Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
I believe, Nuancebro might actually go by John, don't quote me on it, but I kinda wish I could be able to rewatch the Lauren Southern streams she did with him, because, I believe, at a certain point in one of them she refers to him by John.
I tried to go back for some of them years ago, as people in the thread didn't believe me that Nuancebro, at a certain point after the Better Discourse event, mentions how Lauren mysteriously disappeared for the rest of the night on him and Venti (because she went out drinking with Destiny, which is when he fell on the anthill).
The stream you are thinking about is this one

around 1:51:30 he talks about Karaoke and Lauren leaving.
 
Destiny has tried to villainize the forum to take heat off himself since this started

A forum known for not taking down compromising stuff and phonebookings

The plaintiff in the case requests the forum to take down stuff

Forum operator says "OK"

Destiny fights it

The headache inducing turns in this sequence of events are exhausting but he's basically trying to go full circle for 2 possible reasons.
He needs to keep villainizing the forum for either optics after this is over or as part of his legal strategy down the line OR, he just wants to spite the ho.
 
What is his angle here? Is it just to spite her? I don't get it. Why go out of his way to point this out?
Yes, he wants to inflict the maximum amount of pain and stress on her for filling a lawsuit in the first place.

Yeah buddy, the guy on twitter isn't really Nathan, he just, somehow, managed to get exclusive pictures that haven't been uploaded anywhere else, is followed by Destiny's footsoldiers, like The Guardsman
Original pictures and, as I archived a few pages ago, he hosted a twitter space from the account.
 
It’s always funny to watch dgg flail before they get their talking points from their edaddy and they all fall in line.

“Uh it’s a fake nathan posting nazi shit!” Yeah buddy I don’t think those are going to be your marching orders. Probably sit your jeet ass down at the call centre until destiny is able to cook up a giga genius logic brain reason why the most persuasive liberal on the internet has a nazi son.
 
The stream you are thinking about is this one

around 1:51:30 he talks about Karaoke and Lauren leaving.
Ah, thanks for posting this. Watching the section reminded me another of the reasons why I thought the guy she was seeing/dating was Nuancebro.

Similarly to when he started fucking Boze, Destiny started drinking because Lauren encouraged him to.

However, when Lauren started to lose interest in Destiny, her likes became less frequent, etc. She suddenly started talking about working out and stop drinking altogether, she didn't stick to it religiously, but it did imply an influence from the guy she was seeing.
Nuancebro being a non-drinker, and working out, it's actually something that she mentions quite a few times in their stream interactions, and even in twitter interactions if I'm not mistaken.

Her friendship with Nuancebro actually got her to start interacting with some of Solbrah's orbiters, if I'm not mistaken, and I believe that Solbrah himself.
Don't quote me on this, but I also believe that at a certain point she even followed David Laid (for the non stalkers, Nuancebro goes to the same gym David Laid goes to, or at least he did at a certain point)

Idk, I can definitely be convinced out of my Nuancebro position, but out of everyone I know, other than Destiny, Nuancebro was the only other guy I saw that was influencing her behaviour and people she interacted with in some way in her personal life.
But, just as likely, it could be that this "John" guy was simply a guy she met through her sister, or something, and he's offline, and was also a non-drinker and works out.

However, at the time when I was secretly alogging both of them, Destiny and Lauren, Nuancebro was the guy I personally believed was the other guy, and still do. You saw how angry the cuck got yesterday from my post.
 
Last edited:
wait what, when? what happened lmao
The retard got baited into posting another Rose picture. The context isn't as clear because mods merged it into one post.
But I made a post, making fun of Nuancebro cucking him, and he ran 10 minutes later to shit talk me in DGG, which is when I made the other post that started at these words:
LMAOOOOOOOOOOO @Latrell Sprewell @Code Cave IT ACTUALLY WORKED LMAO.

For context, Latrell and Code Cave (and others) told me to start making fun of his rape, and other things, to bait him into posting more info, and it worked lmao.

*Edit:
The proof that he's responding to that specific one, instead of the previous ones, is in the fact that he responds to the allegation that he was trying to present himself as the guy in the Rose picture, also, due to the proximity of when he started typing in his chat to when I posted.
I had been trying, multiple times, for him to take the bait yesterday. Only until I mentioned Lauren, and him getting cucked, is when he decided to take it, which makes me think that one got him angrier than the other ones.
 
Last edited:
The retard got baited into posting another Rose picture. The context isn't as clear because mods merged it into one post.
But I made a post, making fun of Nuancebro cucking him, and he ran 10 minutes later to shit talk me in DGG, which is when I made the other post that started at these words:


*Edit:
The proof that he's responding to that specific one, instead of the previous ones, is in the fact that he responds to the allegation that he was trying to present himself as the guy in the Rose picture, also, due to the proximity of when he started typing in his chat to when I posted.
I had been trying, multiple times, for him to take the bait yesterday. Only until I mentioned Lauren, and him getting cucked, is when he decided to take it, which makes me think that one got him angrier than the other ones.
I dont think he is John.
Also, maybe im wrong but at the end of july 2022 she told him the guy she was seeing broke with her because she was sexually abuse, was that john? because if that john then he is not NuanceBro
 
  • Like
Reactions: StrangerMe
Defendant Steven K. Bonnell’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Order to Compel Lolcow LLC to Remove Videos
This is a very interesting filing.
I particularly found this part to be interesting.

1748664770225.webp
Basically Destiny's lawyers didn't object for an order to compel Lolcow LLC until Pxie's lawyers asked for fees. Or at least that is basically what they said in this filing.

I don't know if it is a good idea to say well I basically agree to everything but this one part when we conferred but now I don't agree at all. It looks very two-faced. On the other hand I have no idea if not including the fees portion looks bad by Pxie's lawyers or if it is normal.

Briefly touching on fees. I have no idea if Pxie is asking for too much when she asks for fees. This is what Pxie's lawyers argued in her motion as to why they should be granted fees. The thing it references is just the Revenge Pornography law provisions that a victim may be awarded appropriate fees. But most of that part of the law looks like it is talking about the final judgement.
1748665252840.webp
Basically the theory behind why she should be awarded fees is that Destiny has not acted to have the videos taken down forcing Pxie to pay to have it done.

This is a reasonable argument in my opinion. If Pxie does have to pay to have this stuff taken down then that is money she can't spend on the rest of the lawsuit. Destiny is the one who allowed these videos to be leaked. It is fair to ask him to bear the monetary burden of having these videos taken down.

But I have no idea if Pxie can get fees for this or if that part of the law only applies to after the lawsuit is concluded. It doesn't help that this law is new. If I had to guess I might say that she will not be granted fees. But I am like 55 won't 45 will because I just have no idea what the legal precedent for this is.

What is his angle here? Is it just to spite her? I don't get it. Why go out of his way to point this out?
Yes, he wants to inflict the maximum amount of pain and stress on her for filling a lawsuit in the first place.

Could be that Destiny's lawyers are the one being duplicitous and agreed but found the opportunity to oppose this to make the lawsuit more expensive and difficult for Pxie. After all he could have done the same exact thing as Pxie and it would even be a reasonable defense in court.

Link for newcomers?
I actually don't think it is up right now.
 
I dont think he is John.
Also, maybe im wrong but at the end of july 2022 she told him the guy she was seeing broke with her because she was sexually abuse, was that john? because if that john then he is not NuanceBro
I would have to reread the leaks.

However, the solution that Code Cave suggested, and it's probably true, it's that Lauren could have simply hooked up with Nuancebro at a certain point, but that he's not the guy that she was talking about in the DMs, this "John".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Code Cave
I would have to reread the leaks.

However, the solution that Code Cave suggested, and it's probably true, it's that Lauren could have simply hooked up with Nuancebro at a certain point, but that he's not the guy that she was talking about in the DMs, this "John".
I actually think they hooked up after she "broke up" with Destiny,
Around september/october she went to the US and did some documentary stuff and went to see NuanceBro, im pretty sure she did a video shooting guns.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ANF and StrangerMe
I actually think they hooked up after she "broke up" with Destiny,
Around september/october she went to the US and did some documentary stuff and went to see NuanceBro, im pretty sure she did a video shooting guns.
Her normie bff also followed him on instagam, implying, he went to Canada to see her at a certain point.

I'm fairly certain they hooked up, I just don't know how serious it was, that's the thing that's debated in my mind. I don't think they are currently dating tho, and if they actually "dated" it was for a short period, imo.

Still, it makes Destiny seethe, or so it seems, so I will continue to mention it!

*Edit:
Anyways, probably going to disappear for a few days to lock in and search through Rockford. So if I don't respond to messages, that's why.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if it is a good idea to say well I basically agree to everything but this one part when we conferred but now I don't agree at all. It looks very two-faced. On the other hand I have no idea if not including the fees portion looks bad by Pxie's lawyers or if it is normal.
I understand their argument, but Pxie's lawyer explicitly brought up legal fees during the meet-and-confer. It's right there in the e-mail exchange he filed: "If your client would like to reimburse the Plaintiff for the legal fees she has incurred to date regarding the removal of the Video from Kiwi Farms, we would consider including the links to the videos of him in the proposed order." I guess I could see it coming across as duplicitous that she didn't include it in the draft motion she sent him, or that she did not explicitly say she was going to request the court to order attorney's fees, but for him to claim that he was "sandbagged" and that she never raised the issue seems a bit rich when she explicitly raised the issue in that email. And he didn't file his response to that email, but I suspect he declined to give them attorney's fees. The whole point of requiring a meet and confer is to see if the parties can resolve disputes without court involvement. If he wouldn't agree to reimburse attorney's fees in response to that request, of course he'd oppose any motion for attorney's fees. Asking the court to deny the motion for failing to meet and confer on a request that they already denied in correspondence rings a bit hollow to me, but I guess we'll see what the court says.

But I have no idea if Pxie can get fees for this or if that part of the law only applies to after the lawsuit is concluded. It doesn't help that this law is new. If I had to guess I might say that she will not be granted fees. But I am like 55 won't 45 will because I just have no idea what the legal precedent for this is.
I think its quite possible the court either denies the motion without prejudice or just reserves ruling on it until the case is over.
 
Back