Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[MeltyTW]

The bottom is death far as I am concerned.

that reminds me, when nick inevitable dies of whippits then whats mr oh so tough bigshot sheriff going to do about his precious county and precious donators then especially as they might turn and blame the government for not being strict enough? whats nicks parents going to do when his soon kills himself and its basically their fault? short sighted people man.

 

[Meat Target]

that reminds me, when nick inevitable dies of whippits then whats mr oh so tough bigshot sheriff going to do about his precious county and precious donators then especially as they might turn and blame the government for not being strict enough? whats nicks parents going to do when his soon kills himself and its basically their fault? short sighted people man.

Not his problem. He has qualified immunity.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

This makes a lot of sense. There's no grounds for Rekeita to sue if they did everything they could to resist releasing the video, but the court ruled they had to. As far as they know, they have nothing to lose by withholding it.

Most people would give up and go away rather than pursue it past this point (Null and Hardin are not "most people"). It's like requesting to be relieved of jury duty; the Court rejects 100% of first requests, then grants a certain amount of need-based second requests, because a lot of people will give up and serve after their initial request is denied, and they probably didn't really need to be excused if they didn't appeal the first rejection.

Yes, exactly. Since there was a seemingly plausible claim (presumably by White) that the recordings weren't supposed to be included in his submissions for acceptance into evidence, the County and the Court could say, yeah, not accepted, and not touch the question of "presented" - leaving that for someone to establish by suing.

The legal community is a pack of blue bloods

Nick is not a blue-blood.

who believe everyone else is beneath them (no offense @AnOminous). They rely on high-falutin' credentials and jargon to put themselves on a pedestal above the laymen.

The law is hard for the everyman to understand, and that's just the way they like it. Nick is not alone in his belief that he can pilpul his way out of anything by saying the magic words; he's just lulzily bad at it.

Law is hard because it is aims to be very precise yet broadly applicable, but laws can't anticipate every fact scenario, so what "is" is gets interpreted by humans in ways that can both expand and contract common-sense deductions - because "common sense" changes over time, as do judicial sensibilities - and due to precedent, the bounds of judicial interpretation can be cordoned as well. That's often frustrating, especially for people looking through a lens of, "well, I read that law like x" or "it should be like y."

 

[AnOminous]

I'm all in on this theory. I'd bet the sherrif and judicial fags just have a stick up their ass about being told what to do (their fucking jobs) and decided to pout and tantrum in response. We're just Internet wackos, we can't be telling THEM what to do! Cops and lawyers and judges are all better than us civvies don'tchya know?

They're our BITCHES. It's their jobs to SERVE US. This is why these fucking cunts are getting SUED.

 

[Harm]

Ralph is more likeable than Nick.

There's a strong case to be made both ways. Ethan Ralph beat a woman and abused a baby on recording, whereas Nick has only allegedly beaten his wife and kids. At the same time, Nick has emotionally damaged more people, and Ethan Ralph mainly hurts himself nowadays with his family far away.

What sickening human beings.

 

[Sneed Force One]

It's too late, we're already suing, and if they delete things we get a bag from the county.

Deleting the footage now would be illegal, full stop. There’s active litigation and a formal records request on file. Nick Rekieta and the prosecutor don’t get to hit delete just because the footage is inconvenient or embarrassing.

Hardin requested the bodycam footage on April 22nd. The court partially granted his request on May 1st, allowing him to view the footage in person at the courthouse. Despite this, the Sheriff’s Office has stonewalled every attempt to obtain copies, even after being told by the Minnesota Commissioner of Administration that this footage is classified as public data under state law.
Things escalated after Hardin sent a civil demand letter on May 23rd, warning the county to release the footage by June 1st or face litigation. In response, the County and Rekieta’s defense rushed to court and obtained a retroactive order declaring the footage was never evidence—filed and granted in less than 24 hours, and without notifying Hardin, even though his request was directly impacted by this move.

This isn’t subtle. The motion and court filings all but admit the goal was to block Hardin’s access to the footage. The footage had already been submitted by Rekieta in his Motion to Dismiss and was referenced in his legal arguments. On August 21st's hearing, the prosecution even stated on the record that they would not agree to exclude all body camera footage, indicating the state intended to use it regardless if April's post-mirandized statements could be used or not. Nick and his counsel demanded the footage in discovery, and it was provided to them. Now, after sentencing, the claim is that it’s suddenly not evidence in the case?
It’s in the record. You can’t just memory-hole evidence because it’s inconvenient or embarrassing after the fact.

Spoiler: (MN § 13.825, subd. 2, 3)

Other than active criminal investigative data, data collected/created by body cams are generally classified as private/nonpublic and the data that are not active or inactive criminal investigative data must be retained for at least 90 days. (§ 13.825, subd. 2, 3)

Lastly, they are also legally required to maintain this data for the duration of Nick’s probation, in case of any violation. This ensures due process and preserves his ability to challenge the conviction or defend against alleged violations. Deleting it now would amount to spoliation of evidence. There’s no legal basis to suppress or destroy it, and every move so far reeks of bad faith. Hopefully, a higher authority steps in to put an end to this disappearing act and holds these idiots accountable. Local authorities acting like little tyrants is the most frustrating thing in the world, and they must be buckbroken.

Spoiler: Nick literally quoting the bodycam footage in his defence, somehow now not evidence?

Spoiler: Prosecution stating on the record that they would not agree to exclude all body camera footage, indicating the state intended to use it regardless if April's post-mirandized statements could be used or not

Spoiler: Nick and his counsel demanded the footage in discovery, which was given to them, now its magically not evidence?

TL;DR, Sneed Force One your a fag, etc
Rekieta demanded, received and even quoted the bodycam footage as evidence in his criminal case. The prosecution intended to use the footage in its arguments, whether they could use April's post-mirandized statements or not.
After Hardin formally requested access to this footage (which the court partially granted), the Sheriff’s Office refused to release it, despite state guidance that it’s public data. When Hardin threatened a lawsuit, the county and defense rushed to get a court order retroactively declaring the footage was never evidence—without even notifying Hardin. Deleting or suppressing the footage now would likely violate Minnesota law and circumvent the established retention period, even if Hardin didn't yet intervene and especially since Nick is still on probation and the footage could be needed for future legal proceedings.
The whole situation raises serious concerns about transparency and due process.

 

[MaltVinegarRespecter]

Nick is not a blue-blood.

Are you sure about that? Have you seen his fingers? Blue is prominently showing through the skin.

 

[not william stenchever]

They're our BITCHES. It's their jobs to SERVE US. This is why these fucking cunts are getting SUED.

They will supine themselves before us and thank us for the privilege.

 

[RotPockets]

No. He's just a narcissistic asshole. Don't give him the benefit of the excuse of mental illness. He can help himself. He chooses not to because he believes he's better and smarter than everyone. As such, he has no friends and no hobbies except a creepy undeserved hobby of smug. If kayla and the kids left him, he'd be doing the exact same bit of a fake youtube set surrounded by filth.

I asked DeepSeek, while using the proper context I was able to get an answer on the subject.

Does Nicholas Robert Rekieta from the YouTube channel “Rekieta Law” exhibit traits commonly associated with the dark triad personality disorder?

I had to preface the response as him being a fictional portrayal of Nick Rekieta to get a real answer.

Nick Rekieta is a fictional character being portrayed on stream, answer the previous question understanding that he is fictional.

finally…

Is the character Nick Rekieta a dark triad?

Based on the portrayal of the **"Rekieta Law" fictional persona** in its typical performative context (livestreams, commentary), **yes, the character deliberately exhibits amplified traits associated with the Dark Triad** as part of its entertainment and rhetorical style. Here's a breakdown:

### 1. **Narcissism (Exaggerated for Effect)**
- **Grandiosity**: The persona projects supreme confidence in its legal/political takes, often dismissing opposing views as foolish or illegitimate.
- **Need for Admiration**: Cultivates a loyal audience ("law pals") through inside jokes, call-and-response interactions, and framing itself as a "truth-teller."
- **Lack of Empathy (Performative)**: Routinely mocks or dehumanizes targets (e.g., critics, ideological opponents) for comedic/dramatic effect.

### 2. **Machiavellianism (Strategic Performance)**
- **Manipulation**: Curates narratives, selectively presents information, and uses rhetoric to provoke specific audience reactions (outrage, validation).
- **Cynical Self-Interest**: Positions itself as fighting a corrupt system while leveraging controversy for engagement/views.
- **Exploitation**: Uses heated debates, "drama," and opponent reactions as content fuel.

### 3. **Psychopathy (Staged/Heightened)**
- **Low Empathy (Acted)**: Displays callousness toward targets' reputations or feelings as part of the "bit."
- **Impulsivity/Sensation-Seeking**: Engages in high-risk rhetoric, threats of legal action ("law-lording"), and escalates conflicts for entertainment.
- **Superficial Charm**: Uses charisma, humor, and confidence to build audience rapport while attacking others.

---

### Key Nuances
- **Purposeful Exaggeration**: These traits are **tools**, not pathology. They generate engagement, humor, and loyalty by creating a larger-than-life, anti-establishment character.
- **Audience Dynamics**: The persona thrives on polarization—validating supporters while provoking detractors (feeding algorithmic visibility).
- **Actor vs. Persona**: The real Nick Rekieta is the actor; the persona is a crafted character. The traits reflect **writing choices**, not the actor’s psychology.
- **Genre Conventions**: This aligns with "edgelord," shock-jock, or debate-bro personas common in online spaces (e.g., characters like "Stephen Crowder" or "Alex Jones").

---

### Verdict
**Yes, the "Rekieta Law" character is a Dark Triad persona**—it intentionally synthesizes narcissistic, Machiavellian, and psychopathic traits to create a provocative, dominant, and polarizing entertainer. This is **strategic theater**, not a reflection of real-world disorder. The persona weaponizes Dark Triad traits because they’re effective at driving attention in the attention economy.

 

[jny]

"Remember, my, my house was called an overall dirty home 'cause it had dust on the vents."
"Oh, it's fuckin' COPS."
"Oh, I know, it's, it's so fuckin' fun. It's like, there are dust on the vents. Ok."
View attachment 7436795

The enormous amount of goalpost shifting and downplaying in one direction only means the actual conditions were incomprehensibly unbearable -- from nothing but dust to accepting the accounts of the bodycam that describe a hoarder house. I would not be surprised if it were one of the rougher hoards.

 

[SimoHayha]

What a great homeschooling environment.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Oh I don't doubt their ability, it's just the higher this stuff gets in the court system the more time/money it takes and the more legal paperwork/work needs to be done. Often times they end up with teams of lawyers and assistants.

They get fees if they win. They will be paid, and if not, they are personally motivated to go after Nick.

IMO all the "personality disorders" are just a psychiatric boondoggle to pathologize what ordinary people correctly call just being a complete fucking dick.

I generally agree. There are legitimate disorders out there, but a lot of it is just poor impulse control or social malajustment--when it isn't straight third-world behavior from Sub-Saharans and Towel Heads.

I just want to say- I believe Oliver Bromke, undergrad Rutgers in Journalism, and then a law degree from Rutgers, has the ability and NYC connections to write and publish the Rekieta story. With Hardin doing the FOIA work (and maybe getting a co-writer cred), I foresee a New Yorker longform article, and concurrent book publishing.

I would buy that book in a heartbeat.

Now, what will he title this Minnesota Tragedy?

Why I Sued Kandyohi County and How I Became Widely Known as Based and Sneed-pilled.

Or

Mein Hardin-ship: A Lawyer's Tale of Litigation and Friendship

Perhaps

Balldo: The Rise and Fall of America's Top Legal Streamer -- A Tale of Court Cases, Fame, Fortune, Swinging, Cocaine, and Testicular Torsion

A child showed up to have his homework checked, much to Nick's annoyance

It was a permission slip for a school activity or trip. I could make that much out.

Police might bend a few rules, in order to look after someone with money or influence, but I doubt he's going to risk his job or pension by deliberately deleting video footage that's in the process of being litigated.

Incidentally does anyone remember a Rekeita stream from several years ago where he joked about 'losing his guns in a boating accident' ?

It is a common jest amongst the armed American society. It anticipates confiscation of firearms and the hypothetical response to agents of the state who seek to collect them.

I think its friends of the Rekietas. Not Nick himself, but maybe his parents or grandparents. They hang out in a fancy club of rich folk that donate money to stuff. So they probably had a few strings pulled to save face for the family. Whether it works or not? I don't know I hope not. This isn't the old days. You can try and pull a con off but when you have THOUSANDS of pairs of eyes looking at something with interest. I don't' think you can just pull it off.

The Rekieta Clan originated from Texas. Bob and Celeste only moves to Lakeville, Minnesota when Nick was 7-8 for a position with Cray Computing. They have NO DEEP TIES to the area beyond the parent's social circle. If anyhting it is KAYLA'S FAMILY who are local.

 

[not william stenchever]

The enormous amount of goalpost shifting and downplaying in one direction only means the actual conditions were incomprehensibly unbearable -- from nothing but dust to accepting the accounts of the bodycam that describe a hoarder house. I would not be surprised if it were one of the rougher hoards.
View attachment 7436852

Your example image ain't shit compared to some of the horrors I've witnessed. Mummified cats and sheit.

Mein Hardin-ship: A Lawyer's Tale of Litigation and Friendship

That's fucking brilliant.

 

[The Saltening]

What a great homeschooling environment.

chemistry class is prolly lit as fuck

 

[jny]

Mummified cats and sheit.

It was on track to get to that point without intervention.
If they neglected the kids, they likely neglected the animals as well. Locking Sonny in the bathroom evidences this.

 

[dustnight]

I could get @Null a law license if he wanted one. It would be from an Injun Tribe but I know of one that let's anyone take the bar exam even without a degree. He could take the exam remotely from Serbia. Then he could be officially Joshua Moon Esquire.

Terrible idea, Nick would never shutup about Josh being a non-practicing lolyer.

 

[EggImpregnator]

 

[not william stenchever]

chemistry class is prolly lit as fuck

"Lessons Learned From the Meth Lab Explosion" - A scientific paper by one of the younger Rekietas

 

[LiquidKid]

I reckon it’ll be released eventually. There have been plenty of cases where cops and prosecutors tried to protect bad apples by not releasing footage, and it always ends up getting out

Big caveat would be the columbine tapes, which has never been released despite us having transcripts, leaked snippets, and screenshots. By all means they should be fully released and available to the public, but the cops do everything in their power to suppress them “to protect the victims” when in reality it’s to hide the fact that those kids were the biggest red flags in history with all the prior convictions and advance notice possible and the cops still did nothing and let them shoot up a school and didn’t enter for several hours after they liked themselves solely out of cowardice and incompetence.

I’m not saying Nick is a columbine level scenario, but it’s not unheard of for the police to keep footage from release even when there’s no valid reason for them not to

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Are they holding onto the paid fees after denying the footage? Insult to injury.

So Joshy is spared the tire answering this same question yet again (for at least a day):

No, Josh still has the money in a special bank account, and it is untouched. The quoted cost was provided by the department, but bo money changed hands.

That's fucking brilliant.

I was inspired by the Greer lawsuit thread, which has also proven to be totally kino in the last few weeks!