being viewable only in-person at the courthouse, there have been recent public statements that someone was needed to go to the Spicer/Willmar area in person, followed by later public statements that "someone has seen" what is on the as yet unreleased footage, and that Null "already has something" so "the damage is already done":

I need someone willing to drive to Spicer to get in touch. Preferably from the same group of people as before, but I know many of them had to go out of their way. DM me.

Here is the clip containing the full segment of commentary on the bodycam footage:

...Every single thing we have received—I don't want to be too... I don't want to say too much, because I know that Rekieta is paying close attention and is deeply concerned.

Developments have happened which paved the way for the body cam footage to be released. If the body cam footage is not released, then I will sue. So that's it. There is no reason for it not to be released at this point. We've squared away everything, and the only thing holding us back is the sheriff's office actually fucking doing it. ...

...I want to hold his hand, but the damage is already done. I'll put it that way. Obviously, I would like the actual footage footage, and I will do everything in my power to get the footage footage. But the foot's in the door. I already have something. And if all else fails, there's no walking it back. It's done."

"...[Quoting Josh] "I'll tease it this way. There's two lawyers and an entire law firm involved. They all want it, and I've confirmed someone has seen it. It's going to happen and it's not going to vindicate him." [Unquote].

Conclusion: while I'm not suggesting that anyone was brazen enough to actually bootleg of any footage viewable at the courthouse like the Daily Mail leaker did, I would submit that mere confirmation of bodycam footage's limited viewability under the court-filed exhibit exception, combined with public statements about photos of the interior of the home that could potentially be publicized in the future, and combined with public statements about viewings of the bodycam footage that could potentially be publicized by written summaries in the future, would collectively support a plausible argument that the complete "footage footage" (as Null put it) ought to be released so as to dispel any misconceptions that might arise from the incomplete picture presented by various sources about what the footage supposedly depicts, just like Judge Cahill had to do.

This method of getting the footage is preferable mainly because it would be the funniest, since the very thing that paved the road to this moment was ironically Nick's own decision to move forward with that retarded Franks motion in the first place and he has nobody to blame but itself. If he had simply pled out early with a cushy first-offender deal likely no worse than the one he has now anyway, or if he had at least filed a truncated version of the motion without using bodycam footage to simp for April with a futile attempt to get her statements excluded prematurely when a motion in limine later on would have been the appropriate time anyway, then he wouldn't be in this position now. This would also be funnier because you just know his cope would be to immediately blame it all on the Barneswalker and talk a bunch of mad shit that could make his treatment of the nanny look like a cakewalk by comparison. Last but not least, it would be very funny if after all of Nick's pontification about his previous lawyers' ignorance of the "rule of completeness" last year, it turns out that the bodycam footage is released on the basis of a more or less similar principle, just for the chance to see him hoisted on own petard once again. All it would take is a stroke of luck where Judge Wentzell simply does nothing with a ruling that the prior record will be left exactly how it sits.

 

[Dumbledore's Onlyfans]

I demand Candy Yoshi declare me a Lakota Sioux or else I'll Lakota Sue. I once knew a Lakota Sioux guy. That basically makes me one myself.

It doesn't count unless you're also double Eskimo brothers like Nick and Aaron. Sorry, but them's the rules.