- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
If this has already been addressed, my apologies, but is there anything to stop the sheriff from just deleting the footage before Null can get his litigation underway?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, Nick is dumber than dumb.This is a special case, though.. I hung out with a lot of dumb people as a teenager, and did a lot of dumb things, and even among people whose illustrious futures involved things like prison for burglary, it was well fucking understood that nitrous was the lowest of the low. It was the drug equivalent of picking cigarette stubs out of public ashtrays. Huge shame stigma
He's so lame.I guess being fucked up 24/7 has trashed the irony processing part of his brain.
View attachment 7432909
archive
Again, I'm searching for legal authority. "Should" isn't legal authority, even when it's correct. It's clear that Kandiyohi County's position is that "not accepted" removes it from being automatically public. Why do they believe so? I don't know (though I understand the theory), and I haven't seen anything definitive on that point. Depends on what "presented" is interpreted to mean. If they're way off-base, and "presented" doesn't require a formal offer live in court, and excising certain exhibits from the record is improper, great!It is my belief Sean is offering a legal opinion, and not some philosophical one. He said "I don't think you can," instead of something like "I wish you wouldn't be able to."
I did respond to him. I'm not debating; I'm looking for concrete support for either position.But the man is right here. He even responded to one of your posts just recently saying that he believes the two bodycams were introduced into evidence. If you wish to debate him, feel free.
Arguments are arguments, and I appreciate Sean's experience. It's not personal; I'm asking questions and would be pleased to see authority for confidence that the Order as complete bullshit. But I won't do it out of emotion, because that gives no clear sense of where things might end up.You asked me who proffered such an opinion, and I said Sean, while directing you towards his argument.
What else is it that they were marked as received when they weren't? That's not even a matter of whether they were presented or offered into evidence. The Court did not acknowledge them as received/ accepted/ admitted, and specifically called out in its Order individual exhibits, which group did not include these.Even saying that what was done actually constitutes an "administrative error"
I suspect you understand that doing that is part of the assignment.is somewhat a reaching conclusion and is accepting perhaps more of the argument made by the locals than is necessary.
God, yes. As I said above, White should have taken steps to remove the things as he said he would (or at least check to confirm everything was done as expected), and he obviously did not. Slack. This shouldn't be a 2025 issue.It can be argued that this is as much about disorganization among the defense team and their own incompetence
Of course. But is this one?as it is any kind of administrative error. There are certainly all sorts of legal errors that cannot be corrected after the fact.
Where did that happen?There is an equal amount of question over under what legal authority the judge took this action. Its more than unusual in the courts for a judge to consider something as evidence,
Possibly. But the transcript and Order from last year support - imperfectly and incompletely, no question - a counterargument.release as evidence to a public audience and then suddenly change his mind very quickly after the fact. An argument can be made that what was done goes against the spriit of the law concerning the records.
I'd be embarrassed for him if I didnt think that water found its own level.Just for clarity, she is a thot who poured chocolate syrup all over her exposed skin during a stream to please her "special interest" fans who apparently are into people who look like they are covered in literal shit.
Imagine hating your children, your literal genetic legacy, little humans that you helped create, because they get in your way of partying.No, that’s a really important distinction. The most degenerate I get with my wife now that I’m married is we’ll order drinks if we go out for dinner
Serotonin syndrome leaves you foaming at the mouth after having several seizures, unless you're referring to something more specific to cocaine.I agree and can sum it up as: Nick Rekieta is a walking talking serotonin syndrome.
Bear in mind, serotonin's a neurotransmitter that helps your body regulate two of your most important functions: Sleep and appetite. Cocaine acts like an SSRI, inhibiting the re-uptake of serotonin, thus giving you the thrills. But steady use results in the deregulations of your sleep patterns (important for sanity and immunity), and your appetite. Serotonin syndrome leaves you as a husk that prowls the world hungry for reclaiming that now-impossible thrill, leaving you irritable and unable (not just unwilling but unable) to socially connect with others in a healthy way. Sound like anyone we know?
Best advice though, do not have anything to do with that shit. Ever. For any reason at all.So that same kind of voice had the same thing to say to me as it did about a lot of substances.. “if someone offers you it for free at a party, ok. But buying Costco sized bulk units for use at home would be very, very stupid.”
Imagine being Nick!Imagine hating your children, your literal genetic legacy, little humans that you helped create, because they get in your way of partying.
I need officer Moists videos.
The law, but they can just delete the footage if they don't care about the consequencesIf this has already been addressed, my apologies, but is there anything to stop the sheriff from just deleting the footage before Null can get his litigation underway?
the DOJ protects its own. at the end of the day, nicky is a lawyer (his current legal status not withstanding). They couldn't ignore the blatant fuckery he was doing which is why he was charged, but do you really think that anybody else who wasn't on the inside, even as loosely as balldo is would get the soft treatment he did? Anybody else would have completely lost custody of their children, would have gotten closer to 10 years than 5, and not have their sentence suspended. For fucks sake, he had enough party drugs in that house to fuel a week-long orgy in a hollywood mansion, and his kids tested positive for having them in their system, plus all the guns and booze sitting out in the open within reach of the children and the general mess of a state the house was in. There is absolutely no good reason they went easy on him, they did so because he is/was one of them, however loosely.What I want to know is what profits Kandiyohi County going to the mat over the body cam footage? The taxpayers are going to have to pay to defend the lawsuit and if they lose they will have to pay for the plaintiffs side of things too.
Is saving Nick from embarrassment worth all of that?
Yeah, no.Imagine hating your children, your literal genetic legacy, little humans that you helped create, because they get in your way of partying.
I mean I guess I'd phrase it this way, if filing exhibits in support of a motion with the court isn't "presenting evidence" what term would you use to describe this action?Depends on what "presented" is interpreted to mean. If they're way off-base, and "presented" doesn't require a formal offer live in court, and excising certain exhibits from the record is improper, great!
Must be pandering to the pajeets.I made the mistake of looking at this XiaLand stream (during a late dinner) and they're telling stories about literally eating shit. Watch with caution.
How do you humiliate someone who's barely sentient anymore.Nick streaming with bikini whores isn't about prompting a divorce with Kayla, it's about humiliating Kayla.
Good thing we have the search warrant for his arrest that proves that the lying faggot is indeed a lying faggot.Nick claims that police intervention in his affairs was due to nothing related to drugs, but due to complaints for unspecified "other things."
He's a belligerent faggot that had no respect for the law or the people meant to uphold or enforce it. If you got in the way of his fun, he had 'clever' (for him) little names for you. Or apparently wishing death upon you via an STI. Even when he was practicing, he wasn't what I would refer to as a good lawyer.the DOJ protects its own. at the end of the day, nicky is a lawyer (his current legal status not withstanding). They couldn't ignore the blatant fuckery he was doing which is why he was charged, but do you really think that anybody else who wasn't on the inside, even as loosely as balldo is would get the soft treatment he did? Anybody else would have completely lost custody of their children, would have gotten closer to 10 years than 5, and not have their sentence suspended. For fucks sake, he had enough party drugs in that house to fuel a week-long orgy in a hollywood mansion, and his kids tested positive for having them in their system, plus all the guns and booze sitting out in the open within reach of the children and the general mess of a state the house was in. There is absolutely no good reason they went easy on him, they did so because he is/was one of them, however loosely.
this is their attempt to further prevent any embarrasment of the justice system by proxy. Although it's really transparent what they're doing, and enough details have come out so they look bad no matter what. They might as well just give up the sauce at this point.
Plenty of work for Hardin though. With a fat payday at the end if he wins. I would imagine this case is catnip for a lawyer whose practice was primarily about Freedon of Information. Between this and Monty's lawsuit I imagine Kandiyohi County is going to be seeing alot of Hardin the Hardship.the DOJ protects its own. at the end of the day, nicky is a lawyer (his current legal status not withstanding). They couldn't ignore the blatant fuckery he was doing which is why he was charged, but do you really think that anybody else who wasn't on the inside, even as loosely as balldo is would get the soft treatment he did? Anybody else would have completely lost custody of their children, would have gotten closer to 10 years than 5, and not have their sentence suspended. For fucks sake, he had enough party drugs in that house to fuel a week-long orgy in a hollywood mansion, and his kids tested positive for having them in their system, plus all the guns and booze sitting out in the open within reach of the children and the general mess of a state the house was in. There is absolutely no good reason they went easy on him, they did so because he is/was one of them, however loosely.
this is their attempt to further prevent any embarrasment of the justice system by proxy. Although it's really transparent what they're doing, and enough details have come out so they look bad no matter what. They might as well just give up the sauce at this point.
I am allergic to cats. I am a dog man.
Dogs are the superior quadruped. Fite me.Sorry, hate to say this, but you're a nigger.
Again, I think it's to spare the County embarrassment.What I want to know is what profits Kandiyohi County going to the mat over the body cam footage? The taxpayers are going to have to pay to defend the lawsuit and if they lose they will have to pay for the plaintiffs side of things too.
Is saving Nick from embarrassment worth all of that?