Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 156 40.4%

  • Total voters
    386
...I apologise if this seems late, but can I just clarify something, because the whole bodycam discussion is too much to catch up on -

What is the goal of obtaining the bodycam footage that everything else, from Nick himself, to his plea deal, to the police testimony, the forensic results, to these transcripts, don't otherwise provide? Is it to achieve some legal objective, or are we looking for something specific that Nick is being manipulative about or that the police didn't note? Is it just the final confirmation? Is it just on principle?

Because while Nick was entitled to think he was shielded from criticism, his bitterness on our 'standards' is at least explicable, because Hardin is intervening on our behalf in his case, a guy we used to consider a friend of the forum, and make a case to change the applicability of private and public footage for something he does not want shown - which yes, may include further embarrassing his children, as he so often says - but is also against the site's usual ethos. Whether he deserves it or not, I can't blame him for thinking it's personal.
One of the goals is to catch Nicholas out in his ever-growing web of lies that he has spun to protect himself from the consequences of abusing his children, pets, and ''wife''. There is also the issue where he has subverted the legal process in an attempt to hide what by any and all considerations was and should continue to be publicly available court records in a court case with a massive public interest that deserves the opportunity to receive the same kind of coverage and scrutiny he applied to the court records and legal battles of other people.

Nicholas is not a special little boy who did nothing wrong with the exclusive right to bend courts and laws to his favor, he is just a jumped up druggie who should start piecing his life together.
 
...I apologise if this seems late, but can I just clarify something, because the whole bodycam discussion is too much to catch up on -

What is the goal of obtaining the bodycam footage that everything else, from Nick himself, to his plea deal, to the police testimony, the forensic results, to these transcripts, don't otherwise provide? Is it to achieve some legal objective, or are we looking for something specific that Nick is being manipulative about or that the police didn't note? Is it just the final confirmation? Is it just on principle?

Because while Nick was entitled to think he was shielded from criticism, his bitterness on our 'standards' is at least explicable, because Hardin is intervening on our behalf in his case, a guy we used to consider a friend of the forum, and make a case to change the applicability of private and public footage for something he does not want shown - which yes, may include further embarrassing his children, as he so often says - but is also against the site's usual ethos. Whether he deserves it or not, I can't blame him for thinking it's personal.
Nick lied to us all about who he was. We were his adoring fans. We looked up to him. He betrayed us.

If the truth will destroy him, then he deserves it. And he's fighting the footage being released because it provides an unbiased narrative he can't control. Few things make a narcissist shriek bloody murder more reliably than that.

So yes, Nick: this IS about personal animosity. I DO want bad things to happen to you, because you are a selfish, treacherous, vindictive, evil little chicken-necked bastard.
 
Last edited:
I'm looking forward to Nick's views/tips being way higher than normal, much like any DSP Emergency stream.

In similar fashion, he'll immediately assume this means he's Corrected the Record and Owned the Trolls and that everyone loves him again now (no matter how many hate tips he gets).

Smug and secure in his success, he will become more baffled and hostile as each 'normal' stream after gets even lower engagement, unable to understand that his drama chasing only alienated further people.

I do agree with others its going to be a hyper specific showcase of his ability to zero in on minutia nobody cares about to try and prove the notes wrong without actually disagreeing with any of the parts people care about (ie: you cant see the night stand from some angles while ignoring things like 'the kitchen was all fucked up with empty bottles everywhere).

Over/under 10 total photos shown?
 
...I apologise if this seems late, but can I just clarify something, because the whole bodycam discussion is too much to catch up on -

What is the goal of obtaining the bodycam footage that everything else, from Nick himself, to his plea deal, to the police testimony, the forensic results, to these transcripts, don't otherwise provide? Is it to achieve some legal objective, or are we looking for something specific that Nick is being manipulative about or that the police didn't note? Is it just the final confirmation? Is it just on principle?

Nick has made multiple statements that the body worn camera footage can clear up. He has stated:

- Drugs were never in the presence of children

- Evidence (2 oz. [sic] of drugs, namely) disappeared from his house after the search by police.

- Stated that 'you never know what police bring into your house', insinuating malfeasance

- Stated the lead detective, Pomplum, had a personal vendetta against him

- April's rights were violated in her interview

- Kayla and April were both denied access to their lawyer (Nick)

- Said he has footage to PROVE that a police officer touched his child's hair with a Cobain listed glove

- Said that the police expressed envy at his house

- Implied wrong doing and conspiracy by the local law enforcement

- Assured that the house was not a total wreck.

Among many other statements that can be easily proven or not by the body camera footage.

Because while Nick was entitled to think he was shielded from criticism, his bitterness on our 'standards' is at least explicable, because Hardin is intervening on our behalf in his case, a guy we used to consider a friend of the forum, and make a case to change the applicability of private and public footage for something he does not want shown

No one gains immunity by curating favour with the Farms. Indeed, if anything, many here were OVERLY deferential to Nick over time and only relatively recently did opinion shift. Null himself was hesitant to cover Nick until he actively became antagonistic.

Fairness for all, and Nick got more benefit of thr doubt than most.

- which yes, may include further embarrassing his children, as he so often says - but is also against the site's usual ethos. Whether he deserves it or not, I can't blame him for thinking it's personal.

We have explicitly requested his children be censored from exposure to a more widespread audience.

Any damage in their lives is ultimately larger in their local community and id a direct result of local gossip.
 
...I apologise if this seems late, but can I just clarify something, because the whole bodycam discussion is too much to catch up on -

What is the goal of obtaining the bodycam footage that everything else, from Nick himself, to his plea deal, to the police testimony, the forensic results, to these transcripts, don't otherwise provide? Is it to achieve some legal objective, or are we looking for something specific that Nick is being manipulative about or that the police didn't note? Is it just the final confirmation? Is it just on principle?

Because while Nick was entitled to think he was shielded from criticism, his bitterness on our 'standards' is at least explicable, because Hardin is intervening on our behalf in his case, a guy we used to consider a friend of the forum, and make a case to change the applicability of private and public footage for something he does not want shown - which yes, may include further embarrassing his children, as he so often says - but is also against the site's usual ethos. Whether he deserves it or not, I can't blame him for thinking it's personal.
At this point it is two-fold, it's the principle of the thing, but moreover it's the legality.
The law says the public is entitled to it, full stop.
The fact that it's not been released, is indicative of corruption. It's illegal.
At first we just wanted it to laugh at it, of course, but now it's a matter of not allowing officials to just break the fucking law because this fucking nepobaby has rich mommy and daddy who know the prosecutor (allegedly).

It's funny how Nick rants about the state breaking the law until it's in his favor.
 
I'm looking forward to Nick's views/tips being way higher than normal, much like any DSP Emergency stream.

In similar fashion, he'll immediately assume this means he's Corrected the Record and Owned the Trolls and that everyone loves him again now (no matter how many hate tips he gets).

Smug and secure in his success, he will become more baffled and hostile as each 'normal' stream after gets even lower engagement, unable to understand that his drama chasing only alienated further people.

I do agree with others its going to be a hyper specific showcase of his ability to zero in on minutia nobody cares about to try and prove the notes wrong without actually disagreeing with any of the parts people care about (ie: you cant see the night stand from some angles while ignoring things like 'the kitchen was all fucked up with empty bottles everywhere).

Over/under 10 total photos shown?
I think under 10 and half of them will be too close up to show the real conditions of the house
 
It would be so incredibly hilarious if this whole situation ends up exposing a massive corruption and pay-to-play network in the state and county government. Image your decades old racket getting exposed to the light of day because some druggie belonged to a wealthy family and they didn't want his crack den exposed to the public.

You've heard of the Streisand effect? Get ready for the Rekieta effect. When a graft and corruption scheme gets exposed because of the attempt to cover for their most incompetent and retarded participant.
 
Oxyfuel welding uses a combination of pure Oxygen and Acetylene to produce a flame to melt the metal without electricity, but that's largely been replaced with other processes.
Nick should try huffing acetylene btw. Smells... lovely. Not at all like rotten eggs. And very much NOT combustible.
 
It would be so incredibly hilarious if this whole situation ends up exposing a massive corruption and pay-to-play network in the state and county government. Image your decades old racket getting exposed to the light of day because some druggie belonged to a wealthy family and they didn't want his crack den exposed to the public.
And at the center of this web is the dentist.
Nick should try huffing acetylene btw. Smells... lovely. Not at all like rotten eggs. And very much NOT combustible.
1748814203396.webp
"Haha. I'm in danger."
 
What if the nine year old was drinking out of Rickety Rackets extra-special whiskey? Not to say they couldn't have just been snorting it, but ingestion via liquor seems equally likely to me, given what is now known from the body cam notes.
I'm not a chemist so take this with a pinch of salt, but I don't think that's it. Because she didn't test positive for cocaethylene:
He thinks he's exonerated because "a few metabolites are missing":
  • Methylecgonine is found when cocaine is smoked.
  • Cocaethylene is found when cocaine is used alongside alcohol.
  • Norcocaine is a minor metabolite that's only found among heavy users, ones that use it at least several times a week, if not daily.
  • Ortho-hydroxycocaine is found when hair samples are exposed to peroxide. (He stashed peroxide based washing liquids under his sink it seems.)
Basically he wants a pat on the back because at least his daughter didn't smoke crack, down a bottle of whisky while she's at it, did so daily, and messed with household chemicals.
 
What is the goal of obtaining the bodycam footage that everything else, from Nick himself, to his plea deal, to the police testimony, the forensic results, to these transcripts, don't otherwise provide? Is it to achieve some legal objective, or are we looking for something specific that Nick is being manipulative about or that the police didn't note? Is it just the final confirmation? Is it just on principle?
That's a good question, and the answer can be inferred from both Nick's perspective on one hand, and from the perspective of the people who want the footage out.

Nick is terrified of this footage coming out because he knows that it will irretrievably prove his children were neglected and abused to the public. An image speaks louder than a thousand words. You can't play word games with damning still frames. A lot of people want this out because even though Nick insists this is about his private life, he keeps talking about these things, and lying non-stop, because supposedly this is no-one's business, so he's entitled to lie about it. This inevitably causes justifiable indignation to anyone familiar with the details. So no. It is not that Nick wants to avoid embarrassment alone. It is more that the body cam footage will make it close to impossible for anyone to believe his lies, and he knows it.
 
Last edited:
mundane matt's flagging and tonka and warski's beef leading up to Knoxville are comparably so minor of transgressions now that it almost seems laughable anyone cared in the first place.
I still consider Metokur outing King of /pol/ to be the funniest stream I have ever seen, with the Cokestream a close second. The Sektur was less depressing back then, now it's just crackheads and pedophiles.
 

Grifty's "issue" is that he is a subhuman who has admitted in the past that both he and his wife did hard drugs during at least one of her pregnancies. He has also seeming admitted to also be a cuck and a swinger. His defense of Nick has been that if one applies the standards of drug parents in the hood or the trailer park, what Nick has done isn't a big deal. Based on things he has said in the past, Grifty approves of everything Nick has done and would probably approve of anything that anyone has accused Nick of doing. He is just that kind of guy.
 
Back