Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 105 34.4%

  • Total voters
    305
I guess one way to handle this would seem to be to have the people who saw the footage swear an affidavit regarding their summaries being a true and honest evaluation of the footage they saw. If Nick continued to say that the summaries are false, he would open himself up to a potential civil suit for defamation. Any declaration by him after the sworn affidavits are made available to the public at large would be tantamount to saying that the individuals that swore the affidavit did so under false pretense, and I can't see why that wouldn't be actionable in a civil proceeding. Then the footage could be entered into evidence to demonstrate that Nick knowingly defamed the individuals in question despite knowing that the summaries they provided were true and honest and the sworn affidavit was not done under false pretense.

We all know that Nick can't keep his mouth shut if his life depended upon it, and if he couldn't, he could be made to back up his mouth in a court of law. If Nick intentionally stopped saying anything about the summaries after the affidavits were made available to the public at large it would be obvious that he was intentionally avoiding talking about them because to maintain his narrative he would have to continue to say the summaries are false, which would open him up to civil liability. It would essentially act as defacto verification that he knew he was lying, because if he wasn't lying, he would obviously continue to say the same thing.

Further, if he didn't release the footage at that point the question would be, if these people are making a sworn affidavit that their summaries are true and accurate evaluations of the footage, and the footage showed otherwise, why wouldn't he release it? The obvious answer is that the footage would verify everything that was in the summaries. There could be no other reason since anyone in their right mind would want to clear their "good name" if they could, but we all know it is because he absolutely can't.
 
RRU: REKIETAMALES RISE UP!
Total Crackets victory! We will NEVER see the bodycam (which Nick used to say would vindicate him) because Nick and the great state of Minnesota say he doesn't need vindication! Jewsh? TRANSITIONING! Lard and Tard? FELTED! Ralphamale? PAID 100 KNU! Kiwifags? COPING AND SEETHING (eats single Dorito)! Nitrous? HUFFED! Wife and children? BEATEN! And as for the upcoming Null v. Nick lolsuit?
Just ask Nick's wife and children how he handles conflict ✌️✌️✌️
 
Whoa there buddy! calm down, does this look like a man that would lay a hand on his beloved sweet heart?
IMG_8521.webp
“So we still doing this? You watch my kid, I watch yours?”
 
matted dreadlocks and piss-soaked afros gang-banged this woman
Mutt’s Law. Kek.
I think Nick is literally and genuinely fatphobic. It's always a first go-to dig at people even if they aren't fat. Nick seems to consider even a normal and healthy body weight to be "fat" in his eyes. At the height of his addiction, when he was basically a skeleton, he felt he was at an ideal body weight. We can also look back at streams where he talks about what he ate. Outside of the calories from alcohol he was probably eating less than 800 calories of actual real food a day, and he was okay with that, and thought it was a healthy meal plan. When he talks about what he finds physically attractive about women, the very first thing he talks about is how skinny he likes them. I truly think Nick, if he is in the presence of a "fat" person (again, his definition of fat is VERY loose), it probably uncomfortable for him to be around
Remember his hedonism diatribe? His main reason and main defense for wanting to do the nude party stuff was because it helped him realise nobody cares what you’ve got going on body-wise. He said he saw really unattractive people, fat, letting it all hang out without shame. This was really cool for him to experience and he reflects upon it as a great experience. Which is funny, because he didn’t actually become a better or more understanding person from this, it just made him feel better about himself.

Nick is incredibly insecure about himself and externalises it onto others.
 
“Listen judge,” the prosecutor says gesturing to Nick, “this retard has already brought bad publicity to the county and letting this footage out will just exacerbate things. If we block it here, fighting us will become too big a pain in the ass and they’ll just give up on it. It would take stubbornness to a self-destructive degree to fight for this, and there’s no way this Moon guy is like that.”
Mr. Moon proceeds to explain at length how everyone who died on D-Day died a fool's death
 
I think if Josh could have gotten the last of the notes it would have been interesting if he could have done a round-table stream with the note takers, with voice changers as needed, and gotten additional thoughts from them as they went through the descriptions.
 
By the end of this saga it will turn out he molested his daugthers isnt it? :suffering:
With how utterly degenerate he is it's sadly possible.
So it worked like this. I contacted Katie to schedule a time for seeing the evidence. I could not make the first date, but the second date I could. the issue with the second date is that I was told that I could view the evidence but I would not be able to rewind or pause it. I still agreed to come and view the evidence and take off the cuff notes because we needed notes on the second video. I only went once but everyone was very kind and the process was easy. Katie was professional with me. They must have known I was coming because the guard at the front at the metal detector knew what I was there for. She set me up in a room while streaming the footage on a screen but I could not interact with it any way. She had to run and do other things. At the final 20 minutes mark, the stream crashed and I had to leave because they were on a tight schedule. I discussed coming back to finish with Katie and she kept her word and sent emails on the new date. I only got the email this morning saying that I could no longer come back and view the footage.

Edit: my notes were never withheld, I brought my own notebook and transcribed them in a google doc at home.
Total Kiwifarms war incoming.
 
Rekieta-Report-Weekly-Special-30-05-2025.webp
With recent drama involving mysterious phone calls, revelations from Keanu Thompson, and efforts to prevent the release of bodycam footage, one would assume Nick Rekieta is revelling in the spotlight of public discourse? Surely, his numbers must be increasing?
1748636974655.webp
Wrong !
Peak Concurrent Viewers – Week-by-Week Change:
WeekPeak ViewersChange from Previous Week% Change
28/04–04/055,901Sentencing WeekN/A
05/05–11/057,219+1,318+22.34%
12/05–18/052,214–5,005–69.32%
19/05–25/051,937–277–12.51%
26/05–01/061,631–306–15.80%

Average Concurrent Viewers – Week-by-Week Change:
WeekAvg. ViewersChange from Previous Week% Change
28/04–04/052,358Sentencing WeekN/A
05/05–11/051,883–475–20.14%
12/05–18/051,597–286–15.19%
19/05–25/051,335–262–16.40%
26/05–01/061,145–190–14.23%
Assuming a continued linear drop, projected average viewers reach zero in approximately 3.8 weeks

1748638123066.webp
Nick's subcount continues to shit the bed, constantly losing subscribers. This data is only updated once a week as YouTube advertisers don't like subdrop parties.
 
For some reason they think acting like a bunch of collusive hicks trying to protect some wife swapping crackhead who abused his children in their area is a better look for them than doing the right thing and allowing the footage to be released?

That's a real headscratcher... Either Nick has some powerful dirt on these people, or they are literally all completely retarded.
 
By the end of this saga it will turn out he molested his daugthers isnt it? :suffering:
Bro, I've written similar posts and backed it out too many times.

Skeevy drug guy with a "favorite daughter" pretty much always means one thing and one thing only. If we have any evidence that Nick lets her do "adult" things (like cocaine...) that the other kids don't get to do, or tells her that she's special or advanced for her age I would consider it as good as conclusive that he is either fucking her or plans on it in a few years.
 
So, swinging stuff. Trying to work out a timeline.

We now have YellowFlash dropping in that Nick mentioned he and Kayla had swung with a random couple in the past. This would’ve been a while ago, because Nick told him this during the the Vic stuff. Nick begins soliciting his Locals for nudes, hiding behind Kayla as an excuse by having her post underwear pics (which I don’t doubt she actually wanted to do, by the way, she would’ve loved the validation). When he lusted for Mandy on stream so much that he had to apologise publicly to Kayla for it, he also used her as a shield by saying it was her that’d compliment Mandy in person. During this time (or before?) Nick gets caught trying to fuck Faren, and says it was Kayla’s idea to open the relationship. Sometime after that, the Imholtes enter the picture, and it’s all OK because Kayla is fucking someone else too… until she’s not, and suddenly Nick has a wife and live-in crackwhore aka April.

Am I missing anything?
 
For some reason they think acting like a bunch of collusive hicks trying to protect some wife swapping crackhead who abused his children in their area is a better look for them than doing the right thing and allowing the footage to be released?

That's a real headscratcher... Either Nick has some powerful dirt on these people, or they are literally all completely retarded.
I mean it's Minnesota. When was the last time something good came from there?
 
By the end of this saga it will turn out he molested his daugthers isnt it? :suffering:

Why else do you think he's been projecting pedophilia on so many people for such a long period of time? If you ever look at someone who has committed a serious crime, it is almost a guarantee at one point or another they have said or done something that seemed like nothing at the time, but in the context of their crime, they were really spilling all the beans, it's just that no one could see it at that point.
 
Back