Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Watching Rekieta]

Guys, the EXIF on the lounge photo isn't legitimate. It took him 20 minutes to get it because he went to Google and did this:

View attachment 7442137

It's an obvious mix of arrest day photos and non arrest day photos. Sprinkle a few images of some cops in there and call it good.

What needs to happen now:

@Potentially Criminal hosts a stream on the photos and invites Kurt as an expert that has visited the crack house. Comment on each photo as it relates to Kurt's recollection. Preferably from a Denny's. "I remember it being a lot dirtier than that photo. Letting the dog continuously shit in its dungeon stunk up the whole house. Nick was noseblind to dog shit."

Nick will start yelling at the AI again. He'll stroke out at the idea of Kurt having the moral highground.

 

[Kakkerum420]

I can hear Andy going “WAITWAITWAIT, who puts paper towels on the table??” Or shit like that, wasting 16 minutes of time doing interjections about nothing.

I don't really watch the Kino Casino but I imagine the dog shit segment will be pretty interesting.

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

Everyone getting mad about how Nick treats his dog as he helplessly flails is gonna be a great clip for the future.

Its such a mask off narc moment. Being shitty to his dog genuinely might make more people angry than him being a bad father.

 

[Microplastics In My Blood]

I think people are way over thinking the AI thing. He can't plan shit out like that. And if he did he would have had the photos stacked up ready to go on his PC.

While fumbling around he said the photos where on his PHONE and he was trying to get them to his PC. Why wouldn't they already be on his PC with all his other court stuff?
I think someone hit the nail on the head by saying the clean photos are the photos he took, on his phone, when applying to get his kids back. After the house was cleaned. He fumbled around to shuffle those in with the few real raid day photos with the messy junkie looking living room and the shitfloor/cop photo to try and validate all the photos. These photos where clearly not all in the same folder ready to go, if they where he could have just showed them one after the next.

Yeah I don't buy the AI angle, I think there would be some typical AI weirdness that would give it away. I think they are either cherry picked to fuck or they are from a later date with raid day photos mixed in. They are from odd angles and despite him going through the document to deboonk it, he didn't show the picture of the stairs to deboonk the overturned sofa, one of the most unusual claims.

The Exif data cannot be trusted.
1. Someone who knows the term Exif should know how to very quickly see metadata and not take as long as he did (it would be like someone knowing how to unzip a .Zip file but not knowing how to use file explorer)
2. The length of time he took allows for serious doubt. In that time he could have easily used a browser based or downloaded an Exif editing tool
3. He only showed a picture of the Exif data, not a live version of the data. This is the equivalent of someone showing a screen shot of a discord message, rather than through the app. He is live on his pc, he could easily moved the picture to a new folder, right clicked, gone to properties and shown it.
4. He states later in the stream and in the comments that he doesn't know how to show Exif data despite doing it already which is sus as fuck. (maybe he used a service that gives you a freebie and if you want to do more you have to pay a subscription?)

Any "evidence" of Exif data dates are now worthless since he has had plenty of time to edit it.

 

[HackerX]

presented without comment
View attachment 7442213

I don't recall what that citizen M fellow did that was so retarded when he has an account, but I do remember he was exceptionally retarded. It does not appear that he changed.

 

[147573952589676412927]

Nick should just do a live stream and show us around his streaming room and house tonight. I’m sure he’s living in a perfectly tidy home right now.

This was exactly what I thought at the time, the perfect end to this stream, if it was real, which it wasn't, would be to walk around his house and show how clean it is, but he didn't, because it isn't.

Even the fucking A.I. sees through this shit, here's a completely unflavored, unprompted response to the question: "how does nick rekieta manufacture truth?"

Nick Rekieta (also known as Rekieta Law) is a YouTube personality and attorney known for his livestreams and commentary on legal issues, often involving high-profile or controversial cases. His content blends legal analysis, personal opinion, and entertainment, and he sometimes features speculation or unverified claims.

If we’re considering how the tactic you described — mixing legitimate evidence with fabricated or misleading elements to lend credibility to the whole — might apply to Nick Rekieta or his content, here’s a general and balanced breakdown:

---

​

(Depending on the episode or case he’s covering)

1. Use of Real Legal Documents or Testimony​

Nick often cites real court filings, transcripts, or statutes, which gives his streams a veneer of credibility. These legitimate elements anchor the discussion.

2. Mixed With Speculative Commentary​

He sometimes layers speculative, sarcastic, or heavily editorialized takes on top of this — possibly exaggerating motives, outcomes, or interpretations. These opinions, while framed as commentary, may be presented with the same confidence as the verified content.

3. Entertainment Framing​

His platform mixes legal commentary with humor, drinking, and internet culture references. This may blur the line between serious legal analysis and performative narrative, especially for audiences less familiar with legal norms.

4. Guest Appearances or Shared Claims​

Occasionally, he features guests or references third-party claims (especially from social media), some of which are dubious or outright false. When these are mixed in with authentic content, it can create the appearance of a cohesive, well-supported case — even if parts are shaky.

---

​

If someone takes some true things Nick says (e.g., quoting court docs), then mixes them with incorrect interpretations or speculation, it could lead viewers to:

• Overestimate the accuracy of the entire narrative
• Accept unverified or biased conclusions as “probably true”
• Struggle to separate fact from entertainment or exaggeration

This isn't necessarily unique to Rekieta — it's common in pundit-driven media, especially on YouTube or livestreaming platforms where the boundaries between news, analysis, and entertainment are thin.

---

Would you like a specific example of this tactic in one of his case coverages (like Rittenhouse, Depp v. Heard, or another)?

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

That's what he said to kayla during sex

What the fuck do you mean you want me to get an erection? Are you trying to tell me the Balldo isn't good enough for you? I use it on April and she's moaning like the whore she is. You have five kids and it's like throwing a cocktail weenie down a hallway...

 

[Vibralldo]

Duster spotted. Hes huffing duster

He's also drinking strawberry monster like a woman or homosexual

 

[The Noticer]

These photos are all obviously taken after he had his parents come clean his shithole house post-arrest. This crackhead really thinks everyone is as stupid and gullible as his whore April

 

[Schpoots]

Red monsters are based. Wait for the knock, Child.

 

[Captain Manning]

Everyone getting mad about how Nick treats his dog as he helplessly flails is gonna be a great clip for the future.

Its such a mask off narc moment. Being shitty to his dog genuinely might make more people angry than him being a bad father.

It's the K shit that pissed me off the most, actually.

I'm still incensed.

I'm actually debating whether I should say why. Still haven't decided yet. Either way, fuck Nick with a barbed wire Balldo.

I don't recall what that citizen M fellow did that was so retarded when he has an account, but I do remember he was exceptionally retarded. It does not appear that he changed.

He's @SaddamLanza. Just go through his post history. Absolute dumbass.

His profile was fun too, but Null has profiles of banned users borked ATM.

 

[Dean Pentel]

Being shitty to his dog genuinely might make more people angry than him being a bad father.

Dafuq?!! I don't want to go looking through the thread because if I see he was mistreating a dog I'll get more MATI than some of you when I pointed out that Nick, all the people in his open relationship, and all the people making content about his antics are rather unsightly looking individuals. @Fapcop aside, I had no idea that people like Keanu and Chrissie Mayr had legit simps up in this.

Red monsters are based. Wait for the knock, Child.

That's a pink monster, stalker. There will be no knock for him. There will be one for you. Enjoy!

 

[arc minsk]

"Buddy... the paper towel metal holder is right there! LookLookLook... It's fucked"

"rekieta's kids do cocaine and he doesn't even put his paper towels away. this guy is twissssted"

 

[Vibralldo]

'I told the cops April didn't sleep there, and that was the truth, she hadn't slept yet' -Nick

LMAO

He's bragged about that before

He's very proud about his ability to lie

 

[Swiss46]

POV: You're a cop handing a search warrant to the local celebrity lawyer.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

I thought I read upthread that he said at the start the photos were from the CPS inspection? Why is everyone so butthurt that it wasn't from the day of? Did I misread it? I guess maybe there was misdirection since the drugs on the toilet was probably from the day of... It's so hard to keep track of this faggot's lies.

I mean I get it, we want to know what bad really looks like, and if this was good... well...
(I don't watch Nick anymore, at most I can only stomach clip channels, but even that can be rough. I refuse to give any heat to this faggot.)

 

[Kakkerum420]

He's bragged about that before

He's very proud about his ability to lie

If he could convince himself that that stream was a good idea he might be a better liar than we give him credit for.

 

[NuruMaleMasseuse]

presented without comment
View attachment 7442213

All three of those paintings perfectly represent our reactions to Nick's doofy receding hairline. To quote "All about the Benjamin's" Nick doesn't have dreams, he has movies.

 

[Trigger Me Timbers]

Nick seethes at the question and literally has no answer. "I don't know."
View attachment 7441811

Fucking pure kino him about to answer it like “9am is normal” but you can see his Swiss cheese mind slowly thinking “actually… there’s no way people think it’s normal for a mother for 5 to wake up that late…” and just goes the Ralphamale “fuck you bish!!!”

Also… I know he copes and seethes that it’s normal for his family because they have a different schedule… But isn’t he always like driving around at 7 o’clock in the morning (allegedly drunk) dropping his kids off to different home schools? He doesn’t 100% homeschool he does “micro schooling” Which means he takes his kids to other peoples houses. Are all the other people in Candy-Ohio county also lushes who have breakfast at 1pm and bed time of 5am?

 

[Brian Oblivion]

Everyone getting mad about how Nick treats his dog as he helplessly flails is gonna be a great clip for the future.

Its such a mask off narc moment. Being shitty to his dog genuinely might make more people angry than him being a bad father.

The wine aunts are a huge part of Nick's remaining audience and their battle cry is literally "I don't care what happens to people but if someone hurts or neglects a furbaby I'll tear them apart myself!". He's really crashing the plane with no survivors as far as his fan base is concerned.