Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 82 30.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.5%

  • Total voters
    265
Rekieta is live right now with the literal who chocolate syrup woman. Less than 200 live viewers. He’s talking about his experiences doing drugs.


IMG_4497.webp
 
So it is a personal opinion, not a legal one.
It is my belief Sean is offering a legal opinion, and not some philosophical one. He said "I don't think you can," instead of something like "I wish you wouldn't be able to."

But the man is right here. He even responded to one of your posts just recently saying that he believes the two bodycams were introduced into evidence. If you wish to debate him, feel free. You asked me who proffered such an opinion, and I said Sean, while directing you towards his argument.

I personally have no reason to disagree with Sean. Maybe others feel differently.

Ultimately, this may or may not matter though, because it is not yet clear what the legal basis will be for Lolcow LLC's lawsuit against Kandiyohi County. I am sure that will become more clear in time.

Nick posted cat pics earlier today because he thinks it'll stop us from wanting the bodycam footage
I am allergic to cats. I am a dog man.
 
Sunshine laws aren't really a direct crime deterrent, but they are a way of the public having the presumptive right to know exactly what the fuck the government they're paying tax dollars for is ACTUALLY DOING with them.
Fun fact, Sunshine laws are the reason we have Florida Man. Florida's Sunshine laws are so open, nearly anything and everything is readily available for the public to access. If you're a journalist looking to fill in some sort of article quota, just fire up arrest and case reports in Florida. Endless bounty of stuff to write about.

The funny thing, if all states had Sunshine laws as open as Florida's, there wouldn't be a "Florida Man."
 
ok mr white collar college educated lawyer please enlighten the masses on what chewing tobacco is for faggots from your gaming studio
Because I couldn't have grown up in any other environment than the Providence Yacht Club.

Anything longcut, and especially anything in pouches would get you mocked where I was a kid.

I started out on Skoal Wintergreen, Fine Cut, because that was what I could scrape up from the tins scattered around my Dad's truck. I didn't think it was controversial. I didn't mean to offend your delicate Zyn pouches.
 
And absent an actual basis confirming this is improper, we are back to whether admin errors count for permanent lefal designations,

Even saying that what was done actually constitutes an "administrative error" is somewhat a reaching conclusion and is accepting perhaps more of the argument made by the locals than is necessary. It can be argued that this is as much about disorganization among the defense team and their own incompetence as it is any kind of administrative error. There are certainly all sorts of legal errors that cannot be corrected after the fact.

There is an equal amount of question over under what legal authority the judge took this action. Its more than unusual in the courts for a judge to consider something as evidence, release as evidence to a public audience and then suddenly change his mind very quickly after the fact. An argument can be made that what was done goes against the spriit of the law concerning the records.
 
"Missing" prescription or "her precious little baby needs extra meds but the mean old doctor won't prescribe, so she'll just get some for him under her name" prescription?
I would hate to think Celeste would be complicit in such illegal activity such as giving prescription drugs to anybody they aren't specifically prescribed to. Judging by her failson she must be a paragon of law abiding virtue.
 
Even if we don't see the footage, we have the next best thing with written recaps - it's like reading the script of an unmade movie. Semper fi to our field agents. I wonder if the emergency yesterday was Nick learning that people have accessed the videos and are scheduled to see them again.
Funny thing, the recaps make everybody look good - cops are acting professionally, Kayla tries to comfort the children which is very motherly, April is just scared and confused. Only Nick looks bad - the same smug, condescending sub-80 IQ piece of shit who thinks he's the smartest person in the room, The Balldo we know and hate.
If the lawsuit happens and Hardin is involved, I expect it to be more entertaining than seeing the inside of the hovel. I hope we can make all people involved famous through the means of lawfare.
 
Rekieta is live right now with the literal who chocolate syrup woman. Less than 200 live viewers. He’s talking about his experiences doing drugs.

Just for clarity, she is a thot who poured chocolate syrup all over her exposed skin during a stream to please her "special interest" fans who apparently are into people who look like they are covered in literal shit.
 
oh yeah werent bodycams specifically supposed to be to show how cops are interacting with the criminals and with the community in a transparent manner? there was a big stink about that but now apparently the court can just tell you you actually dont have that transparency so the cameras are nearly useless ig and just safety theatre. i actually completely forgot the reason they were introduced from how opaque the process to get access seems to be.
Their main function is to collect any additional evidence or testimony to use against the criminal, with transparency being a good benefit because they have the whole encounter recorded that they can show the public should people raise a stink. But the biggest problem here is Minnesota, who goes out of their way to protect criminals and only adopted bodycams out of national pressure to do so.
 
Is there some other enticing effect I'm not aware of or is it really that fucking retarded?
It really is that retarded but drugs like cocaine actually do stimulate parts of the brain that give reward mechanisms, essentially training the brain to want more and more of that shit.

I could post a bunch of bullshit from neuroscientists but Clapton more or less explained it.
It just makes you feel REALLY GOOD.

Until it makes you feel REALLY WORSE.

Stay away from this shit!
 
Would you, in your expert opinion, say that this unprecedented and bizarre action by the court in Nick's case has the potential to be studied as a legal oddity, attracting the attention of people who otherwise would never have cared about it?

If so that would make it a textbook example of the Streisand effect, and that's pretty funny.
I am in no way an expert, and I am not licensed in MN, but yes this is going to be a very interesting legal issue
 
It just makes you feel REALLY GOOD.

Until it makes you feel REALLY WORSE.
I mean the same could be said about weed but at least it's not as expensive, on the path to full legalization, lasts longer, and has some legitimate medical applications.

It's funny how movies and TV try to paint coke as this cool 80s drug when it's objectively more retarded than shit like heroine, and that's hard to achieve.
 
Given the expense and criminal risk associated with it, how fast it wears off really calls into question the appeal. I find it hard to understand why it is worth hundreds if not thousands of dollars and the violation of serious laws for a brief moment of being twitchy/hyper. Not to mention the crash out that follows.

Is there some other enticing effect I'm not aware of or is it really that fucking retarded?
I view it like you do, from a logical position. It makes no sense. But I will tell you that I tried it one time, very good quality cocaine from a famous person, and the feeling that swept over me... well I can tell you, I knew in that moment of euphoria, that I had met my devil. It was an indescribably good sensation, and it was terrifying. I never touched it again. That was the one and only line of cocaine I ever did, twenty five years ago.
 
Fun fact, Sunshine laws are the reason we have Florida Man.
I've pointed this out multiple times myself in semi-defense of Florida Men (including Josh).

Florida Men should be a national thing. We need to end the practice of the government being able to hide its activities. Whatever the government does should be public knowledge. What the fuck is the government doing with our money that it takes from us basically at gunpoint?

If the government does anything, we have the right to know why and what it did.
 
So, we should really get this corruption of this small little county in the mainstream. Can we all tag and reach out to Ana Kasparian from the Young Turks? I recall this being her guilty pleasure. You can't just subvert the publics right to information for a child-abusing drug addict at the crack of dawn, tell the people coming to see it to go home, and it all stay hush hush. Daddies money can only go so far, Rekieta.
I think that small town corruption like this is a more specialized thing and might not be in her wheelhouse. Doesn't she generally comment on national news and politics? I wonder if there are any reporters known for looking into this kind of stuff who would find this case interesting. Like the kind of people who do longform substacks or podcasts over these things.
 
Back