Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 107 35.0%

  • Total voters
    306
This is a special case, though.. I hung out with a lot of dumb people as a teenager, and did a lot of dumb things, and even among people whose illustrious futures involved things like prison for burglary, it was well fucking understood that nitrous was the lowest of the low. It was the drug equivalent of picking cigarette stubs out of public ashtrays. Huge shame stigma
Yes, Nick is dumber than dumb. :)

I guess being fucked up 24/7 has trashed the irony processing part of his brain.
View attachment 7432909
archive
He's so lame.

It is my belief Sean is offering a legal opinion, and not some philosophical one. He said "I don't think you can," instead of something like "I wish you wouldn't be able to."
Again, I'm searching for legal authority. "Should" isn't legal authority, even when it's correct. It's clear that Kandiyohi County's position is that "not accepted" removes it from being automatically public. Why do they believe so? I don't know (though I understand the theory), and I haven't seen anything definitive on that point. Depends on what "presented" is interpreted to mean. If they're way off-base, and "presented" doesn't require a formal offer live in court, and excising certain exhibits from the record is improper, great!

But the man is right here. He even responded to one of your posts just recently saying that he believes the two bodycams were introduced into evidence. If you wish to debate him, feel free.
I did respond to him. I'm not debating; I'm looking for concrete support for either position.

You asked me who proffered such an opinion, and I said Sean, while directing you towards his argument.
Arguments are arguments, and I appreciate Sean's experience. It's not personal; I'm asking questions and would be pleased to see authority for confidence that the Order as complete bullshit. But I won't do it out of emotion, because that gives no clear sense of where things might end up.

Even saying that what was done actually constitutes an "administrative error"
What else is it that they were marked as received when they weren't? That's not even a matter of whether they were presented or offered into evidence. The Court did not acknowledge them as received/ accepted/ admitted, and specifically called out in its Order individual exhibits, which group did not include these.

is somewhat a reaching conclusion and is accepting perhaps more of the argument made by the locals than is necessary.
I suspect you understand that doing that is part of the assignment.

It can be argued that this is as much about disorganization among the defense team and their own incompetence
God, yes. As I said above, White should have taken steps to remove the things as he said he would (or at least check to confirm everything was done as expected), and he obviously did not. Slack. This shouldn't be a 2025 issue.

as it is any kind of administrative error. There are certainly all sorts of legal errors that cannot be corrected after the fact.
Of course. But is this one?

There is an equal amount of question over under what legal authority the judge took this action. Its more than unusual in the courts for a judge to consider something as evidence,
Where did that happen?

release as evidence to a public audience and then suddenly change his mind very quickly after the fact. An argument can be made that what was done goes against the spriit of the law concerning the records.
Possibly. But the transcript and Order from last year support - imperfectly and incompletely, no question - a counterargument.

Just for clarity, she is a thot who poured chocolate syrup all over her exposed skin during a stream to please her "special interest" fans who apparently are into people who look like they are covered in literal shit.
I'd be embarrassed for him if I didnt think that water found its own level.
 
No, that’s a really important distinction. The most degenerate I get with my wife now that I’m married is we’ll order drinks if we go out for dinner
Imagine hating your children, your literal genetic legacy, little humans that you helped create, because they get in your way of partying.
 
I agree and can sum it up as: Nick Rekieta is a walking talking serotonin syndrome.

Bear in mind, serotonin's a neurotransmitter that helps your body regulate two of your most important functions: Sleep and appetite. Cocaine acts like an SSRI, inhibiting the re-uptake of serotonin, thus giving you the thrills. But steady use results in the deregulations of your sleep patterns (important for sanity and immunity), and your appetite. Serotonin syndrome leaves you as a husk that prowls the world hungry for reclaiming that now-impossible thrill, leaving you irritable and unable (not just unwilling but unable) to socially connect with others in a healthy way. Sound like anyone we know?
Serotonin syndrome leaves you foaming at the mouth after having several seizures, unless you're referring to something more specific to cocaine.
 
So that same kind of voice had the same thing to say to me as it did about a lot of substances.. “if someone offers you it for free at a party, ok. But buying Costco sized bulk units for use at home would be very, very stupid.”
Best advice though, do not have anything to do with that shit. Ever. For any reason at all.

Exhibit A: Nick.

Meme:
ikd0wcmwvsi01.webp
Imagine hating your children, your literal genetic legacy, little humans that you helped create, because they get in your way of partying.
Imagine being Nick!

Imagine hating your kids!

Imagine watching niggers fuck your wife!

Imagine jacking off while that happens!

Imagine doing all the other crazy diseased shit Nick did in his foul, filthy, hoarder hovel full of filthy clothes from the floor to the ceiling, where it was literally impossible even to walk around in this foul giant "mansion" full of filth and disgusting disease from floor to the ceiling, where it was barely even possible to move around because of the utter filth.

The only presentable part of his filth hovel was the tiny part of his house not completely covered in disease and filth, much like he claims his favorite filth demon was Nurgle, was the tiny little part of his hell hole hoarder hovel that he does his videos in. And even that is disgusting. And hilarious because it has his sad identification of himself as the Joker in it.

Every other part of the place this filthy scumsucking bastard lives in is appalling. All his kids have to exist in filth.
 
Last edited:
What I want to know is what profits Kandiyohi County going to the mat over the body cam footage? The taxpayers are going to have to pay to defend the lawsuit and if they lose they will have to pay for the plaintiffs side of things too.

Is saving Nick from embarrassment worth all of that?
the DOJ protects its own. at the end of the day, nicky is a lawyer (his current legal status not withstanding). They couldn't ignore the blatant fuckery he was doing which is why he was charged, but do you really think that anybody else who wasn't on the inside, even as loosely as balldo is would get the soft treatment he did? Anybody else would have completely lost custody of their children, would have gotten closer to 10 years than 5, and not have their sentence suspended. For fucks sake, he had enough party drugs in that house to fuel a week-long orgy in a hollywood mansion, and his kids tested positive for having them in their system, plus all the guns and booze sitting out in the open within reach of the children and the general mess of a state the house was in. There is absolutely no good reason they went easy on him, they did so because he is/was one of them, however loosely.

this is their attempt to further prevent any embarrasment of the justice system by proxy. Although it's really transparent what they're doing, and enough details have come out so they look bad no matter what. They might as well just give up the sauce at this point.
 
Imagine hating your children, your literal genetic legacy, little humans that you helped create, because they get in your way of partying.
Yeah, no.

The first year after we had our first, my wife and I got a hotel room and planned a bar crawl for our anniversary.

We got to the end of our first drink and called it cause it felt too weird to leave our kid with my sister. We just went home and got our kid
 
Depends on what "presented" is interpreted to mean. If they're way off-base, and "presented" doesn't require a formal offer live in court, and excising certain exhibits from the record is improper, great!
I mean I guess I'd phrase it this way, if filing exhibits in support of a motion with the court isn't "presenting evidence" what term would you use to describe this action?
 
Nick claims that police intervention in his affairs was due to nothing related to drugs, but due to complaints for unspecified "other things."
Good thing we have the search warrant for his arrest that proves that the lying faggot is indeed a lying faggot.


His fucking niggardly tactics of trying to spin this and rewrite history are all the more reason for us to see the bodycam footage.
 
the DOJ protects its own. at the end of the day, nicky is a lawyer (his current legal status not withstanding). They couldn't ignore the blatant fuckery he was doing which is why he was charged, but do you really think that anybody else who wasn't on the inside, even as loosely as balldo is would get the soft treatment he did? Anybody else would have completely lost custody of their children, would have gotten closer to 10 years than 5, and not have their sentence suspended. For fucks sake, he had enough party drugs in that house to fuel a week-long orgy in a hollywood mansion, and his kids tested positive for having them in their system, plus all the guns and booze sitting out in the open within reach of the children and the general mess of a state the house was in. There is absolutely no good reason they went easy on him, they did so because he is/was one of them, however loosely.

this is their attempt to further prevent any embarrasment of the justice system by proxy. Although it's really transparent what they're doing, and enough details have come out so they look bad no matter what. They might as well just give up the sauce at this point.
He's a belligerent faggot that had no respect for the law or the people meant to uphold or enforce it. If you got in the way of his fun, he had 'clever' (for him) little names for you. Or apparently wishing death upon you via an STI. Even when he was practicing, he wasn't what I would refer to as a good lawyer.
 
the DOJ protects its own. at the end of the day, nicky is a lawyer (his current legal status not withstanding). They couldn't ignore the blatant fuckery he was doing which is why he was charged, but do you really think that anybody else who wasn't on the inside, even as loosely as balldo is would get the soft treatment he did? Anybody else would have completely lost custody of their children, would have gotten closer to 10 years than 5, and not have their sentence suspended. For fucks sake, he had enough party drugs in that house to fuel a week-long orgy in a hollywood mansion, and his kids tested positive for having them in their system, plus all the guns and booze sitting out in the open within reach of the children and the general mess of a state the house was in. There is absolutely no good reason they went easy on him, they did so because he is/was one of them, however loosely.

this is their attempt to further prevent any embarrasment of the justice system by proxy. Although it's really transparent what they're doing, and enough details have come out so they look bad no matter what. They might as well just give up the sauce at this point.
Plenty of work for Hardin though. With a fat payday at the end if he wins. I would imagine this case is catnip for a lawyer whose practice was primarily about Freedon of Information. Between this and Monty's lawsuit I imagine Kandiyohi County is going to be seeing alot of Hardin the Hardship.
 
Why was this hidden by the county? Simple: Nick's Slap-on-the-wrist sentence will make the entire county look bad if this gets out.

Imagine how shitty your legal system will look when that footage is publicized and this relatively famous man is still wandering around with his children. That's exactly why Nick needed an extreme sentence but thanks to an abortion of justice nothing serious happened to him. By all accounts this is child abuse. No ifs ands or "allegedlys" The state failed these children by letting them live within the open door crack den
 
I am allergic to cats. I am a dog man.
Sorry, hate to say this, but you're a nigger.
Dogs are the superior quadruped. Fite me.

(But not here, please, as the thread gets enough traffic as it is).

What I want to know is what profits Kandiyohi County going to the mat over the body cam footage? The taxpayers are going to have to pay to defend the lawsuit and if they lose they will have to pay for the plaintiffs side of things too.

Is saving Nick from embarrassment worth all of that?
Again, I think it's to spare the County embarrassment.

More specifically, it's in the hopes of preventing more people from asking "difficult" questions like:

- Why does this faggot have his kids back?
- Why did the CA not press the child endangerment charges (which are apparently a slam dunk)?
- Why was Nick not shot in the back of the head by Det. Pomplun and his body dumped in the lake that's on the property (okay, that last one is a joke... maybe).

You know... questions like that.

I mean, people are already asking those questions based on the two written descriptions of the bodycam posted. I think people tend to more visual and auditory than literary though. They say seeing is believing, and more people would believe by seeing.
 
Last edited:
Back