Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

I mean he left bottles out everywhere filled with booze. There’s a nonzero chance one of the kids grabbed one and took a sip to be like daddy.

And he made up the dumb claim that the nanny gave one of them a "sip" of white claw... He can only make such a lie up if he's fully convinced the bodycam won't eventually get out.
Which'll make it all the funnier when it does.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

This isn't typical drug using parent stuff. This is crackhouse stuff.

It's especially "funny " that Nick was trying to pin the nanny (not April) on stealing booze or giving his kids booze. Nigga, she probably cleaned up and threw out some of the half-empties laying on the fucking floor all over the house.

For sure the kids have tried booze, because they leave it EVERYWHERE. Countertops, floor, bathroom, balldo bunker, it's everywhere.

The cocaine powder is bad, but the booze too? Not great for kids to have such easy access. And all they had to do to get it, was pick a bottle off the floor or the counter.
Edit: spelling

 

[Canard]

I think i hate nicks simps a little bit more than I hate him. They will defend this faggot for actually putting his kids through this shit and call people disgusted by it "weird". Nick and Kayla are horrible parents and at most the only one probably trying to be better is Kayla. Nick has no regrets for what he did because HE enjoyed the debauchery and he won't ever see himself in the wrong because his little cult just pats his ass

What I hate with those simps that there is nothing even to protect. Nick provides nothing of value or actual interest. His shows are now rambling trash. His political opinions are nothing special or even well presented or founded. His content output is net-negative.

Only slightly valuable thing is to provide view of downfall of just how deep can man go. And that man does not even have any reason to be broken. There is nothing to simp for...

 

[thebigdream]

You forgot that he also has openly stated that he resented *his* parents for not being more open regarding their sex lives to him when he was young.

I'd never thought about this point properly before (mostly because it was an extremely weird thing of him to say), but it now makes me wonder what there was for his parents to open up about? If they had a relatively normal sex life, surely there'd be nothing for them to share with him since most people expect their parents to be having sex, or wouldn't find it revelatory if they were told. I don't want to read too much into it, but I think it lends credence to them being swingers. Not that anyone who's seen Celeste's crazy eyes has thought otherwise...

 

[demicolon]

@neger psykolog I get posting about the side effects of these drugs but posting about your own twenty hour gooning experiences is a bit much.

Just sit back and laugh. If Rekieta motivated people to drop the bottle then people ITT posting about their gooning phases might motivate people to moderate their "ADHD" medications.

 

[AnOminous]

Excellent. The public will wear him out completely. All his daily metabolic reserves will be wiped out worrying about these randos, and his cocktail of pharma drugs and seething will keep him from restorative sleep, thus further diminishing his immune response.

I like that he's getting buckbroken on a near hourly basis by totally random nobodies with a dozen followers and can't quit responding to all these clowns like Patrick Tomlinson. What a complete loser.

 

[WhoDaresWhoCaresWhoKnows]

Maybe I’m missing something obvious here, but why did the police quote Null a figure for the body cam footage at all? For the footage to be used in court at all it would have to be edited and minors redacted, right? And I doubt anyone had to do much work to make the footage available for viewing at the court house.

Was this just the police telling Null to go away without saying it? It just doesn’t make sense that they’d need $5k+ to pay for editing, redacting, etc, when it’s work they do anyway to prepare it for court.

Use of bodycam footage as evidence in a criminal trial is different than release of bodycam footage as a public record. But that said, if it was used as evidence in court and then requested after use in court by any person.....what was provided to that person would have to be redacted.

Okay, so was the footage at the court house redacted? If so, who did it, and who paid for it?

The bottom line is that the quoted price is nonsensical. The footage is either presented in court, and therefore free to the public, or it isn’t presented as evidence and therefore practically impossible to access. The only situation where it’d make sense to pay is if the police department would like to release it but doesn’t want to spend the resources redacting the footage. But in this case, the police department (or sheriff’s office, whatever) doesn’t want to release it. So why quote a price on the body cam footage?

@Tiki Bar Man 2 was the footage redacted at the courthouse?

Since Nicholas entered a plea deal instead of doing a full legal battle I would guess that only a small amount of the bodycam footage, if any, got edited and censored at all. Since he plead and got probation there was no longer any reason to edit and censor any more footage and just as a cost saving measure it would not be done unless something made it necessary to do so.

Remember that Minnesota is also very backwards in terms of how they handle bodycam footage and Candied Yoshi is a backwater town in that kind of of state. This means that processing fees to edit and censor things like bodycam is very much in their interest to further stymie access to it but there are more causes. To further explain the reason for the fees, yes, the Minnesotan courts still have a duty to make records accessible to the public unless some other interest overrides that duty.

The problem lies in what is considered ''accessible to the public'' here. Technically, on the most technical level, having access to court records only at Minnesotan courthouses on their internal systems, while supervised by court personnel, is considered ''accessible to the public'' since anyone technically could travel to a Minnesotan courthouse and request specific records and accessing records outside of this method can be challenged and delayed to the point of needing a lawyer to get anywhere.

This means that they do not have to censor and edit everything but only the things used for full court proceedings or requested to be accessed/released outside of the system as viewing things in a closed system while in a courthouse, often under supervision of court personnel, has different requirements to releasing a full video redacted and edited only to protect minors and such.

Since the average person would not bother travelling out of their way to a Minnesota courthouse just to see things like the state of a druggie hoarder-den, most evidence would only receive the bare minimum processing since no one is going to request or receive it.

 

[Penguin Soldier]

I'd never thought about this point properly before (mostly because it was an extremely weird thing of him to say), but it now makes me wonder what there was for his parents to open up about? If they had a relatively normal sex life, surely there'd be nothing for them to share with him since most people expect their parents to be having sex, or wouldn't find it revelatory if they were told. I don't want to read too much into it, but I think it lends credence to them being swingers. Not that anyone who's seen Celeste's crazy eyes has thought otherwise...

I've always interrupted it as Nick wanting them to not be private about having sex and do it openly/around him so he could "learn" or so sex "wouldn't have a stigma" to him. At least, that would be his cope/answer when pressed on it. The fact we know he is a cuck now gives away what the real meaning is, he wanted to watch because it sexually excited him.

I'd also be remiss not also point the implications this would have towards his feelings and relationship with his mother. Ya know, the one who clearly favors him as the golden child, gives him her prescriptions, bails him out of trouble...

 

[Overwritten Tapes]

It's especially "funny " that Nick was trying to pin the nanny (not April) on stealing booze or giving his kids booze. Nigga, she probably cleaned up and threw out some of the half-empties laying on the fucking floor all over the house.

For sure the kids have tried booze, because they leave it EVERYWHERE. Countertops, floor, bathroom, balldo bunker, it's everywhere.

The cocaine powder is bad, but the booze too? Not great for kids to have such easy access. And all they had to do to get it, was pick a bottle off the floor or the counter.
Edit: spelling

Reminds me of a time when I was 13 or 14, and my brother showed me a bottle of Jim beam in the fridge and told me not to touch it.

When he went out later that night, I snuck shots every 5 minutes until I was blacked out. I almost died that night.

How his kids aren't alcoholics like him is surprising.

 

[Soapmore]

I'd never thought about this point properly before (mostly because it was an extremely weird thing of him to say), but it now makes me wonder what there was for his parents to open up about? If they had a relatively normal sex life, surely there'd be nothing for them to share with him since most people expect their parents to be having sex, or wouldn't find it revelatory if they were told. I don't want to read too much into it, but I think it lends credence to them being swingers. Not that anyone who's seen Celeste's crazy eyes has thought otherwise...

You make too much of it. Nick just wanted a little insight from his mom & dad on how to mentally and emotionally ruin a woman so you don't have to grow into a competent man, same as the rest of us.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

How his kids aren't alcoholics like him is surprising.

That is not a safe assumption at this point.

 

[Fapcop]

The current Nick angle is to call everyone a psychopath, say they are obsessed.

Nick should be thankful we’re just mildly interested and not actually obsessed.

Because if we were, there’d be a caravan of cars heading to Spicer in order to spit on Nick or give him a knuckle sandwich.

Good point, I should have been more clear on that. I think the house declined when Nick discovered DRUGS. You are right, some of the cleanest homes I've ever seen were owned by coke heads and their dealers. You can't sleep... why not clean?

I want to push that a little.

Yeah, you go to SOME coke or amphetamine addicts house, and it’s spotless and he/she’s cleaning the counters one more time because he can still feel that sweet dopamine hit and it feels better when you’re DOING something.

Other come addicts just sit in their own filth and take line after line and pipe hit after pipe hit.

Simultaneously you can find heroin junkies who’ve never stolen anything their entire life, or weed smokers who make a living out of shop lifting.

Drugs don’t fundamentally change who you are.

If you’ve always been an asshole, you’re going to be a bigger asshole.

Nick was always a piece of shit at heart.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

2. The bodycam footage can now be deleted without further consideration as the 90 days for preservation of unused bodycam has long since passed.

No. For the umpteenth time:

What happens to the exhibits that I upload into MNDES and do not use?

Exhibits that you upload and do not offer to the court as evidence remain in MNDES until the retention period for all exhibits in the case is reached. You can request an exhibit in pre-hearing status be deleted any time before it is offered to the court during a hearing. To do so, submit a deletion request from the portal. Court staff review deletion requests. Requests that are approved will process within 24 hours. If your request is denied, you will receive an email with a reason for the denial.​

Also note that this guidance distinguishes between uploading exhibits and offering evidence.

 

[JustStopDude]

I don't really follow this drama, but if you're wondering why she "got off scot-free" it's because she didn't talk to the cops. Never talk to the cops without your attorney present. There is absolutely nothing you're going to say that will help your defense. Exercise your right to remain silent and then confer with your representation. Especially if you know you're guilty. This is just an object lesson.

There are always factors when it comes to both parents getting arrested. US states loath putting kids into the foster care system because of how much that costs the state. They typically will try to not slam both parents unless they are both so heavily involved in the illegal activity. And like you said, Nick the lawyer, did every fucking thing wrong possible as a suspect. He may have well just done a line of blow in front of the cops and then offered to let them bump a line.

I honestly think that if Nick had said nothing, he was still cooked, just because of how stupid and careless he had gotten. But yeah, the cops pretty much were gifted an open and shut case.

If he was a dealer I imagine they would have found a lot more in his house, he probably did play dealer to his little friend circle though, we all know about his power point presentations about why 'doing drugs is totally okay guys seriously' and I wouldn't be surprised if he had this "i got the hook up guys" attitude

Exactly. For some reason, people tend to think there is a clean divide between users and dealers. That is never the case. You got to go pretty high up the food chain to find a distributor who isn't an addict.

And even a crack whore on the corner knows a connection and will facilitate an exchange for a finder's fee.

I think Nick might realize (some) of his mistakes in moments of lucidity, he's just too proud to admit it.

Getting sober means he has to deal with a confront what he did to himself, his wife, and his kids, without the benefit of being in a drug fueled haze.

Yeah...he ain't doing that.

As someone who grew up with a father who loved to do drugs around his kids I can tell you with certainty "we kept it away from the kids", even if that is true and he wasn't having her do 8-balls to cure her ADHD, probably manifested as 'lightly cover it up by maybe going to the bathroom or another room then forgetting to put it away because blasted out of my fucking gourd.'

Im pretty sure I accidentally ingested crack cocaine at least a half a dozen times as a kid. You don't even have to worry about it being out in the open. My folks would hide it in really dumb places.

Fuck, Nick is depressing. These kids are fucked.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

You can't sleep... why not clean?

Those people didn’t have Twitter and endless online feuds to keep them occupied.

 

[Obsul]

I know this is empty moralfagging, I know this is a Captain Obvious statement, I don't care. I really, sincerely, strongly feel those kids need to be separated from him ASAP. He needs to go to prison. I say this as someone that suffered from an alcoholic parent for my entire childhood from birth to the age of 18. His mentality and behaviors heavily match my experience of the alcoholic parent I dealt with. My childhood was ruined, by someone very similar to him in his behavior. I know what this does to kids. He needs to go to prison. No matter what happens, those kids are going to be permanently marked by this, but the damage would be a lot less if he was removed from them.

 

[AnOminous]

I'm now 100% convinced this retard is liking his own tweets.

Lmao, just like Russell Greer. Pathetic.

 

[Nana_Feeder]

Strange reply. Nick Rekieta and people of his moral inclination are not welcome in my home. As for your view of Texans we can disagree. The place has been changing, and the people I'm familiar with would ostracize a character like Nick, but then that's true of good people anywhere.

"Old" Texas has more than its share of cucks and "the lifestyle".

 

[WhoDaresWhoCaresWhoKnows]

No. For the umpteenth time:



Also note that this guidance distinguishes between uploading exhibits and offering evidence.

Please understand, I am not saying this is the correct legal method or process to exclude evidence or have records deleted, I am saying that this is their gambit to subvert that process.

 

[Scorpion From MK]

(https://archive.is/zf1xA)


(https://archive.is/SobKC)


(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/FdcYl)
He retweeted the second tweet in the above screenshot.


(https://archive.is/jvn2E)